Using strands of tasks to promote growth of students’ mathematical understanding

Authors

  • John Francisco
  • Gunnar Gjone

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v17i1.148414

Abstract

This article reports on the mathematical activity of a group of five high school students (15–16 year olds) who worked together on a series of challenging task in combinatorics and probability. The students were participants in an after-school, classroom-based, longitudinal research on students’ development of mathematical ideas and different forms of reasoning in several mathematical content strands. The purpose of the article is to contribute insights into how to promote growth of students’ mathematical understanding through problem-solving activities. In particular, the article shows that problem-solving activities involving strands of challenging tasks have the potential to promote growth of students’ mathematical understanding by providing opportunities for students to engage in reasoning by isomorphism. This is a type of reasoning whereby students rely on structural similarities, i.e., isomorphism among mathematical tasks to solve or deepen their understanding of the tasks. Implications for classroom teaching, and environmental conditions that promote reasoning by isomorphism are also discussed.

References

Barbeau, E. & Taylor, P. (2005). ICMI Study 16: challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom: discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60 (1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-8481-7

Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: the integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 1-33). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cai, J. (2003). What research tells us about teaching mathematics through problem solving. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Research and issues in teaching mathematics through problem solving (pp. 241-254). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Cai, J. (2010). Why is teaching with problem solving important for student learning? Retrieved September 19, 2011 from http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Research_News_and_Advocacy/Research/Clips_and_Briefs/ Research_brief_14_-_Problem_Solving.pdf#search=%22Jinfa Cai%22.

Cai, J., Mamona-Downs, J. & Weber, K. (2005). Mathematical problem solving: what we know and where we are going. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24 (3-4), 217-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.014

Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Jacobs, V. R., Fennema, E. & Empson, S. B. (1998). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/749715

Cobb, P. & Yackel, E. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 158-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720406.007

Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G. et al. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, p. 3-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/749551

De Corte, E., Greer, B. & Verschaffel, L. (1996). Mathematics teaching and learning. In D. C. Berlin and R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan.

Dörfler, W. (2000). Means for meaning. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classroom: perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 99-131). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Francisco, J.M. & Maher, C.A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24 (3/4), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.001

Francisco, J. M. & Maher, C. A. (2011). Teachers attending to students' mathematical reasoning: lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 14 (1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9144-x

Hanna, G. (1995). Challenges to the importance of proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15 (3), 42-49.

Hiebert, J. & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional task, classroom discourse, and students' learning in second grade. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 393-425. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030002393

Lambdin, D. V. (2003). Benefits of teaching through problem solving. In F. K. Lester & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: prekindergarten-grade 6 (pp. 3-13). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Lappan, G. & Phillips, E. (1998). Teaching and learning in the Connected Mathematics. In L. Leutzinger (Ed.), Mathematics in the middle (pp. 83-92). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Lester, F. K. & Charles, R. I. (Eds.). (2003). Teaching mathematics through problem solving: prekindergarten-grade 6. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Lobato, J. & Siebert, D. (2002). Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 87-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00105-0

Maher, C. A. (2004). The development of mathematical reasoning: a sixteen-year study. Paper presented at the Tenth International Congress on Mathematics Education (Regular Lecture), Copenhagen, Denmark.

Maher, C. A. (2005). How students structure their investigations and learn mathematics: insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.12.006

Maher, C. A. & Martino, A. M. (1996). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: a 5-year case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27 (2), 194-214. https://doi.org/10.2307/749600

Marcus, R. & Fey, J. T. (2003). Selecting quality tasks for problem-based teaching. In H. L. Schoen & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: grades 6-12 (pp. 55-67). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

McLeod, D. B., Craviotto, C. & Ortega, M. (1990). Students' affective responses to non-routine mathematical problems: an empirical study. In G. Booker, P. Cobb & T.N. de Mendicuti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 159-166). Oaxtepec: Program Committee.

NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Novick, L.R. & Holyoak, K.J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398-415. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.17.3.398

Nunokawa, K. (2005). Mathematical problem solving and learning mathematics: what we expect students to obtain. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.002

Nunokawa, K. & Fukuzawa, T. (2002). Questions during problem solving with dynamic geometric software and understanding problem situations. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part D: Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12 (1), 31-43.

Powell, A.B. (2003). "So let's prove it": emergent and elaborated mathematical ideas and reasoning in the discourse and description of learners engaged in a combinatorial task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Rutgers University.

Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M. & Maher, C. A. (2003). An evolving analytical model for understanding the development of mathematical thinking using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22 (4), 405-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002

Reed, S.K. (1999). Word problems: research and curricula reform. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schoen, H. L. & Charles, R. I. (Eds.). (2003). Teaching mathematics through problem solving: grades 6-12. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.

Schroeder, T. L. & Lester, F. K., Jr. (1989). Developing understanding in mathematics via problem solving. In P. R. Trafton (Ed.), New directions for elementary school mathematics, 1989 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 31-42). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205

Uptegrove, E. (2005). To symbols from meaning: students' investigations in counting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Rutgers University.

Van de Walle, J. A. (2003). Designing and selecting problem-based tasks. In F. K. Lester, Jr. & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: prekindergarten-grade 6 (pp. 67-80). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Verschaffel, L. & De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching realistic mathematical modeling in the elementary school: a teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28 (5), 577-601. https://doi.org/10.2307/749692

Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: the need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48 (1), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015535614355

Weber, K. (2005). Problem-solving processes, proving, and learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24 (3/4), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.005

Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A. & Lee, H. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions: warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68 (32), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8

Weber, K., Powell, A. B. & Maher, C. A. (2006). Strands of challenging mathematical problems and the construction of mathematical problem- solving schema. Retrieved September 19, 2011 from http://www.amt.edu.au/ icmis16pusapowell.pdf.

Yackel, E. & Rasmussen, C. (2003). Beliefs and norms in the mathematics classroom. In G.C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (p. 313-330). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_18

Downloads

Published

2012-03-19

How to Cite

Francisco, J., & Gjone, G. (2012). Using strands of tasks to promote growth of students’ mathematical understanding. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v17i1.148414

Issue

Section

Articles