“How Do We Replace Concrete?”
Building Sector Professionals Addressing Knowledge Asymmetries about Climate-wise Housing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi65.152197Keywords:
advice-giving, knowledge asymmetries, expert-to-expert communication, professional magazines, housing and construction sectoAbstract
The aim of the article is to explore how housing and construction field experts give advice concerning climate-wise housing in a professional magazine, and what types of potential knowledge asymmetries are connected with the advice. By potential knowledge asymmetries we refer to situations in which experts writing to other experts in a professional magazine indicate differences in the depth, scope, or type of knowledge possessed about a topic by offering advice to the readers. By offering advice, the authors position themselves as having epistemic authority on the topics they address. Based on argumentative, editorial-type texts in a Finnish building and construction field magazine, a pragmatic discourse analysis combined with qualitative content analysis of ways of advice-giving and sources of potential knowledge asymmetries in the context of climate-wise housing was conducted. The findings reveal that (1) all combinations of explicit-implicit and targeted-not-targeted advice-giving are present in the data, but explicit and not-targeted advice are most prevalent; (2) there are five main sources of potential knowledge asymmetries concerning system-level phenomena: technical, legal-regulatory, political, economic, and expertise-related. The paper concludes by discussing the potential and limitations of advice-giving in written expert-to-expert contexts in contributing to advancing climate-wise housing.
References
Abolfathiasl, H., & Abdullah, A. N. (2013). Pragmatic Strategies and Linguistic Structures in Making “Suggestions”: Towards Comprehensive Taxonomies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(6), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.6p.236
Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. (2012). Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 34(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.04.002
Alrøe, H. F., & Noe, E. (2011). The Paradox of Scientific Expertise: A Perspectivist Approach to Knowledge Asym-metries. Fachsprache, 33(3-4), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v33i3-4.1369
Andersen, E. M., Grønning, A., Hietaketo, M., & Johansson, M. (2019). Direct Reader Address in Health-related Online News Articles: Imposing Problems and Projecting Desires for Action and Change onto Readers. Journalism Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2019.1603080
Armon, R. (2016). Expert positions and scientific contexts: Storying research in the news media. Discourse & Communication, 10(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315600303
Bates, C. F. (2021). Mitigation in discourse: Social, cognitive and affective motivations when exchanging advice. Journal of Pragmatics 173, 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.008
Carlson, M. (2017). Journalistic Authority: Legitimating News in the Digital Era. Columbia University Press.
Coen, S., Meredith, J., Woods, R., & Fernandez, A. (2020). Talk like an expert: The construction of expertise in news comments concerning climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 096366252098172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520981729
Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126
DeCapua, A., & Dunham, J. F. (1993). Strategies in the discourse of advice. Journal of Pragmatics, 20 (6), 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90014-G
DeCapua, A., & Dunham, J. F. (2007). The pragmatics of advice giving: Cross-cultural perspectives. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4-3, 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.016
DeCarbon Home (2022). Project info. Available: https://decarbonhome.fi/decarbonhome-in-english/project-info/
Domenec, F., & Millot, P. (2021). What is professional in a professional magazine? Using corpus analysis to identify specializedness in professional discourse and culture. In G. Jacobs & S. Decock (Eds.), Good data in business and professional discourse research and teaching: further explorations (pp. 55-87). Palgrave Macmillan.
Eide, M. (2017). The culture of service journalism. In N. Nørgaard Kristensen & K. Riegert (Eds.), Cultural Journalism in the Nordic Countries (pp. 195-204). Nordicom.
Engberg, J. (2022). LSP and transdiscursive knowledge communication. In E. Isaeva (Ed.), Specialized Knowledge Mediation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95104-7_3
Eppler, M. J. (2004). Knowledge communication problems between experts and managers. An Analysis of Knowledge Transfer in Decision Processes. Paper # 1/2004. University of Lugano.
Ericsson, A. (2018). An introduction to the second edition of The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Its development, organization, and content. In K. Ericsson, R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt & A. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 3–20) (2nd ed., Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Franklin, B. (Ed.)., (2008). Pulling Newspapers Apart: Analysing Print Journalism (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203630709
Fürsich, E. (2012). Lifestyle journalism as popular journalism: Strategies for evaluating its public role. Journalism Practice, 6(1), 12-25.
Govindarajan, V.S., Chen, B. T., Warholic, R., Erk, K., & Li, J.J. (2020). Help! Need Advice on Identifying Advice. ArXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.427
Henricson, S., & Nelson, M. (2017). Giving and receiving advice in higher education. Comparing Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish supervision meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 109, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.013
Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in in-stitutional settings (Vol. 8) (pp. 359–417). Cambridge University Press.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi-org.proxy.uwasa.fi/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hutchby, I. (1995). Aspects of recipient design in expert advice‐giving on call‐in radio. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544915
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2012). ‘You could make this clearer’: Teachers’ advice on ESL academic writing. In Lim-berg, H. & Locher, M. A. (Eds.), Advice in Discourse (pp. 53–71). John Benjamins.
Jacobsen, U. C. (2014). Knowledge Asymmetry in Action. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 27(53), 57–72.
Kääntä, L. (2015). ”Kannattaa x” – rakenne ja toiminto direktiivisyyden ja kannanottamisen jatkumolla opiskeluverkkokes-kustelussa. Sananjalka: Suomen Kielen Seuran vuosikirja 57, 161–182.
Kääntä, L., Koskela, M., Syrjälä, H., & Salmela, E. (2024). “We Need to Build Carbon-Neutral Houses”–Discourses of Responsible Expertise in Finnish Professional Media. Environmental Communication 18(7), 912-926.
Kastberg, P., (2007). Knowledge communication – the emergence of a third order discipline. In Villiger, C. & Gerzymisch-Arbogast, H. (Eds.), Kommunikation in Bewegung: Multimedialer und multilingualer Wissenstransfer in der Experten-Laien-Kommunikation (pp. 7–24). Lang.
Kastberg, P. (2011). Knowledge Asymmetries: Beyond ”To Have and Have Not”. Fachsprache. International Journal of Specialized Communication 34(3-4), 137–151.
Katajamäki, H., & Koskela, M. (2006). The rhetorical structure of editorials in English, Swedish and Finnish business newspapers. In Proceedings of the 5th International Aelfe Conference (pp. 215-19).
Klemm, C., Das, E., & Hartmann, T. (2019). Changed priorities ahead: Journalists’ shifting role perceptions when covering public health crises. Journalism, 20(9), 1223–1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917692820
Kouper, I. (2010). The pragmatics of peer advice in a LiveJournal community. Language@Internet 7: article 1. Available: http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2464
Lähtinen, K., Toppinen, A., & Malm, N. (2019). Effects of lobbying among urban planners in Finland–Views on multi-storey wooden building. BioProducts Business, 77-92. https://doi.org/10.22382/bpb-2019-007
Lindholm, L. (2019). Form and Function of Response Stories in Online Advice. Åbo Akademi University Press.
Locher, M. (2006). Advice Online: Advice-Giving in an American Internet Health Forum. John Benjamins.
Lovell, H. (2004). Framing sustainable housing as a solution to climate change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 6(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908042000259677
Maier, C. D., & Engberg, J. (2021). Harvard Business Review's reframing of digital communication: From professional expertise to practical guidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.005
Mäntynen, A., & Shore, S. (2014). What is meant by hybridity? An investigation of hybridity and related terms in genre studies. Text & Talk, 34(6), 737-758. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0022
Nielsen, J., & Farrelly, M. A. (2019). Conceptualising the built environment to inform sustainable urban transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.07.001
Park, I. (2012). Seeking advice: Epistemic asymmetry and learner autonomy in writing conferences. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 2004-2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.012
Peltola, R. (2016). Permission and obligation intertwined: The twofold modal meaning of the Finnish jussive from a discourse perspective. Linguistics, De Gruyter, 2016, 54 (4), pp. 683-716. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0017
Rakennuslehti (2022a). Mediaopas (to the media). Available: https://www.rakennuslehti.fi/mediaopas/
Rakennuslehti (2022b). Mediatiedot 2022. Etsitkö näkyvyyttä rakennusalan näköalapaikalta. Available: https://www.rakennuslehti.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/rakennuslehti-mediakortti-2022.pdf
Rundblad, G., & Chen, H. (2015). Advice-giving in newspaper weather commentaries. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 14-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.004
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166848
Shore, S. (1988). On the so-called Finnish passive. Word (Worcester), 39, 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1988.11435787
Toivonen, R., Vihemäki, H., & Toppinen, A. (2021). Policy narratives on wooden multi-storey construction and implications for technology innovation system governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 125, 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102409
Usher, N. (2012). Service journalism as community experience: Personal technology and personal finance at the New York Times. Journalism Practice, 6(1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.628782
Vepsäläinen, H. (2022). Responses to advice-seeking on Reddit that do not give advice. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.025
Vine, B. (2004). Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. John Benjamins.
Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S., & Lorenzoni, I. (2013). Public engagement with climate change: What do we know and where do we go from here? International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 9(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.9.1.7_1
Yip, J. W.C. (2020). Directness of advice giving in traditional Chinese medicine consultations. Journal of Pragmat-ics, 166, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.016
Yoffe, H., Rankin, K., Bachmann, C., Posen, I. D., & Saxe, S. (2024). Mapping construction sector greenhouse gas emissions: a crucial step in sustainably meeting increasing housing demands. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 4(2), 025006–025006. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad546a
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Merja Koskela, Liisa Kääntä, Eveliina Salmela, Henna Syrjälä
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
