Proof as an explanation of dynamic geometry generated conjectures – task design in a toolbox puzzle approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v28i3-4.149266Abstract
In the frame of a design-based research project, this paper presents analysis of Danish grade 8 students working together to prove conjectures, which they formulated based on guided explorations in a dynamic geometry environment. A systematic account of the rationale and hypothesis behind the task design is described in the form of objectives, hypotheses, and choices, which are then evaluated in light of the analysis of data. The case indicates that the designed task can bridge a connection between conjecturing activities in dynamic geometry environments and deductive reasoning. The students manage to explain theoretically, what is initially empirically evident for them in their exploration in the dynamic geometry environment. The proving activity seems to make sense for the students, as a way of explaining ”why” the conjecture is true. The Theory of Semiotic Mediation frames the design of the study and the data analysis.
References
Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paolo, D. & Robutti, O. (2007). The transition to formal proof in geometry. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school (pp. 305-323). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901691_018
Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D. & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. ZDM, 34, 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655708
Balacheff, N. (2008). The role of the researcher's epistemology in mathematics education: an essay on the case of proof. ZDM, 40 (3), 501-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0103-2
Baccaglini-Frank, A. & Mariotti, M. A. (2010). Generating conjectures in dynamic geometry: the maintaining-dragging model. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15 (3), 225-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9169-3
Bakker, A. & Eerde, D. van (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Advances in mathematics education (pp. 429-466). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16
Bartolini Bussi, M. G. & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: artefacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 746-805). Lawrence Erlbaum.
BUVM (2019). Matematik fælles mål (Mathematics common aims). Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet. https://emu.dk/sites/default/files/2019-08/GSK%20-%20F%C3%A6lles%20M%C3%A5l%20-%20Matematik.pdf
Connor, J., Moss, L. & Grover, B. (2007). Student evaluation of mathematical statements using dynamic geometry software. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38 (1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390600967380
De Villiers, M. (2007). Proof in dynamic geometry: more than verification. In D. K. Pugalee, A. Rogerson & A. Schinck (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth international Conference in Mathematics Education in a Global Community (pp. 155-159). University of North Carolina.
Edwards, M. T., Harper, S. R., Cox, D. C., Quinlan, J. & Phelps, S. (2014). Cultivating deductive thinking with angle chasing. The mathematics Teacher, 107 (6), 426-431. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.6.0426
Højsted, I. H. & Mariotti, M. A. (2023). Analysing signs emerging from students' work on a designed dependency task in dynamic geometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (Advance online publication). https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2246979
Højsted, I. H. (2021) Toward marvels in dynamic geometry teaching and learning: developing guidelines for the design of didactic sequences that exploit potentials of dynamic geometry to foster students' development of mathematical reasoning competency [PhD thesis]. Aarhus University. https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.413
Højsted, I. H. (2020a) Utilizing affordances of dynamic geometry environments to support students' development of reasoning competency. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 25 (2), 71-98.
Højsted, I. H. (2020b) Teachers reporting on dynamic geometry utilization related to reasoning competency in Danish lower secondary school. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6, 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00059-3
Laborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with cabri-geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013309728825
Laborde, C. (2003) Technology used as a tool for mediating knowledge in the teaching of mathematics: the case of Cabri-geometry. In W.-C. Yang, S. C. Chu, T. de Alwis & M. G. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (pp. 23-38). Chung Hua University
Lachmy, R. & Koichu, B. (2014). The interplay of empirical and deductive reasoning in proving "if" and "only if" statements in a dynamic geometry environment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.07.002
Leung, A., Baccaglini-Frank, A. & Mariotti, M.A. (2013) Discernment of invariants in dynamic geometry environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84 (3), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9492-4
Leung, A. (2015). Discernment and reasoning in dynamic geometry environments. In S. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 451-469). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_26
Olivero, F. & Robutti, O. (2007). Measuring in dynamic geometry environments as a tool for conjecturing and proving. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12, 135-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-007-9115-1
Mariotti, M. A. & Maracci, M. (2011). Resources for the teacher from a semiotic mediation perspective. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to "lived" resources: mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 59-76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_4
Mariotti, M. A. (2012). Proof and proving in the classroom: dynamic geometry systems as tools of semiotic mediation. Research in Mathematics Education, 14 (2), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.694282
Mariotti, M. A. (2014). Transforming images in a DGS: the semiotic potential of the dragging tool for introducing the notion of conditional statement. In S. Rezat, M. Hattermann & A. Peter-Koop (Eds.) Transformation - a fundamental idea of mathematics education (pp. 155-172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3489-4_8
Marrades, R. & Gutiérrez, Á. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 87-125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012785106627
NCTM (2008). Navigating through reasoning and proof in Grades 9-12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Sinclair, N. & Robutti, O. (2013). Technology and the role of proof: the case of dynamic geometry. In M. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel-Kreidt, J. Kilpatrick & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 571-596). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_19
Trocki, A. (2014). Evaluating and writing dynamic geometry tasks. The Mathematics Teacher, 107 (9), 701-705. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.9.0701
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934)
White, R. T. & Gunstone, R. F. (2014). Probing understanding. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203761342
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
