Finnish entry-level students’ views of teacher knowledge and the characteristics of a good mathematics teacher

Authors

Mervi A. Asikainen
Antti Viholainen
Mika Koponen
Pekka E. Hirvonen

Abstract

This paper reports a study of the views held by Finnish students at the start of their university studies concerning their understanding of the knowledge and characteristics of a good mathematics teacher. A total of 97 students following a basic university course responded to a questionnaire. The results showed that a knowledge of teaching mathematics was more often used to describe the good mathematics teacher than a knowledge of mathematics. According to the students’ views, mathematics teachers need to be able to take the level of understanding of individual students into account in their teaching. Good mathematics teachers were also considered to be skilled in explaining, simplifying and transforming mathematical contents for their students. A good mathematics teacher was often described by the respondents as a patient, clear, inspiring and consistent person. On the other hand, characteristics such as humorous, likeable, empathetic, or fair were seldom used in the students’ responses to describe a good mathematics teacher. Those respondents who planned to become teachers demonstrated a more learner-centred concept of a good mathematics teacher than did those who were aiming at some other subject specialist profession than that of teaching.

References

Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17 (2), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840649401700203

Arnon, S. & Reichel, N. (2007). Who is the ideal teacher? Am I? Similarity and difference in perception of students of education regarding the qualities of a good teacher and of their own qualities as teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 13 (5), 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701561653

Asikainen, M. A., Pehkonen, E. & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Finnish mathematics teachers views of the teacher knowledge required for teaching mathematics. Higher Education Studies, 3 (1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v3n1p79

Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C. & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29 (1), 14-46.

Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T. & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: the unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 433-456). New York: Macmillan.

Beishuizen, J. J., Hof, E., Putten, C. M. van, Bouwmeester, S. & Asscher, J. J. (2001). Students' and teachers' cognitions about good teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71 (2), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158451

Boz, N. & Boz, Y. (2008). A qualitative case study of prospective chemistry teachers' knowledge about instructional strategies: introducing particulate theory. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19 (2), 135-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9087-y

Check, J. F. (1986). Positive traits of the effective teacher - negative traits of the ineffective one. Education, 106 (3), 326-334.

Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F. & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26 (6), 673-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.002

Cobb, P. & Steffe, L. P. (2010). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. In E. Yackel, K. Gravemeije. & A. Sfard (Rds.), A journey in mathematics education research (pp. 19-30). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9729-3_3

Cobb, P., Yackel, E. & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23 (1), 2-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/749161

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563

Cruickshank, D. R. & Haefele, D. (2001). Good teachers, plural. Educational Leadership, 58 (5), 26-30.

Friedman, I. A. (2000). Burnout in teachers: shattered dreams of impeccable professional performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56 (5), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200005)56:5<595::AID-JCLP2>3.0.CO;2-Q

Goulding, M., Rowland, T. & Barber, P. (2002). Does it matter? Primary teacher trainees' subject knowledge in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 28 (5), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000015543a

Graham, G. & Heimerer, E. (1981). Research on teacher effectiveness: a summary with implications for teaching. Quest, 33 (1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1981.10483718

Hill, H. & Ball, D. L. (2009). The curious - and crucial - case of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 91 (2), 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100215

Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T. & Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment [MET Project Research Paper]. Retrieved from http:// k12education.gatesfoundation.org/resource/have-we-identified-effective- teachers-validating-measures-of-effective-teaching-using-random-assignment/

Kaur, B. (2004). Towards excellence in the mathematics classroom - a look at the teacher. In B. Tadich, P. Sullivan, S. Tobias & C. Brew (Eds.), Towards excellence in the mathematics classroom (pp. 237-246). Australia: The Mathematical Association of Victoria.

Kunter, M., Tsai, Y. M., Klusmann, U., Brunner, M., Krauss, S. & Baumert, J. (2008). Students' and mathematics teachers' perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 18 (5), 468-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.008

Leinhardt, G. & Smith, D. A. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77 (3), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.247

Lerkkanen, M. K., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A. M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Siekkinen, M. & Nurmi, J. E. (2016). Child-centered versus teacher-directed teaching practices: associations with the development of academic skills in the first grade at school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.023

Löfström, E., Poom‐Valickis, K., Hannula, M. S. & Mathews, S. R. (2010). Supporting emerging teacher identities: Can we identify teacher potential among students? European Journal of Teacher Education, 33 (2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619761003631831

Ma, X. & Xu, J. (2004). Determining the causal ordering between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. American Journal of Education, 110 (3), 256-280. https://doi.org/10.1086/383074

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/ fqs/article/view/1089/2385

Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E. & James, T. L. (2002). Preservice teachers' educational beliefs and their perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96 (2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209598798

Murphy, P. K., Delli, K. A. & Edwards, M. N. (2004). The good teacher and good teaching: comparing beliefs of second-grade students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72 (2), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.72.2.69-92

Murray, H. G. (1975). Predicting student ratings of college teaching from peer ratings of personality types. Teaching of Psychology, 2 (2), 66-69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top0202_4

Murray, H. G., Rushton, J. P. & Paunonen, S. V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (2), 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.250

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Schuh, K. L. (2004). Learner-centered principles in teacher-centered practices? Teaching and Teacher Education, 20 (8), 833-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.008

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41 (4), 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317810

Singh, K., Granville, M. & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95 (6), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607

Steele, M. D. (2005). Comparing knowledge bases and reasoning structures in discussions of mathematics and pedagogy. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8 (4), 291-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-0854-4

Viholainen, A., Asikainen, M. A. & Hirvonen, P. E. (2014). Mathematics student teachers' epistemological beliefs about the nature of mathematics and the goals of mathematics teaching and learning in the beginning of their studies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10 (2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1028a

Välijärvi, J., Kupari, P., Linnakylä, P., Reinikainen, P., Sulkunen, S. et al. (2007). The Finnish success in Pisa - and some reasons behind it: 2 Pisa 2003. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos.

Westbury, I., Hansén, S. E., Kansanen, P. & Björkvist, O. (2005). Teacher education for research-based practice in expanded roles: Finland's experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49 (5), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500267937

Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J. & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: an introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63 (2), 113- 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9028-2

Downloads

Published

2024-11-19

How to Cite

Asikainen, M. A., Viholainen, A., Koponen, M., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2024). Finnish entry-level students’ views of teacher knowledge and the characteristics of a good mathematics teacher. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 22(4), 61–83. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/NOMAD/article/view/148919