From stark opposition to partial adaption
How 12 Danish alternative media construct and position themselves vis-à-vis the media- and political mainstream
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.134823Nøgleord:
alternative media, partisanship, Danish media system, degrees of alternativeness, media criticism, political criticism, political parallelismResumé
Alternative media are defined by their position as challengers of mainstream media and politics alike. However, recent studies suggest that they act out their opposition to mainstream media and their political partisanship in different ways. Against this backdrop, the study at hand investigates how 12 Danish alternative media construct and position themselves against the media- and political mainstream. The study identifies substantial differences regarding the outlets’ commitment to or rejection of the ethical rules and norms of professional journalism, whether they adopt or deviate from a neutral journalistic style, what ideological agendas they advocate, their political ties, and the media- and political criticism they voice. In doing so, the study adds to a growing body of research suggesting that alternative media are a heterogeneous group. Based on these findings, the study discusses the different potentials for impact that alternative media have on the media- and political systems they enter.
Referencer
Atton, C. (2002). News Cultures and New Social Movements: radical journalism and the mainstream media. Journalism Studies, 3(4), 491–505. DOI:10.1080/1461670022000019209.
Barnidge, M. & Peacock, C. (2019). A Third Wave of Selective Exposure Research? The Challenges Posed by Hyperpartisan News on So-cial Media. Media and Communication 7(3), 4-7.
Blach-Ørsten, M. & Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). Det politiske informati-onslandskab i Danmark 2.0. Politica, 53(2), 99-124.
Brems, M. K. (2022). Party-Political and Ideological Partisanship in Danish Alternative Media: How Distinguishing between Types of Partisanship Can Advance Our Understanding of the Political Roles of Alternative Media, Journalism Studies, DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2022.2157316
Cushion, S., McDowell-Naylor, D. & Thomas, R. (2021). Why National Media Systems Matter: A Longitudinal Analysis of How UK Left-Wing and Right-Wing Alternative Media Critique Mainstream Media (2015–2018). Journalism Studies, 22(5), 633-652. DOI:10.1080/1461670X.2021.1893795
Cushion, S. (2021). UK Alternative Left Media and Their Criticism of Mainstream News: Analysing the Canary and Evolve Politics, Journalism Practice, DOI:10.1080/17512786.2021.1882875
Deterding, N. & Waters, M. (2021). Flexible Coding of In-depth Inter-views: A Twenty-first-century Approach. Sociological Methods & Research 50(2), 708-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377
Downing, J. (2001). Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Sage.
Figenschou, T. & Ihlebæk, K. (2019). Challenging Journalistic Authori-ty. Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies 20(9), 1221-1237. DOI:10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868.
Frischlich, L. Klapproth, J. & Brinkschulte F. (2020). Between Main-stream and Alternative – Co-orientation in Right-Wing Populist Alternative News Media. Disinformation in Open Online Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_12
Hallin, D. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems. Three Mod-els of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Heft, A., Mayerhöffer E., Reinhardt, S. & Knüpfer C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right‐wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies. Policy & Internet 12(1), 20-45. DOI:10.1002/poi3.219
Hjarvard, S. (2010). The views of the news: The role of political news-papers in a changing media landscape. Nothern Lights 8, 25-48.
Holt, K. (2016). Alternativmedier? En intervjustudie om mediekritik och mediemisstro. In L. Truedson (ed.), Migrationen i medierna: Men det får en väl inte prata om? (pp.113–149). Institutet för me-diestudier.
Holt, K. (2020). Right-Wing Alternative Media. Routledge.
Holt, K., Figenschou, T. & Frischlich L. (2019). Key dimensions of al-ternative news media. Digital Journalism 7(7), 860–869. DOI:10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715.
Ihlebæk, K. Figenschou, T. Eldridge II, S., Frischlich, L., Cushion, S. & Holt, K. (2022). Contesting the Mainstream: Understanding Alter-native News Media and Its Contribution to Diversity. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1267-1282. DOI:10.1080/21670811.2022.2134165
Ihlebæk, K. & Nygaard, S. (2021): Right-wing alternative media in the Scandinavian political communication landscape. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. Kristensen & L. Nord (eds.), Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp.263-282). Nordicom, Uni-versity of Gothenburg.
Kenix, L. (2011). Alternative and Mainstream Media: The Converging Spectrum. Bloomsbury Academic.
Klawier, T., Prochazka, F. & Schweiger, W. (2022). Comparing Frame Repertoires of Mainstream and Right-Wing Alternative Media. Digital Journalism. DOI:10.1080/21670811.2022.2048186
Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). How do Danish Right-wing Alternative Media Position Themselves Against the Mainstream? Advancing the Study of Alternative Media Structure and Content. Journalism Studies 22(2), 119-136. DOI:10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846.
Mayerhöffer, E. & Heft, A. (2021). Between Journalistic and Movement Logic: Disentangling Referencing Practices of Right-Wing Alter-native Online News Media. Digital Journalism, DOI:10.1080/21670811.2021.1974915
Mayerhöffer, E. & Schwartz, S. (2020). Fake eller partisk? Hyperparti-ske onlinemedier i den danske valgkamp 2019. In S. Just & I. Guldbrandsen (eds.), Politisk kommunikation og digitale medier, (pp.201–223). Samfundslitteratur.
McDowell-Naylor, D., Cushion S. & Thomas, R. (2021): A typology of alternative online political media in the United Kingdom: A lon-gitudinal content analysis (2015–2018). Journalism 0(0), 1-21. DOI:10.1177/14648849211059585.
Müller, P. & Freudenthaler, R. (2022). Right-Wing, Populist, Controlled by Foreign Powers? Topic Diversification and Partisanship in the Content Structures of German-Language Alternative Media. Digi-tal Journalism, 10(8), 1363-1386. DOI:10.1080/21670811.2022.2058972.
Nygaard, S. 2019. The appearance of objectivity: How immigration-critical alternative media report the news. Journalism Practice 13(10), 1147–1163. DOI:10.1080/17512786.2019.1577697.
Rae, M. (2021). Hyperpartisan news: Rethinking the media for popu-list politics. new media & society 23(5), 1117–1132. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820910416.
Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O & Moe H. (2014). The Media Welfare State: Nordic Media in the Digital Age. The University of Michigan Press.
von Nordheim, G. Müller, H. & Scheppe, M. (2019). Young, free and biased: A comparison of mainstream and right-wing media cover-age of the 2015–16 refugee crisis in German newspapers. Journal of Alternative and Community Media 4, 38–56. DOI: 10.1386/joacm_00042_1
Downloads
Yderligere filer
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2023 Miriam Kroman Brems
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse (by).
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).
