Training Legal Skills in the ESP Classroom: Mediation Activities and Student Self-Reflection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi64.147478Keywords:
Mediation, LSP, ESP, ELP, legal English, self-reflection, needs analysis, lawyer-client interviews, legal skills, pedagogy, CEFRAbstract
A general trend in adult education across the disciplines has been the gradual shift from teaching specialized knowledge to developing various skills. The inclusion of professional skills in the area of Languages for Specific Purposes (LSP) is often based on the results of complex needs analyses of the target situation that leads to effective course design both for in-service and pre-service learners. While major law schools have recently started putting a greater emphasis on the training of legal skills, the present article suggests that some of those legal skills can be effectively developed in the ELP (English for Legal Purposes) classroom as well, i.e. among L2 learners of specialist language. That holds particularly for the soft skill of linguistic mediation. Promoted by CEFR, mediation is characterized by the situation when an expert speaker needs to overcome a communicative gap arising from a difference in the technical or linguistic knowledge of the interlocutors.
The present article shows how a sample activity can be used for teaching linguistic mediation in the ELP classroom and how it can serve as an opportunity for enhancing students’ critical self-reflection. It describes a custom-made activity – a role-played lawyer-client interview – and analyses students’ subsequent comments on the activity. The paper suggests that self-reflection is deeper if the theory is supplied after the task and that such a practice enhances students’ learning process. It is suggested that the findings are applicable not only to teachers’ syllabus design and classroom activities design but also more generally to pedagogic theory, e.g. the field of LSP teacher training.
References
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.
Basturkmen, H. (2013). Needs analysis and syllabus design for language for specific purposes. In: C. A. Chapelle (Ed.) The Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics (unpaginated). Blackwell.
Belcher, D. (2009) English for Specific Purposes in Theory and Practice. University of Michigan Press.
Beyond Compliance, Ltd. (2024) https://www.beyond-compliance.co.uk/compliancematters/how-to-master-reflective-practice-and-why-its-so-important-to-solicitors-and-barristers/ (accessed 6.2.2024)
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman.
Bhatia, V. (2004). World of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.
Bilová, Š., Doupovcová, R., Hradilová, A., Hromádková, V., Chovancová, B., Kallus H. & Šimek, R. (2022). Právnická angličtina. Grada.
Brooman, S. & S. Stirk (2020). Who am I?: Using reflective practice and self-determination to redefine ‘employability’ in legal education. Liverpool Law Rev 41, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09240-5
Cenoz, J., Genesee F. & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics 35(3), 243-262.
Chovancová, B. (2014). Needs analysis and ESP course design: Self-perception of language needs among pre-service students. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 38(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0031
Chovancová, B. (2016). Mediation in legal English teaching. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 45(1), 21-35.https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0013
Chovancová, B. (2018). Practicing the skill of mediation in English for legal purposes. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 53(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0003
Chow, W.W., Wong, K. & Hiramoto, M. (2023) Tell me what happened: Pragmatics of affect in legal communication. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 36, 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09904-7
Costello, N. & Kulbicki, L. (2023). Practical English Language Skills for Lawyers. Routledge.
Dendrinos, B. (2006). Mediation in communication, language teaching and testing. Journal of Applied Linguistics 22(1), 9-35.
Dendrinos, B. (2013). Testing and teaching mediation. Directions in English Language Teaching and Testing. http://rcel.enl.uoa.gr/directions/issue1_1f.htm
Dewey J. (1991). How we think. Prometheus Books (Originally published by D.C. Heath, 1910).
Ding, A., & Campion, G. (2016). EAP teacher development. In: K. Hyland & P. Shaw (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 547-559). Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and Researching Motivation (3rd ed.). Longman.
Flowerdew, L. (2012). Needs analysis and curriculum development in ESP. In: B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (325-346). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch17
García-Sánchez, S. (2024) ESP intralinguistic mediation and professional knowledge building through collaborative CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 37(1-2), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2025842
Gibbons, J. P. (ed.). (1994). Language and the Law. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844329
Hafner, C. A., Harrison, S., Ho, W. Y. J. & Kwan, B. S. (2023). Digital mediation in ESP genres. English for Specific Purposes 71, 115-122.
Huhta, M., Vogt, K., Johnson, E. & Tulkki, H. (2013). Needs Analysis for Language Course Design: A Holistic Approach to ESP. Cambridge University Press.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Knox, J. & Stone, M. (2019). Embedding employability skills for the legal professionals of the future. The Law Teacher 53(1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2018.1490472
Korai, M. & Papadima-Sophocleous, S. (2021). The potential of the CEFR for languages descriptors for mediation in an ESP CALL-based context. In: S. Papadima-Sophocleous, E. Kakoulli Constantinou & C. N. Giannikas (eds.), Tertiary Education Language Learning: A Collection of Research (7-28). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.51.1252
Krieger, S. H., Neumann Jr, R. K. & Hutchins, R. M. (2022). Essential Lawyering Skills: Interviewing, Counseling, Negotiation, and Persuasive Fact Analysis. Aspen Publishing.
Krois-Lindner, A. (2006). International Legal English. Cambridge University Press.
Krois-Lindner, A., M. Firth & Translegal (2008). Introduction to International Legal English. Cambridge University Press.
Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal 64(4), 367-375.
Lew, M.D.N. & H. G. Schmidt (2011) Self-reflection and academic performance: is there a relationship?. Adv in Health Sci Educ 16, 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9298-z
Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-native Speakers. Cambridge University Press.
Mercer, S. (2021). An agenda for well-being in ELT: an ecological perspective. ELT Journal 75(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa062
Mercer, S. & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging Language Learners in Contemporary Classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Piccardo, E., North, B. & Goodier, T. (2019). Broadening the scope of language education: Mediation, plurilingualism, and collaborative learning: The CEFR companion volume. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society 15(1).
Schwarcz, D. & Choi, J. H. (2023). AI tools for lawyers: A practical guide (March 29, 2023). 108 Minnesota Law Review Headnotes 1. Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4404017 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404017
Shultz M. M. & Zedeck, S. (2011). Predicting lawyer effectiveness: Broadening the basis for law school admission decisions. Law & Social Inquiry 36(3), 620-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01245.x
Stathopoulou, M. (2015) Cross-language Mediation in Language Teaching and Testing. Multilingual Matters.
Stathopoulou, M. (2019). The reading-to-write construct across languages: Analysing written mediation tasks and performance. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 23, 414-428.
Tessuto, G. (2012). Investigating Legal English Genres in Academic and Professional Contexts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tokarz, K., Sedillo Lopez, A., Maisel, P. & Seibel, R. F. (2013). Legal education at crossroads: Innovation, integration, and pluralism required. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 43, 11-58.
Truesdale, S. P. (1990). Whole-Body Listening: Developing Active Auditory Skills. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21(3), 183-184.
Tsaoussi, A. I. (2020). Using soft skills courses to inspire law teachers: a new methodology for a more humanistic legal education. The Law Teacher 54(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2018.1563396
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Barbora Chovancova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
