Exploring party-issue linkages as an indicator of issue ownership in election news coverage
A study of two Danish national elections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v18i1.143784Nøgleord:
elections, issue salience, issue competition, news media, agenda settingResumé
Research on issue ownership has placed political parties at the centre of studies. Recent research argues that this focus should be expanded. First, researchers have found that the salience of different political issues is affected by events exogenous to political parties, such as real-world events and societal trends. Second, researchers have pointed to the news media as an additional arena for issue ownership competition and maintenance, making the concept of party–issue linkages in election coverage an additional topic of study. This article contributes to election research by exploring party–issue linkage as an indicator of issue ownership for both political parties and political leaders in the two most recent national Danish elections. Both elections were affected by societal trends and real-world events. Based on large-scale content analysis and using descriptive statistics, we find a clear shift in media saliences from 2019 to 2022. We also find changes in party–issue linkage for both political parties and specific political leaders, especially regarding the most salient issues of the elections.
Referencer
Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1994). Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: The joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(3), 335–357, https://doi.org/10.1086/269431
Aalberg, T., & Jenssen, A. T. (2007). Do television debates in multiparty systems affect viewers? A quasi‐experimental study with first‐time voters. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(1), 115–135, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00175.x
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
Binderkrantz, A., & Carlsen, H. (2002). Når sammenholdet brydes: splittelser af partier i Danmark (When unity breaks down. The splitting of parties in Denmark). Politica, 34(2), 168–185.
Blach-Ørsten, M., & Willig, I. (2016). Mediernes, politikernes og borgernes dagsorden. (The media’s, the politician’s and the citizens’ agenda) In Den fælles dagsorden og alle de andre: En nyhedsugeanalyse af medieindhold, mediebrug og medieforventninger (pp. 29-40). Samfundslitteratur.
Blach-Ørsten, M., Eberholst, M. K., Hartley, J. M., & Steensberg, M. R. (2020). En ny dagsorden? Valgkampen 2019 i nyhedsmedierne. (A new agenda? The 2019 election campaign in the news media) I I. Tundby Gulbrandsen, & S. N. Just (red.), #FV19 : Politisk kommunikation på digitale medier (s. 69-88). Samfundslitteratur.
Blach-Ørsten, M., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). Det politiske informationslandskab i Danmark 2.0 (The political information landscape in Denmark 2.0) Politica, 53(2), 99-124, https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i2.130381
Blach- Ørsten, M., & Eberholst, M. K. (2023). Valgbarometer FV22: Krisevalget - Et jordskredsvalg mod den politiske midte. (The election barometer 22: The crisis election – a landslide towards the political middle.) Center for Nyhedsforskning, Roskilde Universitet, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7351607
Bruhn, M. (2022, 11 September). Vermund forsvarer sin valgkamp efter intern kritik: Jeg kunne ikke have gjort det bedre (Vermund defends her election campaign after internal criticism. I could not have done better). Altinget. https://www.altinget.dk/artikel/vermund-forsvarer-sin-valgkamp-efter-intern-kritik-jeg-kunne-ikke-have-gjort-det-bedre
Burdina, M. (2014). Wave riding or owning the issue: How do candidates determine campaign agendas? The American Economist, 59(2), 139–152, https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451405900
Castro, L., Strömbäck, J., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., de Vreese, C., Aalberg, T., ... & Theocharis, Y. (2022). Navigating high-choice European political information environments: A comparative analysis of news user profiles and political knowledge. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 827–859, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221101
Damsbo-Svendsen, S. & Seeberg, H.B. (2024). ‘Næsten fuld plade på alle politiske emner’ (Almost a full plate on all issues) in Hansen & Stubager (red.) Partiledernes kamp om midten, s.303-328. København: Djøfs Forlag.
Dennison, J. (2019). A review of public issue salience: Concepts, determinants, and effects on voting. Political Studies Review, 17(4), 436–446, https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299188192
Dennison, J., & Kriesi, H. (2023). Explaining Europe’s transformed electoral landscape: structure, salience, and agendas. European Political Science Review, 15(4), 483–501, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000085
Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2017). Still an agenda setter: Traditional news media and public opinion during the transition from low to high choice media environments. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 733–757, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12327
Edy, J. A., & Meirick, P. C. (2018). The fragmenting public agenda: Capacity, diversity, and volatility in responses to the “most important problem” question. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(4), 661–685, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy043
Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Issue ownership and agenda setting in the 2019 Swiss national elections. Swiss Political Science Review, 28(2), 190–208, https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12496
Green‐Pedersen, C. (2006). Long‐term changes in Danish party politics: the rise and importance of issue competition. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(3), 219–235, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00150.x
Green‐Pedersen, C., & Krogstrup, J. (2008). Immigration as a political issue in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Political Research, 47(5), 610–634, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00777.x
Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2015). Avoidance and engagement: Issue competition in multiparty systems. Political Studies, 63(4), 747–764, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12
Green-Pedersen, C. (2020). Issue competition in the 2019 Danish general election. Scandinavian Political Studies, 43(2), 90–95, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12164
Green-Pedersen, C., & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2020). Party system. Open yet stable. In P. M. Christiansen, J. Elklit, & P. Nedergaard (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of Danish politics. Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198833598.013.41
Hallin, D. C. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, K. M., & Stubager, R. (2017). Folketingsvalget 2015-oprør fra udkanten. (The 2015 national election – a cry from the periphery) In Oprør fra udkanten: Folketingsvalget 2015 (pp. 21-40). København: Djøf Forlag.
Hansen, K. M., & Stubager, R. (2021). Klimavalget. (The climate election) Djøf Forlag.
Hansen, K. M., & Stubager, R. (red) (2024). Partiledernes kamp om midten. (The party leaders battle for the middle) Djøf Forlag.
Holstein, E (May 13 th., 2019). ‘Ny måling: Den grønne dagsorden tager suveræn førsteplads’ (New survey: The green agenda takes overwhelming first place). Altinget. https://www.altinget.dk/artikel/ny-maaling-den-groenne-dagsorden-tager-en-suveraen-foersteplads
Hopmann, D. N., De Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2011). Incumbency bonus in election news coverage explained: The logics of political power and the media market. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 264-282, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01540.x
Jensen, J. L., & Schwartz, S. A. (2020). The 2019 Danish general election campaign: The ‘normalisation’ of social media channels? Scandinavian Political Studies, 43(2), 96–104, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12165
Johansson, B., & Strömbäck, J. (2019). Kampen om mediebilden: Nyhetsjournalistik i valrörelsen (The battle for coverage. News and the 2018 election). Institut för mediestudier. Stockholm.
Kjeldsen & Richter, L. (7 November, 2022): Hvorfor gik Enhedslisten tilbage? Alternativet, Nato og Rwanda kan være årsagerne. (Why did the red/green alliance lose votes?) Information: https://www.information.dk/indland/2022/11/hvorfor-gik-enhedslisten-tilbage-alternativet-nato-rwanda-kan-vaere-aarsagerne
Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2012). The 2011 Danish parliamentary election: A very new government. West European Politics, 35(2), 415–424, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.648015
Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2016). Tremors, no earthquake: the 2015 Danish parliamentary election. West European Politics, 39(4), 870–878, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1113662
Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2020). Stronger core, weaker fringes: The Danish general election 2019. West European Politics, 43(4), 1011–1022, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1655920
Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2023). New (types of) parties and government: the Danish general election 2022. West European Politics, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2174742
Kristensen, N. N. & Blach-Ørsten. (2015). Politisk kommunikation i Danmark (Political communication in Denmark). In Makt, medier og politikk: Norsk politisk kommunikasjon (pp. 279-288). Universitetsforlaget.
Kristensen, N. N., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2020). Media and politics in Denmark. In Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 29–49). Nordicom.
McCombs, M., & Zhu, J. H. (1995). Capacity, diversity, and volatility of the public agenda: Trends from 1954 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 495–525, https://doi.org/10.1086/269491
Meret, S. (2021). Duties first, rights next! The Danish Social Democrats’ right turn on migration politics. In Social democracy in the 21st century (pp. 223–244). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Merz, N. (2016). Gaining voice in the mass media: The effect of parties’ strategies on party–issue linkages in election news coverage. Acta Politica, 52, 436–460, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0026-9
Moniz, P., & Wlezien, C. (2020, September 28). Issue Salience and Political Decisions. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved 22 Oct. 2024, from https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1361
Mykkänen, J., Nord, L., & Moring, T. (2022). Ten years after: Is the party-centered theory of campaign professionalization still valid? Party Politics, 28(6), 1176–1186, https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211045
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, vol 40 (3):825–850, https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
Redder, H (2019, 13 September): Nu fremlægger DF en klima-plan. Vi er 100 procent tilhængere af en grøn omstilling (Danish People’s Party present a climate plan. We are 100 percent belivers in a green transition). TV 2: https://nyheder.tv2.dk/politik/2019-09-13-nu-fremlaegger-df-en-klimaplan-vi-er-100-procent-tilhaengere-af-en-groen-omstilling
Scammell, M. (2016). Designer politics: How elections are won. Springer.
Schjørring, E. (2022). ’En unge inde i valgkampen. Et emne stormer frem’. (One week into the election. One issue is taking the lead) https://www.altinget.dk/christiansborg/artikel/en-uge-inde-i-valgkampen-et-emne-stormer-op-paa-vaelgernes-dagsorden
Schrøder, K., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Eberholst, M. K. (2023). Danskernes brug af nyhedsmedier 2023 (The Danes and their news media use). Center for Nyhedsforskning. Roskilde Universitet.
Schwarzbözl, T., Fatke, M., & Hutter, S. (2020). How party‒issue linkages vary between election manifestos and media debates. West European Politics, 43(4), 795–818, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1609292
Seeberg, H. B. (2017). How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis. Political Studies, 65(2), 475–492, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716650224
Stubager, R., Hansen, K. M., & Andersen, J. G. (2013). Krisevalg: Økonomien og folketingsvalget 2011. (The crisis election. The economy and the 2011 national election) Jurist-og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
Spoon, J. J., Hobolt, S. B., & De Vries, C. E. (2014). Going green: Explaining issue competition on the environment. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 363–380, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12032
Syvertsen, T., Mjøs, O., Moe, H., & Enli, G. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era (p. 165). University of Michigan Press, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001
Thomsen, J. P. F., & Thomsen, A. H. (2023). Intergroup contact reduces affective polarization but not among strong party identifiers. Scandinavian Political Studies, 46(4), 241–263, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12242
Tresch, A., & Feddersen, A. (2019). The (in) stability of voters’ perceptions of competence and associative issue ownership: The role of media campaign coverage. Political Communication, 36(3), 394–411, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1542416
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Political agenda setting by the mass media: Ten years of research, 2005–2015. Handbook of public policy agenda setting, (pp. 157–179). Sage, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715922.00018
Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2007). Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 37–67, https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X0629757
Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Nuytemans, M. (2009). Issue ownership stability and change: How political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances. Political Communication, 26(2), 153–172, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902850718
Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Tresch, A. (2012). The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public opinion quarterly, 76(4), 771-782, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs023
Downloads
Yderligere filer
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2024 Mark Blach-Ørsten, Mads Kæmsgaard Eberholst
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse (by).
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).
