Transition between discourses – portraying teaching practices in collegial discussions

Authors

Odd Tore Kaufmann
Andreas Ryve

Abstract

This paper investigates how teachers portray their own teaching practices while reflecting on them and discussing them in collegial discussions. Analysing data from eight groups with a total of 59 teachers, this study investigates how teachers portray their teaching practices and draw upon different discourses to represent their role as a teacher. This analysis finds that teachers describe different teaching practices in different lesson phases and draw upon different discourses in doing so. From this study emerges an eclectic, pragmatic teacher who rather comfortably navigates between different discourses to create a new, blended discourse.

References

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J. & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 (1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017

Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J. et al. (2014). Developing mathematical competence: from the intended to the enacted curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.001

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bray, W. S. (2011). A collective case study of the influence of teachers' beliefs and knowledge on error-handling practices during class discussion of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics education, 42 (1), 2-38. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.1.0002

Brodie, K. (2014). Learning about learner errors in professional learning communities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9507-1

Cobb, P. & Jackson, K. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13 (1), 6-33.

Cobb, P., Jackson, K., Henrick, E. & Smith, T. M. (2018). Systems for instructional improvement: creating coherence from the classroom to the district office. Harvard Education Press.

Cross, D. I. (2009). Alignment, cohesion, and change: examining mathematics teachers' belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12 (5), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9120-5

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38 (3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Desimone, L. M. & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers' professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 7 (3), 252-263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515

Diehl, M., Lindgren, J. & Leffler, E. (2015). The impact of classification and framing in entrepreneurial education: field observations in two lower secondary schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3 (8), 489-501. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030803

Elliott, R., Kazemi, E., Lesseig, K., Mumme, J., Carroll, C. & Kelley-Petersen, M. (2009). Conceptualizing the work of leading mathematical tasks in professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (4), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109341150

Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. The Falmer Press.

Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R. & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 403-434. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0403

Forsberg, E., Hortlund, T. & Malmberg, K. (2016). The assessment culture of school leadership. Nordic Studies in Education, 36 (02), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2016-02-05

Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E. & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Information Age.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Hemmi, K. & Ryve, A. (2015). Effective mathematics teaching in Finnish and Swedish teacher education discourses. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18 (6), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9293-4

Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Munter, C. & Greeno, J. (2018). Conflicting frames: a case of misalignment between professional development efforts and a teacher's practice in a high school mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97 (1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9777-0

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Wearne, D. et al. (1997). Making sense: teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Heinemann.

Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers' conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16 (1), 37-79. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1601_3

Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L. & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44 (4), 646-682. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0646

Kim, H. J., Metzger, M. & Heaton, R. M. (2020). Teacher planning sessions as professional opportunities to learn: an elementary mathematics teacher's re-conceptualization of instructional triangles. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18 (7), 1207-1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10019-y

Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problem of teaching. Yale University Press.

Lindvall, J., Helenius, O., Eriksson, K. & Ryve, A. (2021). Impact and design of a national-scale professional development program for mathematics teachers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1910563

Lindvall, J., Helenius, O. & Wiberg, M. (2018). Critical features of professional development programs: comparing content focus and impact of two large-scale programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.013

Lui, A. M. & Bonner, S. M. (2016). Preservice and inservice teachers' knowledge, beliefs, and instructional planning in primary school mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.015

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Munter, C. (2014). Developing visions of high-quality mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45 (5), 584-635. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.5.0584

Munter, C., Stein, M. K. & Smith, M. A. (2015). Dialogic and direct instruction: two distinct models of mathematics instruction and the debate(s) surrounding them. Teachers College Record, 117 (11), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511701102

Munter, C. & Wilhelm, A. G. (2020). Mathematics teachers' knowledge, networks, practice, and change in instructional visions. Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120949836

Pettersson, D., Prøitz, T. P. & Forsberg, E. (2017). From role models to nations in need for advice: Norway and Sweden under the OECD's magnifying glass. Journal of Education Policy, 32 (6), 721-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1301557

Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: a critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42 (2), 167-198. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.2.0167

Ryve, A. & Hemmi, K. (2019). Educational policy to improve mathematics instruction at scale: conceptualizing contextual factors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102 (3), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09887-6

Ryve, A., Hemmi, K. & Kornhall, P. (2016). Skola på vetenskaplig grund [School on a scientific basis]. Natur & Kultur.

Skolverket (2018a). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare. Skolverket.

Skolverket (2018b). Matematiklyftet [Boost for mathematics]. https://larportalen.skolverket.se/#/moduler/1-matematik/alla/alla

Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W. & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: an analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33 (2), 455-488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455

Swan, M. (2006). Designing and using research instruments to describe the beliefs and practices of mathematics teachers. Research in Education, 75(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.75.5

Valoyes-Chávez, L. (2019). On the making of a new mathematics teacher: professional development, subjectivation, and resistance to change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100 (2), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9869-5

Wiliam, D. (1997). Relevance as MacGuffin in mathematics education. British Educational Research Conference, York, September 1997. https://mrbartonmaths.com/resourcesnew/8.%20Research/Real%20Life/Relevance%20as%20MacGuffin%20(BERA%2097).pdf

Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90 (3), 238-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636506291521

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Kaufmann, O. T., & Ryve, A. (2022). Transition between discourses – portraying teaching practices in collegial discussions. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 25–46. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/NOMAD/article/view/149242