Meditation in the age of its technological mimicry
A dispositif analysis of mindfulness applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v1i1.127079Keywords:
Dispositif analysis, mindfulness applications, digital health, gamificationAbstract
In recent years, mindfulness meditation has become a popular technique to reduce stress or anxietyrelated problems and to enhance happiness and wellbeing. Apart from specific real-life mindfulness programs in schools, hospitals, military, and business environments, there is a strongly expanding field of digitally mediated mindfulness. From a critical psychological, ‘Foucauldian’ perspective,
we analyse popular mindfulness apps as dispositifs of power that contribute to aligning the selfgovernance of individuals with the requirements of neo-liberal governance. Our analysis exposes them as sociocultural artefacts fostering exactly such forms of subjectification that fit the neoliberal state of affairs. By freely amalgamating and interweaving psychological, Buddhist, and economic
‘knowledge’ (their ‘meditations’ being inspired, apart from alleged Buddhist sources, from cognitive behavioral therapy, positive psychology, and management literature), such apps orient self-government towards competition, optimization, enhancement, and acceleration, i.e., towards a happiness conflated with productivity – probably not quite what the Buddha had in mind.
References
Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Schocken Books.
Arthington, P. (2016). Mindfulness: A critical perspective. Community Psychology in Global
Perspective, 2 (1), 87-104.
Benjamin, W. (1969). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In H. Arendt
(Ed.), Illuminations. Schocken Books. https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/benjamin.pdf
(Original work published 1935)
Bröckling, U. (2016). The entrepreneurial Self. Sage.
Burgess, J., & Baym, N.K. (2020). Twitter. A biography. NYU Press.
Chlouba, D.L. (2018). “Performing Enlightenment” – Meditation im Zeitalter ihrer technischen
Reproduzierbarkeit [Unpublished master thesis]. University of Vienna.
http://othes.univie.ac.at/55025/1/58215.pdf
Fochler, L. (2021). Psyche gut, alles gut. Eine kritische Dispositivanalyse digitaler Applikation
von Psychotherapie. [Unpublished master thesis]. University of Vienna.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L.H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P.H. Hutton (Eds.),
Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). University of
Massachusetts Press.
Girstmair, S. (2010). “The Entrepreneurial Poor”. Das Subjekt im Anti-Aid-Entwicklungsdiskurs
[Unpublished diploma thesis]. University of Vienna. http://othes.univie.ac.at/12388/1/2010-12-
_0305480.pdf
Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., & Wilson, K.G. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The
Process and Practice of Mindful Change (2nd edition). Guilford Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. Harper & Row (Original work
published 1954).
Hristova, D., Dumit, J., Lieberoth, A. & Slunecko, T.(2019, November 14). Snapchat Streaks:
How adolescents metagame the gamification in social media.
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nszexMeditation in the age of its technological mimicry
Illouz, E. (2019). Emotions as commodities. Capitalism, consumption and authenticity. Routledge.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living. Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face
stress, pain and illness. Delta.
Klinger, S., & Kagerbauer, L. (2013). (De-)Thematisierungen und neoliberale Verdeckungen am
Beispiel feministischer Mädchen_arbeit – ein Zwischenruf. Gender, 2, 129-138.
Kuziemski, M. (2020). The False Promise of “Ethical AI”. Project Syndicate.
https://www.project-syndicate.org/onpoint/false-promise-of-ethical-ai-by-maciejkuziemski-2020-04
Light, B.A., Burgess, J.E., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the
study of apps. New Media and Society, 20(3), 881-900.
Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified Self. A sociology of self-tracking. Polity Press.
Meister, M. (2020). Sich verbiegen, ohne zu brechen. Dispositivanalyse der Resilienz-App
„SuperBetter“. [Unpublished master thesis]. University of Vienna.
McRobbie, A. (2010). Top Girls: Feminismus und der Aufstieg des neoliberalen
Geschlechterregimes. VS-Verlag.
Müller, D. (2016). Citius, altius, fortius. Self-tracking als Regierungstechnologie – Eine
Dispositivanalyse [Unpublished master thesis]. University of Vienna.
Niebel, V., & Straub, J. (2019). Die allgegenwärtige Aktivierung innerer Ressourcen. Diskurse
der Achtsamkeit in westlichen Gesellschaften. psychosozial 4(4), 5-17.
Nietzsche, F. (2005). Thus spoke Zarathustra. A book for everyone and nobody (transl. By
Graham Parkes). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1885)
Purser, R.E., Forbes, D., & Burke, T.A. (2016). Handbook of mindfulness. Culture, context, and
social engagement. Springer International Publishing.
Pritz, S.M. (2016). Mood Tracking: Zur digitalen Selbstvermessung der Gefühle. In S. Selke
(Ed.), Lifelogging (pp. 127-150). Springer VS.
Przyborski, A. & Slunecko, T. (2009). Against reification. Praxeological methodology and its
benefits. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic Process
Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences (pp. 141-170). Springer.
Rey, P.J. (2014). Gamification and Post-Fordian capitalism. In S. P. Walz, & S. Deterding (Eds.),
The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications (pp. 277-285). MIT Press.
Rose, N. (1989). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. Routledge.
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our Selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge
University Press.
Schaupp, S. (2017). Digital self-evaluation and the cybernetic regime: A sketch for a materialist
apparatus analysis. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for
a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 872-886.
https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.912
Schmidt, J. (2020). Achtsamkeit als kulturelle Praxis. Zu den Selbst-Welt-Modellen eines
populären Phänomens. transkript. https://www.transcriptverlag.de/media/pdf/47/04/b4/oa9783839452301S4idM3I8wjR8m.pdf
Schmid, M. (2013). Venus Oeconomica – Liebe und Kalkül. Eine kulturpsychologische Kritik
zeitgenössischer Beziehungsökonomik am Beispiel der technischen Herstellung romantischer
Intimität [Unpublished diploma thesis]. University of Vienna.
Schmid, M. & Slunecko, T. (2014). Die gewusste Liebe. Aspekte einer wissensförmigen
Herstellung romantischer Intimität. In: K.-J. Bruder, C. Bialluch, & B. Lemke (Eds.),
Machtwirkungen & Glücksversprechen. Gewalt und Rationalität in Sozialisation und
Bildungsprozessen (pp. 285-303). Psychosozial-Verlag.
Schröter, J. & Heilmann, T.A. (Eds.). (2016). Medienwissenschaft und Kapitalismuskritik.
Navigationen. Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturwissenschaften, 16(2).
Slunecko, T. (2008). Von der Konstruktion zur dynamischen Konstitution. Beobachtungen auf der
eigenen Spur (2nd edition). Wiener Universitätsverlag.
Slunecko, T. (2017). Beobachtungen auf der eigenen Spur. Bemerkungen zu einem für die Wiener
kulturpsychologische Schule charakteristischen Motiv. In T. Slunecko, M. Wieser, & A.
Przyborski (Eds.), Kulturpsychologie in Wien (pp. 27-54). facultas.
Slunecko, T. (2020). Tracking one’s own path. A methodological leitmotif of cultural psychology.
Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54(1), 196-214.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09479-2
Till, C. (2019). Creating ‘automatic subjects’: Corporate wellness and self-tracking. Health: An
interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness, and Medicine, 23(4) 418-435.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459319829957
Waquant, L. (2015). For a sociology of flesh and blood. Qualitative sociology, 38, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9291-y
Werthner, H. (2019). Vienna Manifesto for Digital Humanism.
https://www.informatik.tuwien.ac.at/dighum/index.php
Whitson, J.R. (2014). Foucault’s Fitbit: Governance and gamification. In S.P. Walz, & S.
Deterding (Eds), The Gameful World: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 339-358). MIT
Press.
Zuboff. S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The fight for a human future at the new
frontier of power. Public Affairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Slunecko, Laisha Chlouba
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IRTP operates based on a non-exclusive publishing agreement, according to which the journal retains the right of first publication, but authors are free to subsequently publish their work. The copyright of all work rests with the author(s).
All content published in IRTP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This license allows authors and readers to share and adapt content for non-commercial purposes, provided that they abide by the following terms:
- Give credit to the original author(s)/creator(s) and attribution parties (i.e., IRTP);
- Provide a link to the original source, to the extent practicable;
- Include the copyright notice and/or indicate the corresponding Creative Commons license;
- Indicate what, if any, adaptations were made to the original; and
- Share adapted content under the same license as the original.
Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the various Creative Commons licenses. Readers are advised to consult the licensing information embedded in each published work to ensure that they are familiar with the terms of use that apply.