Discourse Analysis of the 2022 Australian Tennis Open: A Multimodal Appraisal Perspective

Authors

  • Nickolas Komninos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi63.140134

Keywords:

Appraisal Theory, Discourse Analysis, Multimodality, Visual Attitude, Paralanguage, Multimodal Corpus

Abstract

This article presents a preliminary analysis of a corpus of texts relating to the 2022 Australian Tennis Open using a multimodal appraisal framework. The study utilises quantitative and qualitative content analysis to examine media reports, official statements, and public reactions to the incident, which centred around Novak Djokovic's vaccination status. The analysis focusses on assessing how evaluative language contributes to community-building and identifies the underlying values, beliefs, and evaluations that shape stakeholders' emotional, cognitive, and behavioural responses.
The appraisal framework, encompassing attitude, engagement, and graduation, serves as a comprehensive tool for categorising resources that express evaluation. Furthermore, the article delves into the application of appraisal analysis within the context of multimodal and online discourse, encompassing various platforms such as newspapers, television, radio, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, blogs, official political statements, and court rulings. By examining these diverse media, the study seeks to investigate the dynamic discourse interplay surrounding the 2022 Australian Open, highlighting the pivotal role of evaluative communication in fostering alignment among readers through shared values and attitudes.
The preliminary findings suggest that access to greater semiotic recourses increases consensus. The gains from using this interpretative framework are an asset, facilitating the coding of a large data set and attending the different manifestations of discourses around the player’s participation. As discourse continues to shape societal narratives, this multimodal appraisal investigation contributes to our understanding of the complex dynamics inherent in discourse construction and the influence of evaluative language in shaping collective perception.

References

Baldry, A., & Kantz, D. (2022). Corpus-assisted approaches to online multimodal discourse analysis of videos. Analysing Multimodality in Specialized Discourse Settings: Innovative Research Methods and Applications, 1-22.

Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook (p. 4). London: Equinox.

Cavasso, L., & Taboada, M. (2021). A corpus analysis of online news comments using the Appraisal framework. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 4, 1-38.

Drasovean, A., & Tagg, C. (2015). Evaluative language and its solidarity-building role on TED. com: An appraisal and corpus analysis. Language@ Internet, 12.

Economou, D. (2008) 'Pulling readers in: news photos in Greek and Australian broadsheets.' in Communicating conflict: Multilingual case studies of the news media, E. Thomson and P. R. R. White (ed.), London: Continuum, 253-80.

Economou, D. (2009) Photos in the News: appraisal analysis of visual semiosis and verbal-visual intersemiosis, Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.

Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2004). Analysing casual conversation. Equinox Publishing Ltd..

Federal Court of Australia. (2022a). Novak Djokovic applicant minister for home affairs. https://fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/95058/Order-Djokovic-v-Minister-MLG35-of-2022_10-January-2022-003.pdf

Federal Court of Australia. (2022b). Djokovic affidavit. https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/95050/Affidavit-of-Novak-Djokovic-sworn-on-10-January-2022.pdf

Federal Court of Australia. (2022c). Djokovic court filing. https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/95236/Sealed-Affidavit-Bannister-1512022.pdf

Federal Court of Australia. (2022d). Djokovic v minister for immigration, citizenship, migrant services and multicultural affairs [2022] FCAFC 3 https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2022/2022fcafc0003

Federal Court of Australia. (2022e). Applicant’s outline of submissions. https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/95243/sealed-Applicants-revised-Submissions-1512022.pdf

Federal Court of Australia. (2022f). Djokovic v minister for immigration, citizenship, migrant services and multicultural affairs. https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/services/access-to-files-and-transcripts/fcfcoa/djokovic/Judgment-2022-FedCFamC2G-7.pdf

Federal Court of Australia (2022g) Notice of Filing VID17/2022 https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/95243/sealed-Applicants-revised-Submissions-1512022.pdf

Fuoli, M. (2018). A stepwise method for annotating APPRAISAL. Functions of Language, 25(2), 229-258.

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1996) On grammar and grammatics. In Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, ed. R. Hasan, C. Cloran, and D. Butt. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the Grammar of English.

Hao, J., & Hood, S. (2019). Valuing science: The role of language and body language in a health science lecture. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 200-215.

Higgins, A. (2022). Novak Djokovic through Australia’s Pandemic Looking Glass: Denied Natural Justice, Faulted by Open Justice and Failed by a Legal System Unable to Stop the Arbitrary Use of State Power. Civil Justice Quarterly, 42.

Hommerberg, C., & Don, A. (2015). Appraisal and the language of wine appreciation: A critical discussion of the potential of the Appraisal framework as a tool to analyse specialised genres. Functions of Language, 22(2), 161-191. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.2.01hom

Kampmark, B. (2022). The trouble with God powers: The Novak Djokovic case. Eureka Street, 32(2), 14-17. https://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article/the-trouble-with-god-powers--the-novak-djokovic-case

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers

Komninos, N. (2011). Searching for Coherence: An Exercise in Multi-Translator Translation in Identities in Transition in the English-Speaking World. Udine: Forum (pp.331-346) DOI:10.1400/183375

Martin, J. R. (2017). The discourse semantics of attitudinal relations: Continuing the study of lexis. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 22-47. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-22-47

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martin, J. R., & Zappavigna, M. (2019). Embodied meaning: A systemic functional perspective on paralanguage. Functional Linguistics, 6(1), 1-33.

Mills, K. A., Stone, B. G., Unsworth, L., & Friend, L. (2020). Multimodal Language of Attitude in Digital Composition. Written Communication, 37(2), 135–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319897978

Ngo, T. (2018). Gesture as transduction of characterisation in children's literature animation adaptation. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(1), 30-43.

Ngo, T., Hood, S., Martin, J. R., Painter, C., Smith, B. A., & Zappavigna, M. (2021). Modelling Paralanguage Using Systemic Functional Semiotics: Theory and Application. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Norris, S. (2019). Systematically working with multimodal data: Research methods in multimodal discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. Companion to Discourse. London and New York: Continuum.

Querol-Julián, M., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2012). Multimodal evaluation in academic discussion sessions: How do presenters act and react?. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 271-283.

Swain, E. (2012) 'Analysing evaluation in political cartoons', Discourse, Context & Media 1 (2), 82-94.

Thompson, G. (2014). Affect and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls. Evaluation in context, 47, 66.

White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.011

White, P. R. (2014). The attitudinal work of news journalism images–a search for visual and verbal analogues.

Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New media & society, 13(5), 788-806.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-27

How to Cite

Komninos, N. (2023). Discourse Analysis of the 2022 Australian Tennis Open: A Multimodal Appraisal Perspective. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (63), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi63.140134

Issue

Section

THEMATIC SECTION: Evaluation, argumentation and narrative(s) in conflicting contexts