En utrednings forventninger

Fortidens fremtiding av en datadrevet forvaltning

Forfattere

  • Redaktionssekretær Kulturstudier

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/ks.v2024i2.152408

Nøgleord:

datapolitikk, forvaltning, fremtiding, forventninger, fremtidsforestillinger

Resumé

Denne artikkelen undersøker hvordan en norsk o!entlig utredning (NOU) publisert i 1978 fremskriver en fremtidig forvaltning hvor datainfrastrukturen skal få en stadig større plass. Gjennom en praksisorientert dokumentanalyse og et teoretisk rammeverk for fremtiding, utforskes spørsmål om hva slags forventninger utredningen har til datateknologien og betingelsene disse baserer seg på. Denne analysen bidrar med en refleksjon over hvordan kollektive ideer og sosiotekniske begjær skapes i møtepunktet mellom ulike betingelser, aktører og teknologier. Den peker også mot en mer kritisk tilnærming til nåtidens forventninger til fremtidig datateknologi og hva den kan utrette, forventninger som bør sees i lys av tidligere fremtider.

Referencer

Anderson, Benedict 2006: Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and

spread of nationalism. 3. utg. London: Routledge.

Appadurai, Arjun 1996: Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Bd.

Unviersity of Minnesota Press.

Asdal, Kristin 2004: Politikkens teknologier. Det historisk-filosofiske fakultet,

Universitetet i Oslo.

Asdal, Kristin 2008: “On politics and the little tools of democracy: A down-to-earth

approach”. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 9 (1), s.11–26.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2008.9672953.

Asdal, Kristin 2012: “Contexts in Action—And the Future of the Past in STS”.

Science, Technology, & Human Values 37 (4), s. 379–403. https://doi.

org/10.1177/0162243912438271.

Asdal, Kristin 2015: “What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents”.

Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16 (1),s. 74–90. https://doi.org/1

1080/1600910X.2015.1022194.

Asdal, Kristin, og Bård Hobæk. 2016. “Assembling the whale: Parliaments in the

politics of nature”. Science as Culture 25 (1): 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505

2015.1093744.

Asdal, Kristin 2020: “The modified issue: Turning around parliaments, politics as

usual and how to extend issue-politics with a little help from Max Weber”. Social

Studies of Science 50 (2), s. 252–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720902847.

Asdal, Kristin, og Helge Jordheim 2018: “Texts on the move: Textuality and historicity

revisited”. History and Theory 57 (1). s. 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12046.

Asdal, Kristin, og Hilde Reinertsen 2022: Doing document analysis: A practiceoriented method. London: Sage.

Bansler, Jørgen 1989: “Systems development research in Scandinavia: Three

theoretical schools”. Scandinavian journal of information systems 1 (1), s. 3–23.

Bardin, Andrea 2021: “Simondon contra new materialism: Political

anthropology reloaded”. Theory, Culture & Society 38 (5), s. 25–44. https://doi.

org/10.1177/02632764211012047.

Bauer, Susanne 2014: “From Administrative Infrastructure to Biomedical

Resource: Danish Population Registries, the “Scandinavian Laboratory,” and

the “Epidemiologist’s Dream”“. Science in context 27 (2), s. 187–213. https://doi.

org/10.1017/S0269889714000040.

Borup, Mads, Nik Brown, Kornelia Konrad, og Harro Van Lente 2006: “The sociology

of expectations in science and technology”. Technology analysis & strategic

management 18 (3–4), s. 285–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002.

Bowker, Geo!rey C., og Susan Leigh Star 1999: Sorting things out: Classification and

its consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Boyd-Barrett, Oliver 2006: “Cyberspace, globalization and empire”. Global media and

communication 2 (1), s. 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766506061815.

Brandal, Nik, Øivind Bratberg, og Dag Einar Thorsen 2013: The Nordic Model of

Social Democracy. 1. utg. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Broomfield, Heather og Lisa Marie Reutter 2021: “Towards a data-driven public

administration: An empirical analysis of nascent phase implementation”.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 25 (2), s. 73–97. https://doi.

org/10.58235/sjpa.v25i2.7117.

Buland, Trond 1996: Den store planen: Norges satsing på informasjonsteknologi,

-1990. Senter for teknologi og samfunn, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige

universitetet.

Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1987. The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge,

Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Christensen, Johan og Stine Hesstvedt 2023: “The influence of expert groups: a

citation analysis”. Journal of European Public Policy 31 (5), s. 1–36. https://doi.org/

1080/13501763.2023.2174168.

Christensen, Johan og Cathrine Holst 2017: “Advisory commissions, academic

expertise and democratic legitimacy: The case of Norway”. science and public

policy 44 (6), s. 821–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx016.

Christensen, Tom 2006: “Staten og reformenes forunderlige verden”. Nytt norsk

tidsskri# 23 (3), s. 215–26. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3053-2006-03-03.

Danielsen, Reidar 1946: Rasjonalisering. Opplysningskomiteen for

Gjenreisningsarbeidet, Nr. 7. Oslo: Universitetsbiblioteket i Oslo.

DeNardis, Laura 2009: Protocol politics: The globalization of Internet governance.

Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Easterling, Keller 2014: Extrastatecra#: The power of infrastructure space. Verso Books.

Elgsaas, Knut og Håvard Hegna 2009: “The Development of Computer Policies in

Government, Political Parties, and Trade Unions in Norway 1961–1983”. I History

of Nordic Computing 2: Second IFIP WG 9.7 Conference, HiNC2, Turku, Finland,

August 21-23, 2007, Revised Selected Papers 2, s. 156–70. Springer.

Forbruker- og administrasjonsdepartementet 1982: “Desentralisering og

e!ektivisering i den o!entlige databehandling og spørsmålet om datapolitiske

organer”. St.meld Nr.12 1982-83.

Fuist, Todd Nicholas 2021: “Towards a sociology of imagination”. Theory and Society

(2), s. 357–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09416-y.

Galloway, Alexander 2004: Protocol: How control exists a#er decentralisation.

Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Gugerli, David 2022: How the World Got Into the Computer: The Emergence of Digital

Reality. Zurich: Chronos Verlag.

Henke, Christopher og Benjamin Sims 2020: “Repairing Infrastructures : The

Maintenance of Materiality and Power”. Infrastructures Series. Cambridge,

Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Hoeyer, Klaus 2019: “Data as promise: Reconfiguring Danish public health through

personalized medicine”. Social studies of science 49 (4), s. 531–55. https://doi.

org/10.1177/0306312719858697.

Hong, Sun-ha 2020: Technologies of speculation: The limits of knowledge in a data-driven society. New York: New York University Press.

Innset, Ola 2020: Markedsvendingen : nyliberalismens historie i Norge. 1. utg. Bergen:

Fagbokforlaget.

Jansen, Arild 2008: “Fra EMMA til Altinn”. I Elektronisk forvaltning på norsk. Statlig

og kommunal bruk av IKT., av Arild Jansen og Dag Wiese Schartum, s. 63–89.

Bergen: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS.

Jansen, Arild, og Ivar Berg-Jacobsen 2011: “Styring av den elektroniske forvaltning i

Norge-en tilstandsrapport”. I Complex, s. 1–55.

Jansen, Arild og Dag Wiese Schartum 2008: Elektronisk forvaltning på norsk: statlig

og kommunal bruk av IKT. Fagbokforlaget.

Jasanoff, Sheila 2004: States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social

order. London: Routledge.

Jasano!, Sheila 2005: Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the

United States. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Jasano!, Sheila og Sang-Hyun Kim 2015: Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical

imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Krick, Eva og Cathrine Holst 2021: “Governance by Hybrid Advisory Committees–A

Hallmark of Social Democracy?” I Social Democracy in the 21st Century, redigert

av N Brandal, Ø Bratberg, og D Thorsen, 35, s. 113–30. Leeds: Emerald Publishing

Limited.

Larkin, Brian 2018: “Promising forms: The political aesthetics of infrastructure”. I

The promise of infrastructure, redigert av Nikhil Anand, Akhil Gupta, og Hannah Appel, s. 175–202. Durham: Duke University Press.

Lie, Einar og Hege Roll-Hansen 2001: “Faktisk talt : statistikkens historie i Norge”. Oslo: Universitetsforl.

Lie, Einar og Christian Venneslan 2010: Over evne. Finansdepartementet 1965–1992. Oslo: Pax Forlag.

Lundin, Per 2015: “Computers and Welfare: The Swedish Debate on the Politics of

Computerization in the 1970s and the 1980s”. I History of Nordic Computing 4:

th IFIP WG 9.7 Conference, HiNC 4, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 13-15, 2014,

Revised Selected Papers 4, s. 3–11. Springer.

Madsbu, Jens Petter 2016: Samordning, effektivisering og forenkling – En sosiologisk

analyse av begrunnelser for digitaliseringsprosesser i moderniseringen av norsk

offentlig forvaltning. Karlstad University Studies.

Marres, Noortje 2007: “The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to

the study of public involvement in controversy”. Social studies of science 37 (5), s.

–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706077367.

Nora, Simon og Alain Minc 1980: Computerization of society: a report to the President

of France. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

NOU 1973:43: “Om planlegging av databehandling i forvaltningen”. Avgitt til

Forbruker og admininstrasjonsdepartementet.

NOU 1978:48: “Oftentlig databehandling – Desentralisering og e!ektivisering”.

Avgitt til Forbruker og admininstrasjonsdepartementet.

NOU 1988:40: “Datapolitikk i 1990-årene”. Avgitt til Forbruker og

admininstrasjonsdepartementet.

NOU 1989:5: “En bedre organisert stat”. Avgitt til Forbruker og

admininstrasjonsdepartementet.

Nygaard, Kristen og Olav Terje Bergo 1974: Planlegging, styring og databehandling.

Grunnbok for Fagbevegelsen. Del 1 Innføring. Sandvika: Tiden Norsk Forlag.

OECD 1973: “The use of computers and telecommunications – Towards an

international policy”. I The OECD Observer.

Oever, Niels ten 2021: ““This is not how we imagined it”: Technological affordances,

economic drivers, and the Internet architecture imaginary”. new media & society

(2), s. 344–62.

Oever, Niels ten 2023: “5G and the notion of network ideology, or: the limitations of

sociotechnical imaginaries”. Telecommunications Policy 47 (5), s. 1–11. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102442.

Oomen, Jeroen, Jesse Ho!man og Maarten A. Hajer 2022: “Techniques of futuring:

On how imagined futures become socially performative”. European Journal of

Social Theory 25 (2), s. 252–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431020988826.

Parthasarathy, Balaji og Janaki Srinivasan 2008: “How the Development of ICTs

A!ects ICTs for Development: Social Contestation in the Shaping of Standards

for the Information Age”. Science, Technology and Society 13 (2), s. 279–301.

https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180801300206.

Porter, Theodore M 1996: Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and

public life. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Russell, Andrew L 2012: “Standards, networks, and critique”. IEEE Annals of the

History of Computing 34 (3), s. 78–80.

Russell, Andrew L 2014: Open standards and the digital age. Cambridge University

Press.

Sato, Yoshiyuki 2022: Power and Resistance: Foucault, Deleuze, Derrida, Althusser. London: Verso Books.

Stortingsforhandlinger 1970: “Interp. Sak nr.6”. I . Stortingsforhandlinger Vol. 115 Nr. 7b.

Suchman, Lucy 1987: Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine

communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles 2004: Modern social imaginaries. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Toubeau, Simon 2021: “Social Democracy and the ‘Territorial Question’: Understanding the Attitudes of Social Democratic Parties towards Decentralisation”. I Social Democracy in the 21st Century, s. 161–93. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Weber, Max 2019: Economy and society – A new translation. w. Cambridge,

Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Wetlesen, Tone Schou 1975: Rasjonalisering og Forvaltningspolitikk- En

studie av Rasjonaliseringsdirektoratets virksomhet 1948-1972. Institutt for Samfunnsforskning, Universitetet i Bergen.

Wetlesen, Tone Schou 1977: “Grenser for eftektivitet”. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 18, s. 27–46.

Wiegmann, Paul Moritz, Henk J. de Vries og Knut Blind 2017: “Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda”. Research Policy 46 (8), s. 1370–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.002.

Winner, Langdon 1980: “Do artifacts have politics?” Daedalus 109 (1), s. 121–36.

Downloads

Publiceret

2024-12-21

Citation/Eksport

Kulturstudier, R. (2024). En utrednings forventninger: Fortidens fremtiding av en datadrevet forvaltning. Kulturstudier, 14(2), 66–93. https://doi.org/10.7146/ks.v2024i2.152408