Accepting automated news as “low-quality” journalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v15i1.124985Nøgleord:
automated reporting; quality; human factor; journalism; boundary workResumé
This ethnographic case study explores how developers, editors, and reporters in two Norwegian newsrooms evaluate automated news and which logics underlie their assessments. Despite automation being described as the most disruptive data-centric practice of journalism, the observations and in-depth interviews show that all three groups define automated texts as journalism. At the same time, they characterize automated news as simplistic, lacking creativity and a critical approach, and argue that today’s machine-written texts are incapable of fulfilling central professional ideals such as critical scrutiny and advocating on behalf of the citizenry. Accepting automated news as journalism while simultaneously stressing its low quality shows a growing gap between what the newsroom groups are willing to accept because of organizational demands and what they ideally want journalism to be. The conflicting assessments may indicate financial motives gaining ground within Nordic media companies.
Referencer
Aase, T. H., & Fossåskaret, E. (2014). Skapte virkeligheter: Om produksjon og tolkning av kvalitative data [Created realities: Production and interpretation of qualitative data] (2nd ed.). Universitetsforlaget.
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001
Ahva, L., van Dalen, A., Hovden, J. F., Kolbeins, G. H., Löfgren Nilsson, M., Skovs- gaard, M., & Väliverronen, J. (2017). A welfare state of mind?: Nordic journalists’ conception of their role and autonomy in international context. Journalism Studies, 18(5), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1249005
Appelgren, E., & Lindén, C.-G. (2020). Data journalism as a service: Digital native data journalism expertise and product development. Media and Communication, 8(2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2757
Appelgren, E., & Nygren, G. (2019). HiPPOs (highest paid person’s opinion) in the Swedish media industry on innovation: A study of news media leaders’ attitudes towards innovation. The Journal of Media Innovations, 5(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5617/jomi.6503
Becker, H. S. (1970). Sociological work: Method and substance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129983
Benson, R. (2008). Normative theories of journalism. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), Blackwell international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 2591–2597). Blackwell.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carlson, M. (2014). The robotic reporter: Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976412
Carlson, M. (2015). Introduction: The many boundaries of journalism. In S. C. Lewis & M. Carlson (Eds.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation (pp. 1–18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727684
Creech, B., & Nadler, A. M. (2018). Post-industrial fog: Reconsidering innovation in visions of journalism’s future. Journalism, 19(2), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916689573
Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism?: Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
Downie, L., & Schudson, M. (2009, November/December). The reconstruction of American journalism: A report. Columbia Journalism Review. http://archives.cjr.org/reconstruction/the_reconstruction_of_american.php
Dzur, A. W. (2008). Democratic professionalism: Citizen participation and the reconstruction of professional ethics, identity, and practice. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Eide, M. (2011). Hva er journalistikk? [What is journalism?]. Universitetsforlaget.
Fletcher, A. J. (2016). Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401
Folkerts, J.(2014).History of journalism education. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs, 16(4), 227–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637914541379
Freidson, E. (2007). Professionalism: The third logic. Polity Press.
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
Heggen, K. (2008). Profesjon og identitet [Profession and identity]. In A. Molander & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier [The study of professions] (pp. 321–332). Universitetsforlaget.
Hermida, A., & Young, M. L. (2019). From peripheral to integral? A digital-born journalism not for profit in a time of crisis. Media and Communication, 7(4), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i4.2269
Holton, A. E., & Belair-Gagnon, V. (2018). Strangers to the game? Interlopers, intralopers, and shifting news production. Media and Communication, 6(4),70–78. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1490
Johansen, G. S. (2017, September 12). Roboten fant journalistiske poenger raskere enn en journalist hadde gjort [The robot found journalistic leads faster than a journalist would]. Journalisten. https://journalisten.no/valg-robotjourna- listikk-ole-kristian-bjellaanes/roboten-fant-journalistiske-poenger-raskere- enn-en-journalist-hadde-gjort/277589
Karlsen, J., & Stavelin, E. (2014). Computational journalism in Norwegian news- rooms. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2 013.813190
Kleis Nielsen, R. (2016). The many crises of Western journalism: A comparative analysis of economic crises, professional crises, and crises of confidence. In J. C. Alexander, E. B. Breese, & M. Luengo (Eds.), The crisis of journalism reconsidered: Democratic culture, professional codes, digital future (pp. 77–97). Cam- bridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316050774.006
Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2007). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press.
Lewis, S. C., Guzman, A. L., & Schmidt, T. R. (2019). Automation, journalism, and human–machine communication: Rethinking roles and relationships of humans and machines in news. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1577147
Lewis, S. C., & Usher, N. (2016). Trading zones, boundary objects, and the pursuit of news innovation: A case study of journalists and programmers. Convergence, 22(5), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515623865
Lindebø, K. (2019, January 13). Ny «medarbeider» i Adressa skriver hundrevis av boligsaker på kort tid [New “employee” in Adressa writes hundreds of real estate stories in no time]. Journalisten. https://journalisten.no/adresseavi- sen-agne-odegaard-boligsaker/ny-medarbeider-i-adressa-skriver-hundre- vis-av-boligsaker-pa-kort-tid/346691
Lindén, C.-G. (2017). Algorithms for journalism: The future of news work. The Journal of Media Innovations, 4(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.5617/jmi. v4i1.2420
Michalsen, G. L. (2016, January 13). Mandag skrev NTB pressehistorie: Norges første robotjournalist sendte ut fotballreferater [On Monday, NTB wrote press history: Norway’s first robot journalist sent out football reports]. m24.no. https://m24.no/automatisering-bakken-baeck-magasin/mandag-skrev-ntb-presse- historie-norges-forste-robotjournalist-sendte-ut-fotballreferater/132681
Örnebring, H. (2010). Technology and journalism-as-labour: Historical perspectives. Journalism, 11(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909350644 Østbye, H., Helland, K., Knapskog, K., & Larsen, L. O. (2013). Metodebok for mediefag [Methodology for media studies] (4th ed.). Fagbokforlaget.
Petersson, O. (1996). Politikens möjligheter: Har folkstyrelsen någon framtid? [The possibilities of politics: Does democracy have a future]. SNS förlag.
Schön, D. A. (1988). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass.
Singer, J. B. (2015). Out of bounds: Professional norms and boundary markers. In S. C. Lewis & M. Carlson (Eds.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation (pp. 21–36). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315727684-2
Sullivan, W. M. (2005). Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Susskind, R. E., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198713395.001.0001
Van Dalen, A. (2012). The algorithms behind the headlines: How machine-writ- ten news redefines the core skills of human journalists. Journalism Practice, 6(5–6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667268
Waisbord, S. R. (2013). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. Polity Press.
Waldenström, A., Wiik, J., & Andersson, U. (2019). Conditional autonomy: Journalistic practice in the tension field between professionalism and managerialism. Journalism Practice, 13(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786. 2018.1485510
Witschge, T., & Nygren, G. (2009). Journalistic work: A profession under pressure? Journal of Media Business Studies, 6(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1080 /16522354.2009.11073478
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publishing.
Zelizer, B. (2004). Taking journalism seriously: News and the academy. SAGE Publishing.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2021 Gunhild Ring Olsen
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse (by).
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).
