”I need advanced mathematics to pursue the career of my choice” – Norwegian students’ motivations for enrolling in mathematics and plans for post-secondary studies

Authors

  • Ida Friestad Pedersen

Abstract

Participation in advanced science and mathematics courses in upper secondary school is a gateway to tertiary education and career opportunities in the STEM fields (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). The purpose of this study is to investigate Norwegian final-year upper secondary school students’ motivations for choosing to enroll in the most advanced mathematics course offered (3MX), as well as to ascertain their plans for post-secondary education. Since females are underrepresented in mathematics and mathematics-related fields of study, special attention is paid to the gender perspective. The analyses are based on questionnaire data from the large-scale international achievement study TIMSS Advanced, and are framed by the expectancy-value model developed by Eccles and her colleagues (1985). Results show that the subject’s utility value was the primary reason for students’ enrollment in mathematics; that interest in mathematics as a school subject is somewhat more important to the girls than to the boys; and that there are some gender differences in students’ plans for post-secondary studies in the STEM fields.

References

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V. & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273

Bjørnstad, R., Fredriksen, D., Gjelsvik, M. L. & Stølen, N. M. (2008). Tilbud og etterspørsel etter arbeidskraft etter utdanning, 1986-2025. Statistisk Sentralbyrå Rapporter, 2008, 29.

Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17 (4), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072

Bøe, M. V. (2012). Science choices in Norwegian upper secondary school: What matters? Science Education, 96 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20461

Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T. & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: young people's achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47 (1), 37-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549621

Charles, M. & Bradley, K. (2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review, 67 (4), 573-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240206700405

Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10 (7).Retrieved April 17, 2013 from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf

Crombie, G., Sinclair, N., Silverthorn, N., Byrne, B. M., DuBois, D. L. & Trinneer, A. (2005). Predictors of young adolescents' math grades and course enrollment intentions: gender similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 52 (5), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-2678-1

Darnall, B. D. & Suarez, E. C. (2009). Sex and gender in psychoneuro- immunology research: past, present and future. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 23 (5), 595-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2009.02.019

Davier, M. von, Gonzalez, E. & Mislevy, R. (2009). Plausible values: What are they and why do we need them? IERI Monograph Series: Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments, 2, 9-36.

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Dobson, I. R. (2007). Sustaining science: university science in the twenty-first century (A study commissioned by the Australian Council of Deans of Science). Fairfield: Centre for Population and Urban Research and the Educational Policy Institute.

Eccles, J. S. (1985). A model of student enrolment decisions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 311-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00776739

Eccles, J. S. (1989). Bringing young women to math and science. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought. New York: Springer- Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3588-0_3

Eccles, J.S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x

Eccles, J. S. (2005). Studying gender and ethnic differences in participation in math, physical science, and information technology. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.146

Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199-210). Washington: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-016

Eccles (Parsons), J. S, Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, et al. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (3), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003

Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

EU (2009). She figures 2009: statistics and indicators on gender equity in science. Brussels: European Commission.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4 (3), 272-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272

Feather, N. T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-valence framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.381

Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R. & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 507-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x

Ginsburg-Block, M. D. & Fantuzzo, J. W. (1998). An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (3), 560-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.560

Grønmo, L. S. & Onstad, T. (2009). Tegn til bedring. Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk og naturfag i TIMSS 2007. Oslo: Unipub.

Hackett, G. (1985).The role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: a path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.32.1.47

Hackett, G. & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self- efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/749515

Hannula, M. S., Maijala, H., Pehkonen, E. & Nurmi, A. (2005). Gender comparisons of pupils' self-confidence in mathematics learning. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 10 (3-4), 29-42.

Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X

Jacobs, J. E. (1991). Influence of gender stereotypes on parent and child mathematics attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 518-527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.518

Jacobs, J. E. & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and children's ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932-944. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.932

Jensen, F. & Sjaastad, J. (2013). A Norwegian out-of-school mathematics project's influence on secondary students' STEM motivation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Retrieved April 17, 2013 from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10763-013-9401-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9401-4

KD (2010). Science for the future. Strategy for strengthening mathematics, science and technology (MST) 2010-2014. Retrieved August 8, 2012 from http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/kd/documents/reports-and-actionplans/Actionplans/2010/science-for-the-future.html?id=593791

Kjærnsli, M., Lie, S., Olsen, R. V., Roe, A. & Turmo, A. (2004). Rett spor eller ville veier? Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk, naturfag og lesing i PISA 2003. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Ma, X. (2001). Participation in advanced mathematics: Do expectation and influence of students, peers, teachers, and parents matter? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1050

Markus, H. & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: a social psychological perspective. Annual Reviews Psychology, 38, 299-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503

Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O. & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: reciprocal effect models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x

Middleton J. A. & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/749630

Nagy G., Trautwein U., Baumert J., Köller O. & Garrett J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: effects of academic self- concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765687

NIFU STEP (2008). Kvinner i forskning. Retrieved July 5, 2012 from http://www. nifu.no/Norway/Documents/STATISTIKK/FoU-STATISTIKK/Kvinner %20i%20forskning/Kvinner_i_forskning_-_nov_2008.pdf

OECD (2013). Context questionnaires framework, in OECD, PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-8-en

Olsen, R. V. (2007). Large-scale international comparative achievement studies in education: their primary purposes and beyond. In S. T. Hopman, G. Brinek & M. Retzl (Eds.), PISA zufolge PISA [PISA according to PISA] (pp. 265-293). Wien: LIT Verlag.

Pajares, F. & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (2), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193

Perez-Felkner, L., McDonald, S.-K., Schneider, B. & Grogan, E. (2012). Female and male adolescents' subjective orientations to mathematics and the influence of those orientations on postsecondary majors. Developmental Psychology, 48 (6), 1658-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027020

Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002) Motivation in education: theory, research, and application (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Ramberg, I. (2006). Realfag eller ikke? Elevers motivasjon for valg og bortvalg av realfag i videregående opplæring. Oslo: NIFU STEP.

Rønning, M. (2010). Homework and pupil achievement in Norway. Evidence from TIMSS (Reports 1/2010. Oslo-Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.

Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8 (4), 350-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350

Schreiner, C., Henriksen, E.K., Sjaastad, J., Jensen, F. & Løken, M. (2010). Vilje-convalg: valg og bortvalg av realfag . KIMEN, 2010 (2). (Contains English summary). The Norwegian Centre for Science Education. Retrieved April 17, 2013 from http://www.naturfagsenteret.no/binfil/download2.php?tid=1509698

Simpkins, S. D. & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The intersection between self- concepts and values: links between beliefs and choices in high school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.148

Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E. & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: a longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42 (1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70

Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of inspiration: the role of significant persons in young people's choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (10), 1615-1636. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.590543

Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K. & Cripps Clark, J. (2008). Opening up pathways: engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Retrieved August 10, 2012 from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/career_development/publications_resources/profiles/Opening_Up_Pathways.htm#authors

UNESCO (2012). World atlas of gender equality in education. Paris: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Updegraff, K. A., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L. & O'Brien, K. M. (1996). Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90016-3

Wang, M. T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: a longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48 (6), 1643-1657. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027247

Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation: an International Journal on Theory and Practice, 12 (4), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765562

Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S. & Durik, A. M. (2006). The leaky mathematics pipeline for girls: a motivational analysis of high school enrolments in Australia and the USA. Equal Opportunities International, 25 (8), 642-659. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150610719119

Watt, H. M., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P. & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: a comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48 (6), 1594-1611. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027838

Wedege, T. (2007). Gender perspectives in mathematics education: intentions of research in Denmark and Norway. ZDM, 39 (3), 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0026-3

Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation. metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park: Sage.

Wigfield, A., Battle, A., Keller, L. B. & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Sex differences in motivation, self-concept, career aspiration, and career choice: implications for cognitive development. In A. McGillicuddy-De Lisi & R. De Lisi (Eds.), Biology, society, and behavior: the development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 93-124), Westport: Ablex.

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., et al. (1997). Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: a 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (3), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451

Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. E., Roeser, R. & Schiefele, U. (2008). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: an advanced course. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0315

Wolters, C. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003035929216

Downloads

Published

2024-11-19

How to Cite

Pedersen, I. F. (2024). ”I need advanced mathematics to pursue the career of my choice” – Norwegian students’ motivations for enrolling in mathematics and plans for post-secondary studies. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 61–83. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/NOMAD/article/view/148498

Issue

Section

Articles