Factual, sceptical, or beyond journalism?
Epistemological discourses in media users’ perceptions of COVID-19 news
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v20i1.152749Keywords:
epistemological discourses, epistemic crisis, discourse analysis, journalism, crisis communicationAbstract
This study examines how individuals evaluate the legitimacy of knowledge in the context of journalism’s crisis communication. Based on an exploratory sample, we analyse epistemological discourses constructed in Finnish media users’ reflections on their engagement with and interpretation of COVID-19-related news and information. To examine these discourses, which we understand as encompassing both epistemological perceptions of reliability and authority, and as building blocks of collective identities, we conducted and analysed 14 semi-structured qualitative interviews with purposively selected media users. We identified three discourses. The first two are i) Journalistic knowledge is sufficiently reliable and ii) Journalistic knowledge is just one side of the story. These are micro-level discourses, i.e. participants’ individual perceptions of information and news on the COVID-19 pandemic. The third discourse is iii) Reliable knowledge existing beyond journalism. This meso-level discourse refers to participants’ observations of other discourses within their social and local communities. This study demonstrates the complex epistemological assumptions that inform understandings of reliable knowledge in the context of journalism, including media users’ divergent perceptions of scientific knowledge. Our findings show that struggles over knowledge are shaped both by the ideological advocacies on which they draw and by the collective identities constructed within epistemological discourses.
References
Ala-Fossi, M. (2020). Finland: Media welfare state in the digital era? Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 2020, 11(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00020_1
Ala-Fossi, M., Grönlund, M., Hellman, H., & Lehtisaari, K. (2020). Media- ja viestintäpolitiikan seurantaraportti 2019 [Media and communication policy monitoring report 2019]. Ministry of Transport and Communications. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-243-581-1
Andersen, K., Shehata, A. & Andersson, D. (2021). Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspective. Digital Journalism, ahead-of-print, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412
Bein, S. (2022). How is collective identity possible in democracies? Political integration and the Leitkultur debate in Germany. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 63, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-021-00365-4
boyd, d. (2018, March 9). You think you want media literacy . . . Do you? Data & Society. https://medium.com/datasociety-points/you-think-you-want-media-literacy-do-you-7cad6af18ec2
Carlson, M. (2020). Journalistic epistemology and digital news circulation: Infrastructure, circulation practices, and epistemic contests. New Media & Society, 22(2), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819856921
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. El Profesional de La Información, 29(2), e290223. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, G. L. (2022). Belonging: The science of creating connection and bridging divides. W. W. Norton & Company, Incorporated.
Cushion, S., Morani, M., Kyriakidou, M. & Soo, N (2022). (Mis)understanding the coronavirus and how it was handled in the UK: An analysis of public knowledge and the information environment. Journalism Studies, 23(5–6), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1950564
Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracy. Javnost (Ljubljana, Slovenia), 25(1–2), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819
D’Ancona, M. (2017). Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. Ebury Press.
Eicher, J. P. R. (2025). A provincial pandemic: European ignorance of the 1918 ‘Spanish’ influenza as a shared event. Contemporary European History, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777325000074
Ekström, M. (2002). Epistemologies of TV journalism: A theoretical framework. Journalism 3(3), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300301
Eldridge II, S. A. (2025). Journalism in a Fractured World. Peter Lang.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd edition). Japan: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Farkas, J. (2023). Discourse analysis in journalism studies. Journalistica, 17(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.138573
Farkas, J. & Schou, J. (2024). Post-truth, fake news and democracy: Mapping the politics of falsehood. 2nd edition. New York & London: Routledge.
Fishman, M. (1980). Manufacturing the news. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T. & Clever, L. (2023). Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the COVID-19 crisis. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259
Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity, immigration, and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0058
Groot Kormelink, T. & Klein Gunnewiek, A. (2022). From “far away” to “shock” to “fatigue” to “back to normal”: How young people experienced news during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism Studies, 23(5–6), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1932560
Grönlund, M., Villi, M., & Ala-Fossi, M. (2024). Press Subsidies and Business Performance of Newspaper Publishing in Three Nordic Media Welfare States. Media and Communication, 12, Article 7570. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7570
Grönlund, M., Lehtisaari, K., Ruotsalainen, J., Hujanen, J., & Tuomola, S. (2022). Koronapandemia, kriisitieto ja media: Päätoimittajien ja paikallisen yleisön näkemyksiä koronauutisoinnista ja -viestinnästä (SSKH Notat, No. 3/2022). Svenska social- och kommunalhögskolan vid Helsingfors universitet.
Haider, J. & Sundin, O (2022). Paradoxes of media and information literacy: The crisis of information. London & New York: Routledge.
Hallin, D. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hameleers, M. (2020). My reality is more truthful than yours: Radical right-wing politicians’ and citizens’ construction of “fake” and “truthfulness” on social media – Evidence from the United States and the Netherlands. International Journal of Communication, 14, 1135–1152.
Horowitz, M., Karell, E. & Kekkonen, A. (2023). Report on national surveys in the NORDIS countries on audiences’ experiences of media trust and disinformation. NORDIS – NORdic observatory for digital media and information DISorders. https://nordishub.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Report-on-National-Surveys-in-the-NORDIS-Countries-on-Audiences-Experiences-of-Media-Trust-and-Disinformation-2.pdf
Hujanen, J., Ruotsalainen, J., Vaarala, V., Lehtisaari, K., & Grönlund, M. (2023). Performing journalism: Making sense of ethical practice within local interloper media. Journalism, 24(12), 2668–2686. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221131626
Hujanen, J., Lehtisaari, K., Lindén, C.-G., & Grönlund, M. (2019). Emerging forms of hyperlocal media: The case of Finland. Nordicom Review, 40(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0029
Jallinoja, P., Vento, E., & Väliverronen, E. (2024). Trust in scientific institutions and experts during the first 2 years of the COVID 19 pandemic in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 53(4), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241289633
Jallinoja, P. & Väliverronen, E. (2021). Suomalaisten luottamus instituutioihin ja asiantuntijoihin COVID19-pandemiassa. Media & Viestintä, 44(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.107298
Koivunen, A. (2021). Managing moods: Media, politicians, and anxiety over public debate. In A. Koivunen, J. Ojala, & J. Holmén (Eds.), The Nordic economic, social and political model: Challenges in the 21st century (pp. 195–211).
Kreiss, D. (2019). The fragmenting of the civil sphere: How partisan identity shapes the moral evaluation of candidates and epistemology. In J. L. Mast & J. L. Mast (Eds.) Politics of meaning/Meaning of Politics (pp. 223–241). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kunelius, R. (2000). Journalismi nelijalkaisena otuksena. Tutkimuksen näkökulmia, ongelmia ja haasteita. Media & viestintä 23(3). https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.61519
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.
Lewis, S. C. & Westlund, O. (2015). Big data and journalism: Epistemology, expertise, economics, and ethics. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976418
Loosen, W. (2015). The Notion of the ‘Blurring Boundaries’. Journalism as a (De)Differentiated Phenomenon. Digital Journalism, 3(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.928000
Lupton, D. & Lewis, S. (2021). Learning about COVID-19: A qualitative interview study of Australians’ use of information sources. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 662–662. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10743-7
Maares, P., & Hanusch, F. (2023). Understanding peripheral journalism from the boundary: A conceptual framework. Digital Journalism, 11(7), 1270–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2134045
Malinen, S., Koivula, A., Keipi, T. & Saarinen, A. (2022). Shedding light on people’s social media concerns through political party preference. In M. Conrad, G. Hálfdanarson, A. Michailidou, C. Galpin & N. Pyrhönen (Eds.). Europe in the age of post-truth politics. Populism, disinformation and the public sphere (pp. 199–222). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
Masullo, G. M., Jennings, J. & Stroud, N.J. (2022). “Crisis coverage gap”: The divide between public interest and local news’ Facebook posts about COVID-19 in the United States. Digital Journalism, 10(6), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1965488
Mihelj, S., Kondor, K. & Štětka, V. (2022). Audience engagement with COVID-19 news: The impact of lockdown and live coverage, and the role of polarization. Journalism Studies, 23(5–6), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1931410
Mortensen, M. & Nørgaard Kristensen, N. (2023). At the boundaries of authority and authoritarianism in the welfare state: News coverage of alt. health influencers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Javnost – The Public, 30(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2023.2168442
Newman, N. (2025). Executive summary and key findings. In N. Newman, A. R. Arguedas, C.T. Robertson, R. K. Nielsen & R. Fletcher (Eds.) Digital News Report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (pp. 9–35). https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2025-06/Digital_News-Report_2025.pdf
Nielsen, R. K. & Graves, L. (2017). “News you don’t believe”: Audience perspectives on fake news, 1–8. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017- 10/Nielsen%26Graves_factsheet_1710v3_FINAL_download.pdf
Norris, P. (2014). Watchdog journalism. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin and T. Schillemans (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 525–542). Oxford University Press.
Parks, P. (2022). Senses of truth and journalism’s epistemic crisis. Journal of Media Ethics, 37(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2022.2107523
Reunanen, E. (2022). Finland. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, C.T. Robertson, K. Eddy & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.) Digital News Report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (pp. 76–77). https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/Digital_News-Report_2022.pdf
Robertson, C. T. (2025, April 23). Examining journalists’ epistemological beliefs: What do UK journalists believe about truth, objectivity, and interpretation? Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Ruotsalainen, J., Vaarala, V., Hujanen, J., Grönlund, M & Lehtisaari, K. (2024). A Servant of the Authorities or an Ally of Civil Society? The Role Perceptions and Role Performance of Local Interloper Media. Journalism Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2352703
Schudson, M. (2022). What does “trust in the media” mean? Daedalus, 151(4), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01948
Saarinen, A., Koivula, A., & Keipi, T. (2020). Political trust, political party preference and trust in knowledge-based institutions. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(1/2), 154–168.
Schwarzenegger, C. (2020). Personal epistemologies of the media: Selective criticality, pragmatic trust, and competence–confidence in navigating media repertoires in the digital age. New Media & Society, 22(2), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819856919
Sirola, A., Nuckols, J., Nyrhinen, J. & Wilska, T-A. (2022). The use of the dark web as a COVID-19 information source: A three-country study. Technology in Society, 70, 102012–102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102012
Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The Media Welfare State: Nordic Media in the Digital Era. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65swsg
Tiedebarometri (2022). https://digiplus.fi/www/Tiedebarometri/2022/index.html#p=18
Vaarala, V., & Farkas, J. (2025). A Discursive Turn in Journalism Studies? A Systematic Review of Discourse Analysis in Leading Journalism Journals. Journalism Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2025.2600439
Valaskivi, K. & Robertson, D.G. (2022). Introduction: Epistemic contestations in the hybrid media environment. Popular Communication, 20(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2057998
Valentini, C., Badham, M. & Mykkänen, M. (2023). Covid-19 voices in Finnish news media in the global context: A comparative study of news media’s roles in pandemic communications and public perceptions across six countries. JYU Reports: 32. https://doi.org/10.17011/jyureports/2023/27
Valgarðsson, V., Jennings, W., Stoker, G., & others. (2025). A crisis of political trust? Global trends in institutional trust from 1958 to 2019. British Journal of Political Science, 55, e15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123424000498
Van Dalen, A. (2020). Journalism, trust and credibility. In T. Hanitzsch & K. Wahl-Jorgensen (Eds.) The handbook of journalism studies (2nd ed., pp. 356–371). London: Routledge.
Van Zoonen, L. (2012). I-pistemology: Changing truth claims in popular and political culture. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112438808
Vermeer, S., Kruikemeier, S., Trilling, D. & de Vreese, C. (2022). Using panel data to study political interest, news media trust, and news media use in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism Studies, 23(5–6), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2017790
Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866–1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
Ytre-Arne, B. (2023). Media use in digital everyday life. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Publishing.
Ytre-Arne, B. & Hallvard, M. (2021). Doomscrolling, monitoring and avoiding: News use in COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Journalism Studies, 22(13), 1739-1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1952475
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Salla Tuomola, Jaana Hujanen, Katja Lehtisaari, Juho Ruotsalainen, Mikko Grönlund
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).
