Preservice and inservice teachers’ views on digital tools for diverse learners in mathematics education

Authors

  • Tamsin Meaney
  • Hilja L. Huru
  • Mona Kvivesen

Abstract

Although teachers are expected to use digital tools in their mathematics teaching in many countries, little is known about preservice and inservice teachers’ digital competence, especially in relationship to specific groups of school students. Results from a survey of 394 preservice teachers and 61 inservice teachers, at three Norwegian institutions, provide information on how they considered different digital tools would support differentiated teaching, related to a student’s mathematical progress, and in multilingual classes. The results suggest that preservice and inservice teachers evaluated similarly the usefulness of different digital tools for differentiated mathematics teaching and in multilingual classrooms. However, for the majority of tools, the standard deviations indicate that the responses were somewhat spread, suggesting uncertainty in how they could use digital tools to support specific groups of students.

References

Allen, P. & Trinick, T. (2021). Agency-structure dynamics in an indigenous mathematics education community in times of an existential crisis in education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108 (1), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10098-1

Attard, C. & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34, 719-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2

Braathe, H. J. & Ongstad, S. (2001). Egalitarianism meets ideologies of mathematical education-instances from Norwegian curricula and classrooms. ZDM, 33 (5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656615

Calder, N. (2015). Apps: appropriate, applicable, and appealing? In T. Lowrie & R. Jorgensen (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning (pp. 233-250). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9517-3_12

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Fauskanger, J., Mosvold, R., Valenta, A. & Bjuland, R. (2018). Good mathematics teaching as constructed in Norwegian teachers' discourses. In E. Norén, H. Palmér & A. Cooke (Eds.) Nordic Research in Mathematics Education, (pp. 239-248). Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education.

Forsström, S. E. & Kaufmann, O. T. (2018). A literature review exploring the use of programming in mathematics education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17 (12), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.12.2

Ganesh, T. G. & Middleton, J. A. (2006). Challenges in linguistically and culturally diverse elementary settings with math instruction using learning technologies. The Urban Review, 38 (2), 101-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-006-0025-7

Grugeon, B., Lagrange, J. B., Jarvis, D., Alagic, M., Das, M. & Hunscheidt, D. (2009). Teacher education courses in mathematics and technology: analyzing views and options. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: rethinking the terrain (pp. 329-345). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_15

Guđmundsdóttir, G. B. & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers' professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085

Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M., Petocz, P. & Kelly, N. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13 (1), 22-40.

Karatas, I., Tunc, M. P., Yilmaz, N. & Karaci, G. (2017). An investigation of technological pedagogical content knowledge, self-confidence, and perception of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers towards instructional technologies. Educational Technology & Society, 20 (3), 122-132.

Kim, S. (2018). ICT for children of immigrants: indirect and total effects via self-efficacy on math performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(8), 1168-1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117699954

Kitchen, R. & Berk, S. (2016). Educational technology: an equity challenge to the Common Core. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47 (1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.1.0003

Kunnskapsdepartementet (2006). Curriculum regulations in mathematics (Læreplan i matematikk fellesfag MAT1-04). Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/finn-lareplan/lareplan/?kode=MAT1-04

Kunnskapsdepartementet (2019). Læreplan i matematikk (Mat01-05). Fastsatt som forskrift. Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet 2020. (Curriculum for mathematics year 1-10 (MAT01-05)). Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.udir.no/lk20/mat01-05?lang=eng

Lange, T. & Meaney, T. (2011). Preservice teachers learning mathematics from the internet. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer & S. Thornton (Eds), Mathematics: traditions and [new] practices (Proceedings of MERGA 34) (pp. 438-445). AAMT/MERGA.

Libbrecht, P. & Goosen, L. (2016). Using ICTs to facilitate multilingual mathematics teaching and learning. In R. Barwell, P. Clarkson, A. Halai, M. Kazima, J. Moschkovich et al. (Eds.) Mathematics education and language diversity (pp. 217-235). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14511-2_12

McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T. & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers' integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers & Education, 123, 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008

Madsen, S. S., Thorvaldsen, S. & Archard, S. (2018). Teacher educators' perceptions of working with digital technologies. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13 (3), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-03-04

Meaney, T. (2018). Mathematics curricula: issues of access and quality. In M. Jurdak & R. Vithal (Eds.) Social and political dimensions of mathematics education (pp. 171-189). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72610-6_10

Meaney, T. & Rangnes, T. E. (2022). Using digital tools in language diverse mathematics classrooms. In J. Hodgen, E. Geraniou, G. Bolondi & F. Ferretti (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 12. ERME. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03746075/

Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Niess, M. L. (2006). Guest editorial: preparing teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6 (2), 195-203

Orlando, J. & Attard, C. (2016). Digital natives come of age: the reality of today's early career teachers using mobile devices to teach mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28 (1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0159-6

Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K. & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: foundations for change. ZDM, 49 (5), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0879-z

Player-Koro, C. (2013). Hype, hope and ICT in teacher education: a Bernsteinian perspective. Learning, Media and Technology, 38 (1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.637503

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42 (2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Søby, M. (2013). Horizon: technology outlook for Norwegian schools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8 (04), 187-190. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2013-04-01

Teo, T. & Milutinovic, V. (2015). Modelling the intention to use technology for teaching mathematics among pre-service teachers in Serbia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31 (4), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1668

Viberg, O., Grönlund, Å. & Andersson, A. (2020). Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: a Swedish case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1770801

Vinje, I. S.-Å. (2020, January 17). Å forby mobilbruk i skolen er lettvint og utdatert. Aftenposten. https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kronikk/i/qLrGvw/aa-forby-mobilbruk-i-skolen-er-lettvint-og-utdatert-ingrid-somdal-aamo

Warschauer, M. & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34 (1), 179-225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791

Zambak, V. S. & Tyminski, A. M. (2020). Examining mathematical technological knowledge of pre-service middle grades teachers with Geometer's Sketchpad in a geometry course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51 (2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1650302

Zelkowski, J., Gleason, J., Cox, D. C. & Bismarck, S. (2013). Developing and validating a reliable TPACK instrument for secondary mathematics preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46 (2), 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782618

Zevenbergen, R. & Lerman, S. (2008). Learning environments using interactive whiteboards: new learning spaces or reproduction of old technologies? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20 (1), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217471

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Meaney, T., Huru, H. L., & Kvivesen, M. (2023). Preservice and inservice teachers’ views on digital tools for diverse learners in mathematics education. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 28(3-4), 103–123. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/NOMAD/article/view/149192

Issue

Section

Articles