Teachers’ support for children’s mathematical learning through interactions while playing with a coding toy

Authors

  • Francesca Granone
  • Elin Reikerås

Abstract

This study examines how early childhood education and care teachers can support children’s mathematical learning in the context of playing with a coding toy (a robot). Video recordings of the interactions that occurred between a teacher and four 3- to 5-year-old pupils while they played with a robot (three hours per week over the course of a month) were analysed based on the theoretical framework of semiotic mediation for mathematics education. The results highlight the fact that the coding toy can be viewed as an artefact for accomplishing a didactic mathematical objective through teacher support, including factors such as problem-solving, counting and measuring.

References

Alimisis, D. (2012). Robotics in education & education in robotics: shifting focus from technology to pedagogy. In D. Obdrzálek (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on robotics in education (pp. 7-14). Charles University in Prague.

Arzarello, F. & Bussi, M. G. B. (1998). Italian trends in research in mathematical education: a national case study from an international perspective. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: a search for identity (pp. 243-262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5196-2_1

Bartolini Bussi, M. (2008). Matematica: i numeri e lo spazio [Mathematics: Numbers and space]. Junior.

Bussi, M. B. & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education, (pp. 746-783). Routledge

Bertel, L. B., Brooks, E. & Dau, S. (2019). Robot-supported inclusion and learning: a case study on the KUBO robot in early childhood education. Technology and Disability, 31 (1), 22-23.

Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational studies in mathematics, 19 (2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751231

Campbell, T. & Hlusek, M. (2015). Storytelling for fluency and flair: a performance-based approach. The Reading Teacher, 69 (2), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1384

Çiftci, S. & Bildiren, A. (2020). The effect of coding courses on the cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills of preschool children. Computer Science Education, 30 (1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1696169

Clarke-Midura, J., Kozlowski, J. S., Shumway, J. F. & Lee, V. R. (2021). How young children engage in and shift between reference frames when playing with coding toys. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 28, 100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100250

Davis, E. A. & Miyake, N. (2018). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. Journal of the learning sciences, 13, 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_1

Edwards, S., Mantilla, A., Grieshaber, S., Nuttall, J. & Wood, E. (2020). Converged play characteristics for early childhood education: multi-modal, global-local, and traditional-digital. Oxford Review of Education, 46 (5), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1750358

Ellis, P. & Abbott, J. (2019). Learning from mistakes I: why it is important. Journal of Kidney Care, 4 (4), 225-227. https://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2019.4.4.225

Fine, G. A. & Sandstrom, K. L. (1988). Knowing children: participant observation with minors. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984706

Fleer, M. (2019). Digitally amplified practices: beyond binaries and towards a profile of multiple digital coadjuvants. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26 (3), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1646289

Fleer, M. (2014). Theorising play in the early years. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282131

Granone, F. & Reikerås, E. K. L. (2021). Preschoolers learning by playing with technology. In O. M. Alegre de la Rosa, L. M. Angulo & A. Giambrone (Eds.) Education in Childhood (pp. 121-133). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97791

Greig, A. D., Taylor, M. J. & MacKay, T. (2007). Doing research with children. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209045

Helenius, O., Johansson, M. L., Lange, T., Meaney, T., Riesbeck, E. & Wernberg, A. (2016). When is young children's play mathematical? In T. Meaney, O. Helenius, M. Johansson, T. Lange & A. Wernberg (Eds.), Mathematics education in the early years (pp. 139-156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23935-4_8

Isbell, R., Sobol, J., Lindauer, L. & Lowrance, A. (2004). The effects of storytelling and story reading on the oral language complexity and story comprehension of young children. Early childhood education journal, 32 (3), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECEJ.0000048967.94189.a3

Jefferson G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner G. H. (Eds.), Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In S. Price, C. Jewitt & B. Brown (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital technology research (pp. 250-265). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282229.n18

Kewalramani, S., Palaiologou, I., Arnott, L. & Dardanou, M. (2020). The integration of the internet of toys in early childhood education: a platform for multi-layered interactions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28 (2), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1735738

Kunnskapsdepartementet (2017). Rammeplan for barnehagen: forskrift om rammeplan for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver. Udir.

Ladel, S. & Kortenkamp, U. (2013). An activity-theoretic approach to multi-touch tools in early maths learning. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 20 (1), 3-8.

Larkin, K., Kortenkamp, U., Ladel, S. & Etzold, H. (2019). Using the ACAT framework to evaluate the design of two geometry apps: an exploratory study. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 5 (1), 59-92 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-018-0045-4

Lipkin, S. (1990). Technology as ontology: a phenomenological approach to video image resolution. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 12 (3), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509209009361355

Mercer, N., Hennessy, S. & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007

Merjovaara, O., Nousiainen, T., Turja, L. & Isotalo, S. (2020). Digital stories with children: examining digital storytelling as a pedagogical process in ECEC. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 9, 1-26.

Mondada, L. (2008, September). Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9 (3).

Mowafi, Y., Abumuhfouz, I. & Redifer, J. (2019). A play-based interactive learning approach for fostering counting and numbers learning skills for early childhood education using QR codes mobile technologies. In I. Awan, M. Younas, P. Unal & M. Aleksy (Eds.), Mobile web and intelligent information systems (pp. 16-26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27192-3_2

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and teacher education, 21 (5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006

Niess, M. L. (2006). Guest editorial: preparing teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 6 (2), 195-203.

Norris, S. (2009). Modal density and modal configurations: multimodal actions. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 78-90). Routledge.

Palmér, H. (2017). Programming in preschool - with a focus on learning mathematics. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 8 (1), 75-87.

Pellegrini, A. D., Dupuis, D. & Smith, P. K. (2007). Play in evolution and development. Developmental Review, 27 (2), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.09.001

Pentimonti, J. M. & Justice, L. M. (2010). Teachers' use of scaffolding strategies during read alouds in the preschool classroom. Early childhood education journal, 37 (4), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0348-6

Phillips, L. (2000). Storytelling: the seeds of children's creativity. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 25 (3), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910002500302

Plowman, L., Stephen, C. & McPake, J. (2010). Supporting young children's learning with technology at home and in preschool. Research Papers in Education, 25 (1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802584061

Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.

Pramling, N., Wallerstedt, C., Lagerlöf, P., Björklund, C., Kultti, A. et al. (2019). Play-responsive teaching in early childhood education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15958-0

Pramling Samuelsson, I. & Johansson, E. (2006). Play and learning - inseparable dimensions in preschool practice. Early Child Development and Care, 176 (1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000302654

Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E. et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The journal of the learning sciences, 13 (3), 337-386. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4

Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning sciences, 13 (3), 273-304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2

Reikerås, E. K. L. (2020). Relations between play skills and mathematical skills in toddlers. ZDM, 52(4), 703-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01141-1

Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Early, D. M., Cox, M. J., Saluja, G., Pianta, R. C. et al. (2002). Early behavioral attributes and teachers' sensitivity as predictors of competent behavior in the kindergarten classroom. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23 (4), 451-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(02)00128-4

Samuelsson, I. P. & Carlsson, M. A. (2008). The playing learning child: towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52 (6), 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802497265

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). Mathematical problem-solving. Elsevier.

Selby, C. & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational thinking: the developing definition. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference on innovation and technology in computer science education, Canterbury.

Shumway, J. F., Welch, L. E., Kozlowski, J. S., Clarke-Midura, J. & Lee, V. R. (2021). Kindergarten students' mathematics knowledge at work: the mathematics for programming robot toys. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1982666

Singer D. G., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (Eds.) (2006). Play= Learning: how play motivates and enhances children's cognitive and social-emotional growth. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304381.001.0001

Solem, I. H. & Reikerås, E. (2001). Det matematiske barnet [The mathematical child] (1. ed.). Caspar.

Solem, I. H. & Reikerås, E. (2017). Det matematiske barnet [The mathematical child] (3. ed.). Caspar.

Sutton-Smith, B. (2009). The ambiguity of play. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044180

Trouche, L. (2005). Construction et conduite des instruments dans des apprentissages mathématiques: nécessité des orchestrations. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 25 (1), 91-138.

Turan, S. & Aydogdu, F. (2020). Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children's skills of scientific process. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4353-4363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10178-4

Undheim, M. (2021). Children and teachers engaging together with digital technology in early childhood education and care institutions: a literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30 (3), 472-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1971730

Ventola, E., Charles, C. & Kaltenbacher, M. (Eds.) (2004). Perspectives on multimodality. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.6

Vogt, F., Hauser, B., Stebler, R., Rechsteiner, K. & Urech, C. (2018). Learning through play - pedagogy and learning outcomes in early childhood mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26 (4), 589-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1487160

Wang, X. C., Choi, Y., Benson, K., Eggleston, C. & Weber, D. (2021). Teacher's role in fostering preschoolers' computational thinking: an exploratory case study. Early Education and Development, 32 (1), 26-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1759012

Welch, L. E., Shumway, J. F., Clarke-Midura, J. & Lee, V. R. (2022). Exploring measurement through coding: children's conceptions of a dynamic linear unit with robot coding toys. Education Sciences, 12 (2), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020143

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49 (3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Yeo, S. (2021). Semiotic mediation through technology: the case of fraction reasoning. The Mathematical Education, 60 (1), 1-19.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Granone, F., & Reikerås, E. (2023). Teachers’ support for children’s mathematical learning through interactions while playing with a coding toy. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 28(3-4), 55–76. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/NOMAD/article/view/149071

Issue

Section

Articles