Eudaimonisme og anti-eudaimonisme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/dtt.v73i3.106428Nøgleord:
Disinterestedness, self-sacrifice, psychological egoism, the history of moral thinking, 17th-century theologyResumé
The quality of disinterestedness is generally thought to be the defining feature of the moral act. As a result, much of modern moral thinking promotes some idea of self-sacrifice. It is the contention of the present article that this tendency is unfortunate. At the same time, it suggests that the opposite view – namely that human beings are by nature ineradicably selfish – is equally problematic. The article traces the origins of these two positions to the quarrel over pure love at the end of the 17th century and discusses the views of its two main protagonists, François Fénelon and Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet. In the final third, the article turns to the 20th century, particularly to German philosopher Robert Spaemann. It thereby includes a suggestion of how the modern paradigm of disinterestedness may be dissolved through a phenomenological analysis of love.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
For årgange indtil 2008 tilhører copyright forfatteren og Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift.
For årgangene 2008-2025 tilhører copyright forfatteren og Eksistensen Akademisk.
Artikler udgivet 2008-2025 må læsere downloade, linke til, og citere. Man må ikke ændre i teksten og heller ikke videreformidle artikler eller dele af artikler til kommercielt brug.
For årgange fra 2026 tilhører copyright forfatteren.
Fra 2026 udgives artikler i Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift under en Creative Commons-licens: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
![]()