Master Narratives in US Contemporary War Discourse: Situating and Constructing Identities of Self and Other
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi63.140132Keywords:
War discourse, Presidential speeches, CDA, otherization, master-/counter-narratives, ITFsAbstract
The present paper aims to discuss the discursive strategies of otherization, legitimation, and normalization typically found in extracts from the author’s video corpus of US Presidents’ selected official statements at the height of actual or potential armed conflicts between the First Gulf War (1990-1991) and the end of the Obama Administration (2016). The underlying working assumption is that, to consolidate asymmetrical power relationships and monitor dissent and/or win domestic consent about the use of force, the US Administration systematically resorts to a relatively restricted inventory of political myths and cultural constructs sustained by strategic storytelling and powerful master narratives, or Intertextual Thematic Formations. The qualitative analysis, informed by a systemic functional, critical discourse approach, is undertaken at both the macro- and micro-levels, with a view to highlighting how master narratives project distinct/conflicting standpoints and socio-institutional roles and identities (e.g. the-President-as-Father-of-the-Nation; the-Community-as-Protector-of-its-Members'-Interests; the-West-as-Civilizer), while feeding the myth of a ‘super-empowered’ President and ultimately sustaining the ideological square. The final contention is that awareness-raising pedagogical models are needed which work upwards from the bottom of the hierarchical narrative structure, contextualizing the master narrative and linking it to the audience’s individual narratives, so that discourse can fulfil its critical function of dismantling potentially manipulative and/or normalizing discourse practices and foster civil society-led, personal counter-narratives that remove stereotyping and oversimplification.
References
Al-Harbi, A.M. (2009). Jargonizing and Abstracting the “War on Terror”: The “Self” and the “Other” Representations. The Linguistics Journal 4/2, 77-109.
Altheide, D.L. (2006). Terrorism and the Politics of Fear. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies 6/4, 415-439.
Baldry, A. & Thibault, P.J. (2008). Applications of Multimodal Concordances. HERMES 41, 11-41.
Bamberg, M. (2004). Considering Counter Narratives. In M. Bamberg & M. Andrews (eds.), Considering Counter Narratives. Narrating, Resisting, Making Sense (351-371). Benjamins.
Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
Benhabib, S. (2002). The Claims of Culture. Princeton University Press.
Betz, D. (2008). The Virtual Dimension of Contemporary Insurgency and Counterinsurgency. Small Wars and Insurgencies 19/4, 510-540.
Butt, D.G., Lukin, A. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004), Grammar – The First Covert Operation of War. Discourse & Society 15/2–3, 267–290.
Cap, P. (2008). Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40, 17-41.
Cap, P. (2017). The Language of Fear. Palgrave.
Cortese, G. (2001). Introduction. In G. Cortese & D. Hymes (eds.), ‘Languaging’ in and across Human Groups. Textus special issue XIV/2, 193-230.
Ekström, M., Patrona, M. & Thornborrow, J. (2022). News Media and the Politics of Fear: Normalization and Contrastive Discourses in the Reporting on Terrorist Attacks in Sweden and the UK. Discourse & Society, DOI: 10.1177/09579265221095409.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity.
Fairclough, N. (1996). Technologisation of Discourse. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (71-83). Routledge.
Farwell, J.P. (2012). Persuasion and Power: The Art of Strategic Communication. Georgetown University Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Harvard University Press.
Goodall, H.L. Jr. (2009). Blood, Shit and Tears: The Terrorist as Abject Other. Paper presented at the Seminar on Abjection and Alterity, University of York (UK), Sept. 23.
Goodall, H.L. Jr. (2016). Counter-Narrative: How Progressive Academics Can Challenge Extremists and Promote Social Justice. Routledge.
Hackett, R. A. & Zhao, Y. (1994). Challenging a Master Narrative. Discourse & Society 5/4, 509-541.
Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Doubleday.
Hall, S. (1997). The Spectacle of the ‘Other’. In S. Hall (ed.), Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (223-290). Open University.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999). Construing Experience: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. Continuum.
Halverson, J.R., Goodall, H.L. & Corman, S.R. (2011). Master Narratives of Islamist Extremism. Palgrave.
Hasan, R. (1988). Language in the Process of Socialisation: Home and School. In J. Oldenburg, T. van Leeuwen & L. Gerot (eds.), Language and Socialisation: Home and School (36-96). North Ryde.
Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1993). Language as Ideology (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hodges, A. (2008). The Politics of Recontextualization: Discursive Competition over Claims of Iranian Involvement in Iraq. Discourse & Society 19/4, 483-505.
Holliday, A. (2011). Intercultural Communication and Ideology. Sage.
Jeffords, S. (2012). Terror, the Imperial Presidency, and American Heroism. In T. Barkawi & K. Stanski (eds.), Orientalism and War (65-82). Hurst & Co.
Johnstone, B. (1996). The Linguistic Individual. O.U.P.
Lemke, J.L. (1988). Discourses in Conflict. In J.D. Benson & W.S. Greaves (eds.), Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse (29-50). Ablex.
Lukin, A. (2019), War and Its Ideologies. A Social-semiotic Theory and Description. Springer.
Martin, J.R. & White P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave.
Mazid, B.E.M. (2008). Cowboy and Misanthrope: A Critical (Discourse) Analysis of Bush and Bin Laden Cartoons. Discourse & Communication 2/4, 433-457.
McIntosh, C. (2022). A ‘Continuing, Imminent’ Threat: The Temporal Frameworks Enabling the US War on Terrorism. International Relations 36/4, 568-590.
Melchior, C. & Romoli, A. (eds.) (2018). La strategia della persuasione. Comunicazione e media nell’era della post-verità. Franco Angeli.
Norris, S. & Jones, R.H. (eds.) (2005). Discourse in Action. Routledge.
Pelclová, J. & Lu, W. (eds.) (2018). Persuasion in Public Discourse. Cognitive and Functional Perspectives. Benjamins.
Reese, S.D. & Buchalew, B. (1995). The Militarism of Local Television: The Routine Framing of the Persian Gulf War. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12, 40-59.
Richardson, J.E. [2004](2009). (Mis)Representing Islam. The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Benjamins.
Ruston, S.E. & Halverson, J.R. (2014). ‘Counter’ or ‘Alternative’: Contesting Video Narratives of Violent Islamist Extremism. In C.K. Winkler & C.E. Dauber (eds.), Visual Propaganda and Extremism in the Online Environment (105-133). US Army War College Press.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Penguin.
Schiffrin, D. (1996). Narrative as Self-Portrait : Sociolinguistic Construction of Identity. Language in Society 25/2, 167-203.
Stocchetti, M. (2007). The Politics of Fear. A Critical Inquiry into the Role of Violence in 21st Century Politics. In A. Hodges & C. Nilep (eds.), Discourse, War and Terrorism (223-241). Benjamins.
Taibi, D. (2020). Section 7. OpenMWS. In A. Baldry et al. The MWSWeb Project. Lingue e Linguaggi 40, 433-472.
Taibi, D. (2022). Learning Analytics in Support of Video Corpus Construction and Exploration. ECEL 2021, 450-459.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics 4, 91-112.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1985). Toward a Theory of Conflict and Culture. In W.B. Gudykunst, L.P. Stewart, S. Ting-Toomey (eds.), Communication, Culture, and Organizational Processes (71-86). Sage.
van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Power: Contributions to Critical Discourse Studies. Palgrave.
van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in Discourse and Communication. Discourse & Communication 1/1, 91-112.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. O.U.P.
Vasta, N. (1999). The Semantics of Conflict: The System of Power and Solidarity in Official Statements during the Gulf War. In M.M. Mechel, Vasta & C. Chiaruttini Leggeri (eds.), Rappresentazioni dell'identità: la dimensione linguistica del conflitto (115-153). CEDAM.
Vasta, N. (2004a). ‘Sport a Yellow Ribbon’ and Other Strategies for Raising Public Opinion’s Consensus on Military Actions in Iraq. In C. Dente & S. Soncini (eds.), Conflict Zones (115-151). ETS.
Vasta, N. (2004b). Consent and Dissent in British and Italian Parliamentary Debates. In P. Bayley (ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse (111-149). Benjamins.
Vasta, N. (2016). Identities in Conflict: Making Sense of Voices from inside the War on Terror. In S. Campagna et al. (eds.), Languaging in and across Communities (199-222). Peter Lang.
Vasta, N. & Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. (2009). Introduction. In N. Vasta & C.R. Caldas-Coulthard (eds.), Identity Construction and Positioning in Discourse and Society. Textus special issue XXII/1, 3-22.
Vasta, N. & Martorana, V. (2018). Minaccia alla sicurezza e uso della forza: la fluidità del linguaggio politico-istituzionale. In C. Melchior & A. Romoli (eds.), La strategia della persuasione (155-190). Franco Angeli.
Witkowska, J. & Zagratzki, U. (eds.) (2014). Ideological Battlegrounds - Constructions of Us and Them Before and After 9/11, Vol. 1. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Wodak, R. [2015](2021). The Politics of Fear (2nd ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nicoletta Vasta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
