One Step Forward and Two Steps Back: Addressing Brazil's Structural Constraints to Move on with the Global South as a Political Project
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
The ideals of the Global South designed the possibility of a shared political project across developing States, in which they could strengthen their bonds to achieve mutual interests through South-South cooperation. However, materialising such ideals is still an accomplishment to be completed, surrounded by structural circumstances at both international and domestic levels. Considering how this situation affects the relationship between Brazilian South-South Cooperation and the construction of the Global South as a political project, we aimed to explore the mentioned structural challenges. We focused on two axes: the remaining issues throughout the construction of the Global South as an alternative perspective in International Relations and the changes in the Brazilian position regarding this agenda, directly related to governmental transitions. Among other causes, lack of coordination and institutional memory mechanisms were found to be the main issues, fostering further debate and thoughts.
Detalhes do artigo
Articles published in Brasiliana are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Referências
Abdenur, A.E. and de Souza Neto, D.M. (2013) ‘Brazil in the South Atlantic: growing protagonism and unintended consequences’, Policy Brief, Oslo Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre [Preprint]. Available at: http://www.peacebuilding.no/var/ezflow_site/storage/original/application/7f8201c01207875357d3052f3dbe3965.pdf (Accessed: 14 September 2014).
Axelrod, R. and Keohane, R.O. (1985) ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, World Politics, 38(1), pp. 226–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357.
Ayllón Pino, B. (ed.) (2013) La cooperación Sur-Sur y triangular: ¿subversión o adaptación de la cooperación internacional? Quito: IAEN (Colección de estudios en política internacional).
Ayllón Pino, B. (2014a) in América Latina na Cooperação Internacional para o Desenvolvimento. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil: IPEA, pp. 175–202.
Ayllón Pino, B. (2014b) in A Evolução Histórica da Cooperação Sul-Sul (CSS). Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil: IPEA, pp. 57–86.
Bielschowsky, R. and Vereinte Nationen (eds) (2000a) Cinqüenta anos de pensamento na CEPAL. Vol. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Record [u.a.].
Bielschowsky, R. and Vereinte Nationen (eds) (2000b) Cinqüenta anos de pensamento na CEPAL. Vol. 2. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Record [u.a.].
Bräutigam, D. and Gallagher, K.P. (2014) ‘Bartering Globalization: China’s Commodity-backed Finance in Africa and Latin America’, Global Policy, 5(3), pp. 346–352. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12138.
Carr, E.H. (2001) Vinte Anos de Crise. 1919 - 1939. Uma Introdução ao Estudo das Relações Internacionais. 2nd edn. São Paulo: Imprensa Oficial do Estado de São Paulo.
Carvalho, A.L.V.C. (2021) MIDDLE POWERS’ GRAND STRATEGY: the case of Brazil from Cardoso to Lula. Master’s Thesis. State University of Paraíba.
Chimienti, A. and Creutzfeldt, B. (2016) ‘Who wants what for Latin America?: Voices For and Against the China-Backed Extractivist Development Model’, in The Political Economy of China–Latin America Relations in the New Millennium. Routledge.
Faoro, R. (1958) Os donos do poder: Formação do patronato político brasileiro. 1st edn. São Paulo: Globo.
Fernandes, F. (1976) A revolução burguesa no Brasil: ensaio de interpretação sociológica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Fernandes, F. (2008) Sociedade de classes e subdesenvolvimento. Global Editora.
Fiori, J. (2016) ‘Brasil muda rota’, Carta Maior, 7 November. Available at: https://www.cartamaior.com.br/?/Editoria/Politica/Brasil-muda-rota/4/37176 (Accessed: 15 May 2022).
Gallagher, K.P. (2016) The China Triangle: Latin America’s China Boom and the Fate of the Washington Consensus. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, K.P. and Irwin, A. (2015) ‘China’s Economic Statecraft in Latin America: Evidence from China’s Policy Banks’, Pacific Affairs, 88(1), pp. 99–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5509/201588199.
Halland, H. and Canuto, O. (2013) ‘Resource-Backed Investment Finance in Least Developed Countries’, Economic Premise, 123. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.395.1964&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Hobsbawm, E. (2017) Viva la revolución: A era das utopias na América Latina. 1a edição. Edited by L. Bethell. Translated by P.M. Soares. Companhia das Letras.
Hobsbawm, E.J. (2007) Era dos extremos: o breve século XX; 1914-1991. 2. ed. Translated by M. Santarrita. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
IPEA (2018) Cooperação brasileira para o desenvolvimento internacional :levantamento 2014 - 2016.
Jervis, R. (1999) ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, 24(1), pp. 42–63.
Keohane, R.O. (2005) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. With a New preface by the author edição. Princeton University Press.
Leite, A.C.C. (2018) ‘O atual momento do desenvolvimento chinês: planejamento regional, investimento e comércio internacional’, in A expansão econômica e geopolítica da China. Belo Horizonte: Editora PUC Minas, pp. 259–283.
Leite, A.C.C. and Ramos, L.G.S. de O. (2016) ‘Investimentos chineses na América do Sul: um desenho das preferências de destino e setores’, in Perspectivas Asiáticas. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Celso Furtado/Folio Digital.
Leite, I.C. (2012) ‘Cooperação Sul-Sul: Conceito, História e Marcos Interpretativos’, Obervador On-line. 03 edn, p. 41.
Leite, I.C., Pomeroy, M. and Suyama, B. (2015) ‘Brazilian South–South Development Cooperation: The Case of the Ministry of Social Development in Africa’, Journal of International Development, 27(8), pp. 1446–1461. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3191.
Liberti, S. (2018) ‘Camponeses moçambicanos derrotam o agronegócio - Le Monde Diplomatique’, Le Monde diplomatique, 4 June. Available at: https://diplomatique.org.br/camponeses-mocambicanos-derrotam-o-agronegocio/ (Accessed: 10 May 2022).
Lima, M.R.S. de et al. (eds) (2016) Cooperación Sur-Sur, política exterior y modelos de desarrollo en América Latina. Primera edición en español. Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO (Colección Grupos de Trabajo).
Lin, J.Y. and Wang, Y. (2017) Going Beyond Aid: Development Cooperation for Structural Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lo Brutto, G. and Aceves López, L. (2017) ‘Cuando el destino nos alcanza. La relación entre movimientos sociales y gobiernos latinoamericanos de izquierda’, Tla-melaua, 11(43), pp. 156–177.
Lo Brutto, G. and Minutti, E.C. (2019) ‘Las relaciones de China con América Latina frente al cambio político latinoamericano’, in La Constelación del Sur: lecturas histórico críticas de la cooperación sur-sur. Ed. Universidad de Cantabria, pp. 207–237.
Martín, R.D. et al. (2019) La Constelación del Sur: lecturas histórico críticas de la cooperación sur-sur. Ed. Universidad de Cantabria.
Mawdsley, E. (2012) From recipients to donors: emerging powers and the changing development landscape. London New York: Zed Books.
Mawdsley, E. (2018) ‘The “Southernisation” of development?: The “Southernisation” of development?’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 59(2), pp. 173–185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12192.
Mawdsley, E. (2019) ‘South–South Cooperation 3.0? Managing the consequences of success in the decade ahead’, Oxford Development Studies, 47(3), pp. 259–274. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2019.1585792.
Mello Valença, M. and Bizzo Affonso, L. (2019) ‘O Papel Da Cooperação Humanitária Na Política Externa Brasileira Como Estratégia De Soft Power (2003-2016)’, AUSTRAL: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations, 8(15). Available at: https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-6912.86303.
Mihalyi, D., Adam, A. and Hwang, J. (2020) Resource- Backed Loans: Pitfalls and Potential. Policy Paper. London: Natural Resource Governance Institute, p. 48.
Milani, C.R.S. (2017) ABC 30 anos.
Milani, C.R.S. and Carvalho, T.C.O. (2013) ‘Cooperação Sul-Sul e Política Externa: Brasil e China no continente africano’, Estudos Internacionais: revista de relações internacionais da PUC Minas, 1(1). Available at: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/estudosinternacionais/article/view/5158 (Accessed: 10 May 2022).
Nigam, S. (2015) ‘The Challenges Faced Across South-south Cooperation’, Journal of World Economic Research, 4(5), p. 27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.s.2015040501.14.
Nye Jr., J.S. and Keohane, R.O. (2011) Power & Interdependence. 4a edição. Pearson.
Piseta, I. (2019) ‘Cooperação Sul-Sul para o Desenvolvimento: independência ou complementariedade? | Politize!’, Politize! Available at: https://www.politize.com.br/cooperacao-sul-sul-para-o-desenvolvimento-independencia-ou-complementariedade/ (Accessed: 11 August 2022).
Portela, P. de A. (2021) Desafios da cooperação Sul-Sul: o processo de desindustrialização precoce do Brasil, a China como catalisador? Master’s Thesis. Federal University of Paraíba. Available at: https://repositorio.ufpb.br (Accessed: 13 May 2022).
Putnam, R.D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization, 42(3), pp. 427–460.
Rodriguez, O. (2009) O estruturalismo latino-americano. 1a edição. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Salama, P. (2012) ‘China-Brasil: industrialização e “desindustrialização precoce”’, Cadernos do Desenvolvimento, 7(10), p. 23.
Santos, A.L.N. and Milani, C.R.S. (2014) ‘Europa dos Direitos Humanos entre a Retórica do Poder e a Diplomacia da Cooperação para o Desenvolvimento’, in Desenvolvimento e Cooperação Internacional: relação de poder e política dos Estados. Salvador: EDUFBA, pp. 13–34.
Silva, P.A. de O. e and Almeida Filho, N. (2020) ‘Cooperação Internacional para o Desenvolvimento: o Caso Brasileiro’, Revista Economia Ensaios, 34(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.14393/REE-v34n2a2020-50335.
Souza, A. de M. e (ed.) (2014) Repensando a cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil: IPEA.
Suyama, B., Waisbich, L.T. and Leite, I.C. (2016) ‘Brazil as a Development Partner Under Lula and Rousseff: Shifts and Continuities’, in J. Gu, A. Shankland, and A. Chenoy (eds) The BRICS in International Development. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK (International Political Economy Series), pp. 25–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55646-2_2.
Tambourgi, P.V. (2018) ‘Ascensão e Queda do Brasil como Doador de Assistência Humanitária Internacional: Brazil’s Rise and Fall as a Donor of International Humanitarian Assistance’, Brazilian Journal of International Relations, 6(3), pp. 573–606. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36311/2237-7743.2017.v6n3.08.p573.
Vadell, J.A. (2019) ‘China in Latin America: South-South Cooperation with Chinese Characteristics’, Latin American Perspectives, 46(2), pp. 107–125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18815511.
Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46(2), pp. 391–425.
Wendt, A. (2003) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Studies in International Relations, 67).
Wise, C. (ed.) (2016) ‘After the China Boom: What Now for Latin America’s Emerging Economies’, in The Political Economy of China-Latin America Relations in the New Millennium: Brave New World. 1a edição. New York: Routledge, pp. 143–169.
Wise, C. and Chonn Ching, V. (2018) ‘Conceptualizing China–Latin America relations in the twenty-first century: the boom, the bust, and the aftermath’, The Pacific Review, 31(5), pp. 553–572. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1408675.