Exploring Multimodal Intersubjective Stance in the Linguistic Landscape of a Danish University

Authors

  • Margrethe Petersen Aarhus University
  • Carmen Daniela Maier Aarhus University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi64.145132

Keywords:

linguistic landscape, multimodality, intersubjective stance, dialogic engagement, dialogic disengagement, linking strategy

Abstract

This article focuses on investigating multimodal signage in a Danish organizational linguistic landscape. We report on the signage study of an indoor university site primarily used by students but open to the public. To identify multimodal means by which sign owners communicate intersubjective stance, the study primarily explores signs targeting students. The stance-taking exploration centres on multimodal dialogic engagement and disengagement strategies. This study shows how consistent usage of multimodal linking strategies reinforce the persuasive messages displayed in the signage. Thus, the study complements and extends previous research on linguistic landscapes by providing novel insights related to multimodal strategies of dialogic engagement and disengagement of signage.

References

Andersen, T. H., Boeriis, M., Maagerø, E., & Tønnessen, E. S. (2015). Social semiotics. Key figures, new directions. Routledge.

Aarhus Universitet (2024). AU’s historie [AU’s history]. https://www.au.dk/om/aus-historie

Aarhus University (2020, July). AU i tal 2019 [AU in figures 2019]. Aarhus University. https://auhist.au.dk/historiske-noegletal/arkiv-for-au-i-tal/au-i-tal-2019

Aarhus University (2023, July). Communicating at a multilingual university: Guidelines for AU administration. https://medarbejdere.au.dk/en/administration/communication/language-and-translation/communicating-at-a-multilingual-university-guidelines-for-au-administration

Aarhus University (2024, February). PhD programmes. https://phd.au.dk/phd-programmes

Aarhus University (2024, October). Vil du læse på AU [Do you want to study at AU]. https://www.au.dk/uddannelse/

Aarhus University (2025, January). International admissions at Aarhus University. https://international.au.dk/education/

Aarhus Kommune [Aarhus Municipality] (n.d.). Aarhus i tal [Aarhus in figures]. https://aarhus.dk/om-kommunen/aarhus-i-tal/aarhus-i-tal

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination (translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist). University of Texas Press.

Baldry, A., Thibault, P. J., (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. Equinox.

Belmonte, I. A., & Porto, M. D. (2020). Multimodal framing devices in European online news. Language & Communication, 71, 55-71.

Bezemer, J. & Jewitt, C. (2022). Social semiotics. In J. Verschueren & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: Manual (1255-1263). John Benjamins.

Blommaert, J. (2020). Are chronotopes helpful?..In S. Kroon & J. Swanenberg (Eds.), Chronotopic identity work. Sociolinguistic analyses of cultural and linguistic phenomena in time and space (pp. 16-24). Multilingual Matters.

Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R. E., & Svejenova, S. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. Organization Studies, 39(5-6), 597-616.

Brown, K. D. (2005). Estonian schoolscapes and the marginalization of regional identity in education. European Education, 37, 78-89.

Brown, K. D. (2012). The linguistic landscape of educational spaces: Language revitalization and schools in southeastern Estonia. In D. Gorter, H. F. Marten & L. van Mensel (Eds.), Minority languages in the linguistic landscape (pp. 281-298). Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, K. D. (2018). Shifts and stability in schoolscapes: Diachronic considerations of southeastern Estonian schools. Linguistics and education, 44, 12-19.

Chen, Y. (2010). Exploring dialogic engagement with readers in multimodal EFL textbooks in China. Visual Communication, 9(4), 485-506.

Chouliaraki, L. (2017). Towards an analytics of mediation. In Jewitt, C. (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (253-274). Routledge.

Djonov, E., & Knox, J. (2014). How-to-analyze webpages. In S. Norris & C.D. Maier (Eds.). Interactions, images and texts. A reader in multimodality (171-195). De Gruyter.

Djonov, E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2012). Normativity and software. A multimodal social semiotic approach). In S. Norris (Ed.), Multimodality in practice. Investigating theory-in-practice-through-methodology (pp. 119-137). Routledge.

Fryer, D. L., (2013). Exploring the dialogism of academic discourse: Heteroglossic engagement in medical research articles. In G. Andersen & K. Bech (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Variation in time, space and genre (183-207). Rodopi.

Fryer, D. L. (2019). Multiplying engagement: Visual-verbal intersemiosis in an online medical research article. In C. Sancho Guinda (Ed.), Engagement in professional genres (157-178). John Benjamins.

Gorter, D. (2006). Introduction: The study of the linguistic landscape as a new approach to multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 1-6.

Gorter, D. (2013). Linguistic landscapes in a multilingual world. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 190-212.

Gorter, D. (2019). Methods and techniques for linguistic landscape research: About definitions, core issues and technological innovations. In M. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource (39-57). Multilingual Matters.

Gorter, D. & Cenoz, J. (2024). A panorama of linguistic landscape studies. Multilingual Matters.

Höllerer, A. M., Jancsary, D., & Grafström, M. (2018). “A picture is worth a thousand words”: Multimodal sensemaking of the global financial crisis. Organization Studies, 39, 621-648.

Höllerer, M. A., van Leeuwen, T., Jancsary, D., Meyer, R. E., Andersen, H.T., & Vaara, E. (2019). Visual and multimodal research in organization and management studies. Routledge.

Huang, C. F. (2021). Displaying care: The neoliberal semiotic landscape of psychological health service posters on a university campus in Hong Kong. In E. Krompák, V. Fernández-Mallat & S. Meyer (Eds.), Linguistic landscapes and educational spaces (pp. 104-126). Multilingual Matters.

Hull, G., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224-261.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. Pearson.

Hyland K. (2002). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal, 56(4), 351–358.

Hyland, K. (2010). Community and individuality: performing identity in applied linguistics. Written Communication, 27(2), 159-188.

Iedema, R. (2001). Analyzing film and television: A social semiotic account. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (183-204). Sage.

Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.

Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (Eds.) (2010). Semiotic landscapes. Language, image, space. Continuum.

Jewitt, C. (2009). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 15-31). Routledge.

Jewitt, C. (2017). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.) The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (15-31). Routledge.

Knox, J. (2007). Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper homepages. Visual Communication, 6(1), 19-53.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images. The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 23-49.

Linguistic Landscape (2015). Introduction. Linguistic Landscape. A new journal. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 1-5.

Maier, C.D. (2014). Multimodal analysis of new corporate genres. In S. Norris and C.D. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, Images and Texts. A Reader in Multimodality (pp. 93-111). DeGruyter.

Maier, C.D., & Engberg, J. (2021). Harvard Business Review’s reframing of digital communication: From professional expertise to practical guidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 186-197.

Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–75). Oxford University Press.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave.

Martin, J. R., (2015). Jim R. Martin. In T. H. Andersen, M. Boeriis, E. Maagerø, E. S. Tønnesen (Eds.), Social semiotics. Key figures, new directions (pp. 42-69). Routledge.

Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image-text relations in new (old) media. Visual Communication, 4, 337–371.

Moyano, E.J., (2019). Knowledge construction in discussions of research articles in two disciplines in Spanish: the role of resources of appraisal. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 231-246.

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge.

Norris, S. (2019). Systematically working with multimodal data: Research methods in multimodal discourse analysis. Wiley Blackwell.

Norris, S. (2012). Introduction to part I: Primary focus – social actors and their actions. In S. Norris (Ed.), Multimodality in practice. Investigating theory-in-practice-through-methodology (pp. 3-6). Routledge.

O’Halloran, K. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. Continuum.

Pérez-Llantada Auría, C. (2011), Heteroglossic (dis)engagement and the construal of the ideal readership: dialogic spaces in academic texts. In V. Bhatia, P. S. Hernández & P. Pérez-Paredes (Eds.), Researching specialized languages (25-45). John Benjamins.

Pütz, M., & Mundt, N. (2019). Multilingualism, multimodality and methodology: Linguistic landscape research in the context of assemblages, ideologies and (in)visibility: An introduction. In M. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape. Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource. Multilingual Matters.

Ravazzani, S., & Maier, C.D. (2017). Strategic organizational discourse and framing in hypermodal spaces. Corporate Communications, 22(4), 507-522.

Ross, A. S., & Caldwell, D. (2020) Going negative: An appraisal analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter. Language & Communication, 20, 13-27.

Royce, T. D. (2016). Intersemiotic complementarity in print advertisements. In N-M. Klug & H. Stöckl (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext (pp. 348-371). DeGruyter.

Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.

Shohamy, E. (2019). Linguistic landscape after a decade: An overview of themes, debates and future directions. In M. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource (25-37). Multilingual Matters.

Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (Eds.), (2009a). Linguistic landscape. Expanding the scenery. Routledge.

Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (2009b). Introduction. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery (pp. 1–10). Routledge.

Simpson, B., & Carroll, B. (2008). Re-viewing ‘role’ in processes of identity construction. Organization 15(1), 29-50.

Spolsky, B. (2009). Prolegomena to a sociolinguistic theory of public signage. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery (25-39). Routledge.

Statistics Denmark (n.d.). Population figures. Development in the number of inhabitants since 1901. https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/borgere/befolkning/befolkningstal

Tan, S. (2010). Modelling engagement in a web-based advertising campaign. Visual Communication, 9(1), 91-115.

Thibault, P. (2000). The multimodal transcription of a television advertisement: Theory and practice. In A. Baldry (Ed.), Multimodality and multimediality in the distance learning age (pp. 311-385. Palladino Editore.

van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Typographic meaning. Visual Communication, 4(2), 137–142.

van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 139–155.

van Leeuwen, T. (2011). The language of colour: An introduction. Routledge.

Weatherall, A., Keevallik, L., La, J., Dowell, T., & Stubbe, M. (2021). The multimodality and temporality of pain displays. Language & Communication, 80, 56-70.

White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of the intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259-284.

Xu, X., & Nesi, H. (2019). Differences in engagement: A comparison of the strategies used by British and Chinese research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 121-134.

Forside

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Petersen, M., & Maier, C. D. (2024). Exploring Multimodal Intersubjective Stance in the Linguistic Landscape of a Danish University. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (64), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi64.145132