Connecting theories in mathematics education: from bricolage to professionalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v15i1.148237Abstract
Connecting theories is a normal activity in the practice of mathematics education researchers and the theories come from within the field of mathematics education (”home-brewed” theories) or from outside (psychological, sociological, anthropological; philosophical, linguistic etc. theories). Thus, the researcher needs methods and strategies for connecting theories; e.g. comparing/contrasting and integrating/ synthesizing. I argue that a meta-language is also needed in order to move from bricolage to professionalism in the work of theory connection. Drawing on Radford’s morphology of theories as triplets of principles, methodologies and research questions, I suggest a set of quality criteria for research papers and reports which focuses on the explicitness in reporting theory connection.
References
Alrø, H., Skovsmose, O. & Valero, P. (2009). Researching multicultural classroom through the lens of landscapes of learning. In C. Winsløw (Ed.), Nordic research in mathematics education. Proceedings from NORMA08 in Copenhagen, April 21-25, 2008 (pp. 329-336). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907839_049
Arzarello, F., Bosch, M., Lenfant, A. & Prediger, S. (2007). Different theoretical perspectives in research for teaching problems to research problems. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Phillipou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th congress of European society for research in mathematics education (CERME5) (pp. 1618-1627). Cyprus: ERME.
Artigue, M. (2007). Digital technologies: a window on theoretical issues. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Phillipou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th congress of European society for research in mathematics education (CERME5) (pp. 68-82). Cyprus: ERME.
Bergsten, C. (2008). How do theories influence the research on teaching and learning limits of functions. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40 (2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0083-2
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique. Revised edition. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Les éditions de minuit. Bourdieu, P. (1994). In other words. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique: Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble: La penseé Sauvage.
Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3-38). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Dörfler, W. (1993). Quality criteria for journals in the field of didactics of mathematics. In G. Nissen & M. Blomhøj (Eds.), Criteria for scientific quality and relevance in the didactics of mathematics [report from symposium held in Gilleleje, Denmark, April 27 to May 2, 1992] (pp. 75-87). IMFUFA, Roskilde University.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity- theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work,14 (1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: The Falmer Press.
Fischer, R. (1993). Mathematics as a means and as a system. In S. Restivo, J. P. van Bendegem & R. Fischer (Eds.), Math worlds. Philosophical and social studies of mathematics and mathematics education (pp. 113-133). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gellert, U. (2010). Modalities of a local integration of theories in mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: seeking new frontiers (pp. 537-550). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_50
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational development and developmental research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 443-471. https://doi.org/10.2307/749485
Kilpatrick, J. (1993). Beyond face value: assessing research in mathematics education. In G. Nissen & M. Blomhøj (Eds.), Criteria for scientific quality and relevance in the didactics of mathematics [report from symposium held in Gilleleje, Denmark, April 27 to May 2, 1992] (pp. 15-34). IMFUFA, Roskilde University.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lerman, S. (2006). Theories of mathematics education: Is plurality a problem? ZDM - Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38 (1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655902
Lester, F. K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. ZDM - Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37 (6), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655854
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Edition Plon.
Niss, M. (2007). The concept and role of theory in mathematics education. In C. Bergsten, B. Grevholm, H. S. Måsøval & F. Rønning (Eds.), Relating practice and research in mathematics education. Proceedings of NORMA 05. Fourth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 97-110). Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.
Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: first steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40 (2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0086-z
Radford, L. (2008). Connecting theories in mathematics education: challenges and possibilities. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40 (2), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0090-3
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Sierpinska, A. & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.) (1998). Mathematics education as a research domain: a search for identity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5190-0
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a theory of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3556-8
Sriraman, B. & English, L. (2005). Theories of mathematics education: a global survey of theoretical frameworks/trends in mathematics education research. ZDM - Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37 (6), 450-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655853
Wedege, T. (1999). To know - or not to know - mathematics, that is a question of context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39 (1-3), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003871930181
Wedege, T. (2006). Hvorfor stave problematik med q? - hvad, hvordan og hvorfor i matematikkens didaktik. In O. Skovsmose & M. Blomhøj (Eds.), Kunne det tænkes? - Om matematiklæring (pp. 312-332). Copenhagen: Malling Beck.
Wedege, T. (Ed.) (2008). Identitet og forskning: ni essays om at blive matematikdidaktisk forsker. Copenhagen: NAVIMAT.
Wedege, T. (2009). Quality of research papers: specific criteria in the field of adults learning mathematics? Adults Learning Mathematics: an International Journal, 4 (1), 6-15.
Wedege, T. (2010). Commentary on modalities of a local integration of theories in mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: seeking new frontiers (pp. 551-555). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_52
Wedege, T. (in press). Combining and coordinating theoretical perspectives in mathematics education research. In F. Arzarello et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME6), January 28 to February 1, 2009, Lyon. Université de Lyon.
Zan, R. (2004). The quality of research in mathematics education. Published by Discussion Group 8, The quality and relevance in mathematics education research. Retrieved on 1 July, 2009 from www.icme10.dk (Programme - DG8)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
