Lukas’ evangelium, fortolket af Niels Willert
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/dtt.v87i2.145340Nøgleord:
Review, Gospel of Luke, Niels Willert, Synoptic Problem, Luke-Acts, Dating, Relation between Luke and JohnResumé
The article reviews Niels Willert’s commentary on the Gospel of Luke. On the one hand, the book presents a solid traditional analysis of the gospel. The interpretation lives up to international research. It is welcome in a Danish context and will be of benefit for many readers of the New Testament. On the other hand, it has a provocative profile and challenges accepted views. It promotes controversial ideas: It sees Luke-Acts as one single work in two volumes. It dates the Lukan writings extremely late, i.e. 120-140. It adheres to the Farrer-hypothesis concerning the synoptic problem. It takes the Gospel of John to be among Luke’s sources. These ideas are discussed critically in the review, and arguments are raised against the late dating and the relation to the Fourth Gospel. However, the conclusion is that these hypotheses do not affect the exegesis of the individual pericopes. Therefore, the commentary is warmly recommended for all serious readers of the Gospel of Luke.
Referencer
Bird, Michael F. 2007. “The Unity of Luke—Acts in Recent Discussion.” JSNT 29 (4): 425-48.
Bovon, Francois. 1989. Das Evangelium Nach Lukas (1,1-9,50). EKK, III/1. Ostfildern: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
—, 1996. Das Evangelium nach Lukas (9,51-14,35). EKK, III/2. Ostfildern: Verlagsgruppe Patmos.
—, 2001. Das Evangelium nach Lukas (15,1-19,27). Redigeret af Joachim Gnilka, Hans-Josef Klauck, Ulrich Luz, og Jurgen Roloff. EKK, III/3. Zürich: Neukirchener Theologie/Verlagsgruppe Patmos.
—, 2009. Das Evangelium nach Lukas (19,28-24,53). EKK, III/4. Zürich: Neukirchener Theologie/Verlagsgruppe Patmos.
Cadbury, Henry Joel. 1919. The Style and Literary Method of Luke: I-II. Harvard Theological Studies 6. Cambridge.
—, 1927. The Making of Luke-Acts. New York.
Cobb, Christy. 2019. Slavery, Gender, Truth, and Power in Luke-Acts and Other Ancient Narratives. 1. udg. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05689-6.
Farrer, Austin M. 1955. “On Dispensing with Q.” I Studies in the Gospels: Essays in Memory of R. H. Lightfoot, red. D. E. Nineham. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Garrett, Susan R. 1989. The Demise of the Devil: Magic and the Demonic in Luke’s Writings. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Goodacre, Mark. 2002. The Case against Q: Studies in Markan Priority and the Synoptic Problem. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.
Goulder, Michael D. 1989. Luke, a New Paradigm. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 20. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Green, Joel B. 2007. The Gospel of Luke. New International Commentary. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
Hyldahl, Niels. 2011. “Über Die Abfassungszeit Des Lukanischen Doppelwerks.” I Frühes Christentum Und Religionsgeschichtliche Schule: Festschrift Zum 65. Geburtstag von Gerd Lüdemann, red. Martina Janßen, F. Stanley Jones og Jürgen Wehnert, 75–82. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Jacob, Sharon. 2015. Reading Mary Alongside Indian Surrogate Mothers: Violent Love, Oppressive Liberation, and Infancy Narratives. The Bible and Cultural Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lawrence, Louise J. 2013. Sense and Stigma in the Gospels: Depictions of Sensory-Disabled Characters. Biblical Refigurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levine, Amy-Jill. 2002. A Feminist Companion to Luke. Feminist Companion to the New Testament and Early Christian Writings 3. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Levine, Amy-Jill, og Ben Witherington. 2018. The Gospel of Luke. New Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Müller, Mogens. 2000. Kommentar til Matthæusevangeliet. Dansk kommentar til Det nye Testamente (DKNT) 3. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
—, 2011. “Receptionen af Det Gamle Testamente I Matthæusevangeliet og Lukasskrifterne. Fra tolkning til skriftbevis.” I Skriften i skriften: mellem tradition og reception; fjorten afhandlinger, 2. ændrede udgave, 70–84. Publikationer fra Det Teologiske Fakultet 22. København: Det Teologiske Fakultet.
—, 2012. “Luke – the Fourth Gospel? The ‘Rewritten Bible’ Concept as a Way to Understand the Nature of the Later Gospels.” I Voces Clamantium in Deserto: Essays in Honor of Kari Syreeni, red. Sven-Olav Back og Matti Kankaanniemi, 231–42. Åbo: Åbo Akademi, Teologiska fakulteten.
—, 2015. Evangeliet og evangelierne: evangelierne som bibelske genskrivninger. Frederiksberg: Anis.
—, 2021. Evangelierne. Teologisk folkebibliotek. København: Vandkunsten.
—, 2023. Kommentar til Romerbrevet. Dansk kommentar til Det nye testamente (DKNT) 7. Frederiksberg: Eksistensen.
Müller, Mogens, og Heike Omerzu. 2018. Gospel Interpretation and the Q-Hypothesis. International Studies on Christian Origins. London; New York: Bloomsbury T & T Clark.
Nielsen, Helge Kjær. 2007. Kommentar til Johannesevangeliet. Dansk kommentar til Det nye Testamente (DKNT) 4. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Nielsen, Jesper Tang. 2016. “Introduction.” I Luke’s Literary Creativity, red. Mogens Müller og Jesper Tang Nielsen, xiii–xxvii. LNTS 550. London: Bloomsbury UK.
—, 2018. “Johannes und Lukas. Szenen einer Beziehung.” I Rewriting and Reception in and of the Bible. FS Mogens Müller, red. Jesper Høgenhaven, Heike Omerzu og Jesper Tang Nielsen, 125–62. WUNT 396. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Parsons, Mikeal C. 2015. Luke. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
Parsons, Mikeal C., og Richard I. Pervo. 1993. Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Pedersen, Sigfred. 1994a. Den nytestamentlige tids historie. Dansk kommentar til Det nye testamente (DKNT) 2. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
—, 1994b. Skriftsyn og metode: om den nytestamentlige hermeneutik. Dansk kommentar til Det nye Testamente (DKNT) 1. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
—, 2007. Skriftsyn og metode: Om den nytestamentlige hermeneutik. 2. rev. og udv. Udgave. Dansk kommentar til Det nye testamente (DKNT) 1. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Pilgaard, Aage. 2008. Kommentar til Markusevangeliet. Dansk kommentar til Det nye testamente (DKNT) 5. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Rowe, Kavin C. 2010. Rethinking the Unity and Reception of Luke and Acts. Redigeret af Andrew F. Gregory. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Svendsen, Stefan Nordgaard. 2017. Possessions and Family in the Writings of Luke: Questioning in the Unity of Luke’s Ethics. København: Museum Tusculanum.
Weissenrieder, Annette. 2003. Images of Illness in the Gospel of Luke: Insights of Ancient Medical Texts. WUNT 2 148. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Willert, Niels. 2017. Kristendommens påskefortællinger: litterære, teologiske og historiske perspektiver på evangeliernes passionsfortællinger som bibelske genskrivninger. Antikken og kristendommen 12. København: Eksistensen.
Wilson, Brittany E. 2015. Unmanly Men: Refigurations of Masculinity in Luke-Acts. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wolter, Michael. 2008. Das Lukasevangelium. Handbuch zum Neuen Testament 5. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
