What is quality in a PhD dissertation in mathematics education?

Authors

  • Mogens Niss

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v15i1.148234

Abstract

The present paper discusses the issue of quality in PhD dissertations in mathematics education on the basis of the author’s reflections, observations and experiences as a supervisor and as an assessor of PhD dissertations in several countries during the last three decades. Thus, the paper represents the personal stances and views of the author and does not claim to be written on behalf of any segment of the community of researchers in mathematics education. Two major components of quality in a PhD dissertation are being dealt with, quality of the underlying research, and quality of the dissertation as a reflective report of this research and its outcomes. Particular attention is being paid to the issue of what should cause a dissertation to be rejected. The paper emphasises, at the end, that because of the multiplicity of research paradigms and philosophies in research in mathematics education there is no royal road to quality in a PhD dissertation. Therefore, the student cannot avoid involving him- or herself in independent in-depth thinking.

References

Grevholm, B. (2008). Nordic doctoral programmes in mathematics education. In R. Reys & J. Dossey (Eds.), U.S. doctorates in mathematics education: developing stewards of the discipline (pp. 189-194). Providence: American Mathematical Society. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/015/20

Grevholm, B., Persson, L.-E. & Wall, P. (2005). A dynamic model for education of doctoral students and guidance of supervisors in research groups. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60 (2), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-4497-2

Lester, F. & Lambdin, S. (1998). The ship of Theseus and other metaphors for thinking about what we value in mathematics education research. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: a search for identity (pp. 415-426). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5196-2_13

Niss, M. (2007a). The concept and role of theory in mathematics education. In C. Bergsten, B. Grevholm, H. Måsøval & F. Rønning (Eds.), Relating practice and research in mathematics education. Proceedings of Norma05, fourth Nordic conference on mathematics education (pp. 97-110). Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.

Niss, M. (2007b). Reflections on the state of and trends in research on mathematics teaching and learning. From here to Utopia. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1293-1312). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Schoenfeld, A. (2007). Method. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 69-107). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2010-03-10

How to Cite

Niss, M. (2010). What is quality in a PhD dissertation in mathematics education?. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v15i1.148234

Issue

Section

Articles