30 years of solitary confinement: what has changed, and what still needs to happen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v32i1-2.131384Keywords:
solitary confinement, torture, human rights, Nelson Mandela Rules, Medical ethics, history of torture, torture journalAbstract
Solitary confinement cells are where those considered to be too dangerous to themselves or to others, too troublesome, too mentally unwell, or simply different, will be locked away, spending 22-24 hours a day alone, out of sight and out of mind.
Solitary confinement is an extreme and harmful practice on the cusp of prohibited treatment of people deprived of their liberty, with potentially grave consequences for the individuals concerned and the societies to which they eventually return.
This article reflects on some of the achievements, and remaining challenges, around the use and regulation of solitary confinement practices internationally in the last 30 years, drawing on recent developments and the author’s work in the area.
References
Akil, H. (2019). The Brain in Isolation. In:
Lobel, J., & Smith, P. S. (Eds.). (2019).
Solitary confinement: Effects, practices,
and pathways toward reform. Oxford
University Press. pp 199-2019. DOI:10.1093/
oso/9780190947927.001.0001
Blake, W. (2016), A sentence worse than death. In:
Casella, J., Ridgeway, J., and Shourd, S. (Eds.)
Hell Is a Very Small Place: Voices from Solitary
Confinement. (2016) The New Press, New York
London.
British Medical Association (BMA), Royal College
of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) and Royal College
of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH).
Joint position statement on solitary confinement
of children and young people. September 2018.
https://www.bma.org.uk/media/1859/bmasolitary-
confinement-in-youth-detention-jointstatement-
Casella, J., Ridgeway, J., and Shourd, S. (Eds.) Hell Is
a Very Small Place: Voices from Solitary Confinement.
(2016) The New Press, New York London.
Cloud, D. H., Augustine, D., Ahalt, C., Haney, C.,
Peterson, L., Braun, C., & Williams, B. (2021).
“We just needed to open the door”: a case study
of the quest to end solitary confinement in North
Dakota. Health Justice, 9(1), 28. https://doi.
org/10.1186/s40352-021-00155-5
Cohen, S., (2001) States of Denial: Knowing about
Atrocities and Suffering. Polity Press: Cambridge.
Cohn, M. (Ed.). (2011). The United States and
torture: Interrogation, incarceration, and abuse.
NYU Press
Coppola, F., The Brain in Solitude: An(other) Eighth
Amendment Challenge to Solitary Confinement,
Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 1–42 (2019)
DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsz014
Dagan N., Shalev S., The role of Israeli judges in
authorising solitary confinement placements:
Balancing human rights and risk, or neutralising
responsibility? Punishment & Society. May 2021.
doi:10.1177/14624745211019112 (open access)
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture
(CPT) Country Reports and Standards. Available
at https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/humanrights.
Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) Primer on
“Cross Cultural Rapport-Based Interrogation”,
/1/2010, released to the American Civil
Liberties Union in May 2012 (unpublished).
Finely, B. (2009). Supermax too full for Guantanamo
detainees. Denver Post, 21 May 2009 https://www.
denverpost.com/2009/05/21/supermax-too-fullfor-
guantanamo-detainees
Ginbar, Y. (2008) Why not torture terrorists? moral,
practical, and legal aspects of the” ticking bomb”
justification for torture. Oxford University
Press on Demand. DOI:10.1093/acprof:
oso/9780199540914.001.0001
Haney, C. (2018) Restricting the use of solitary
confinement. Annual Review of Criminology
(1): 285–310. doi 10.1146/annurevcriminol-
-092326
Haney, C. (2018). The psychological effects of
solitary confinement: A systematic critique.
Crime and Justice, 47(1), 365-416. https://doi.
org/10.1086/696041
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons. Thematic
report on the Separation of children in young
offender institutions, January 2020. https://www.
justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/wpcontent/
uploads/sites/4/2020/01/Separation-ofchildren-
thematic-Web-2019.pdf
Huber, A. The relevance of the Mandela Rules in
Europe. ERA Forum 17, 299–310 (2016). https://
doi.org/10.1007/s12027-016-0427-2
Human Rights Watch, Turkey: Small Group Isolation
in F-type Prisons and the Violent Transfers
of Prisoners to Sincan, Kandira, and Edirne
Prisons on December 19, 2000, 5 April 2001,
D1302, available at: https://www.refworld.org/
docid/3bd023992.html [accessed 18 November
Jeffreys, D. (2013). Spirituality in Dark Places: the
ethics of solitary confinement. Springer.
Morgan, R., & Evans, M. (2002). Combating
torture in Europe: the work and standards of
the European Committee for the Prevention of
Torture (CPT). Council of Europe.
Morgan, R. D., Gendreau, P., Smith, P., Gray, A. L.,
Labrecque, R. M., MacLean, N., Van Horn, S.
A., Bolanos, A. D., Batastini, A. B., & Mills, J.
F. (2016). Quantitative syntheses of the effects
of administrative segregation on inmates’ wellbeing.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4),
–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000089
O’Donnell, I. (2014). Prisoners, solitude, and time.
Oxford University Press.
O’Keefe, M. L., Klebe, K. J., Metzner, J., Dvoskin, J.,
Fellner, J., & Stucker, A. (2013). A longitudinal
study of administrative segregation. Journal of
the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Online, 41(1), 49-60.
O’Mara, S. (2015) Why torture doesn’t work: the
neuroscience of interrogation, Harvard University
Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674915510
Penal Reform International (2017). Essex paper
: Initial guidance on the interpretation and
implementation of the Nelson Mandela Rules.
Online: https://www.penalreform.org/resource/
guidance-on-implementation-the-nelsonmandela-
rules/
Perez-Sales P. (2016). Psychological Torture:
Definition, evaluation and measurement.
Routledge Books. London https://doi.
org/10.4324/9781315616940
Physicians for Human Rights (2007) Leave No
Marks: Enhanced interrogation techniques and
the risk of criminality. Physicians For Human
Rights, Boston, NJ.
Raemisch, R. (2019). Colorado Ends Prolonged,
Indeterminate Solitary Confinement. In: Lobel &
Scharff Smith, op cit., at 311.
Reyes, H. (2007) The worst scars are in the mind:
psychological torture. International Review of the
Red Cross Volume 89 Number 867 September
Online at: https://international-review.icrc.
org/sites/default/files/irrc-867-5.pdf DOI: https://
doi.org/10.1017/S1816383107001300
Rodley, N., & Pollard, M. (2009). The treatment
of prisoners under international law. Oxford
University Press on Demand. DOI:10.1093/acpr
of:osobl/9780199693566.001.0001
Scharff-Smith, P. (2008) Solitary confinement:
An introduction to the Istanbul Statement on
the Use and Effects of Solitary Confinement
February 2008 Torture Journal 18(1):56-62
Shalev, S. (2021) First, Do No Harm: segregation,
restraint, and pepper spray use in women’s
prisons in New Zealand. New Zealand Human
Rights Commission, Wellington.
Shalev, S. (2015) Solitary confinement as a prison
health issue. In: Enggist S, Moller L, Galea G,
et al. (eds) Prisons and Health: A World Health
Organisation Guide to the Essentials in Prison
Health (2nd ed.). Copenhagen: WHO, pp. 27–35.
Shalev, S. (2009) Supermax: controlling risk through
solitary confinement. Willan: Abingdon.
Shalev, S. (2011) Solitary Confinement and
Supermax Prisons: A Human Rights
and Ethical Analysis, Journal of Forensic
Psychology Practice, 11:2-3, 151-183, DOI:
1080/15228932.2011.537582
Shalev, S., Lloyd, M., (2011) Though this be method,
yet there is madness in’t: Commentary on One
Year Longitudinal Study of the Psychological
Effects of Administrative Segregation.
Corrections & Mental Health
Snacken, S. (2010). Resisting punitiveness in Europe?
Theoretical Criminology, 14(3), 273-292. https://
doi.org/10.1177/1362480610370165
Smith, C. S. (2007). Bad men: Guantanamo Bay and
the secret prisons. Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
Sprott, J. B., Doob, A.N., & Ifene, A. (2021). Do
Independent External Decision Makers Ensure
that “An Inmate’s Confinement in a Structured
Intervention Unit Is to End as Soon as Possible”?
Fourth report on Correctional Service Canada’s
(CSC) “Structured Intervention Units” (SIUs).
Online: https://www.crimsl.utoronto.ca/news/
reports-canada%E2%80%99s-structuredintervention-
units
Sykes GM and Matza D (1957) Techniques
of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.
American Sociological Review 22(6): 664-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
Wildeman, C., & Andersen, L. H. (2020). Solitary
confinement placement and post-release
mortality risk among formerly incarcerated
individuals: a population-based study. The Lancet
Public Health, 5(2), 107-113. DOI:https://doi.
org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30271-3
Wright, T. (2019). Canada’s new solitary confinement
bill makes it easier to put inmates in isolation,
senator says. The Canadian Press, 5 May 2019.
Online: https://globalnews.ca/news/5241955/
canada-solitary-confinement-bill-inmatesisolation/
United Nations Basic Principles for the Treatment of
Prisoners, adopted and proclaimed by General
Assembly resolution 45/111 of 14 December
United Nations General Assembly GA/SHC/4014, 18
October 2011
United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women
Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for
Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules)
(resolution 65/229, annex)
United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles
Deprived of their Liberty (resolution 45/113,
annex), 1990
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the
Child (CRC) General comment No. 10 (2007)
Article 37 of the CRC (Children’s Rights
in Juvenile Justice, 25 April 2007, CRC/C/
GC/10, available at: https://www.refworld.org/
docid/4670fca12.html [accessed 25 November
)
Victorian Ombudsman, OPCAT in Victoria, A
thematic investigation of practices related to
solitary confinement of children and young
people (Final Report, 2019).
Washington Post Editorial, Rethinking solitary
confinement. Editorial Board, October 19,
Online: https://www.washingtonpost.
com/opinions/rethinking-solitaryconfinement/
/10/19/1c38cb6c-5579-11e4-
e-602188e70e9c_story.html
Cases cited
United States
Ashker v. Governor of California, No. 4:09-cv-
-CW (N.D. California, 2012)
C.B., et al. v. Walnut Grove Correctional Authority,
et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-663 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 3,
).
Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146, 1261 (N.D.
Cal., 1995).
Ruiz v. Johnson, 37 F. Supp. 2d 855, 908 (S.D.. Tex.
European Court on Human Rights
Ramirez Sanchez v. France. [GC], 2006, § 120
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Torture Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We accept that some authors (e.g. government employees in some countries) are unable to transfer copyright. The Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) covers both the Torture Journal and the IRCT web site. The publisher will not put any limitation on the personal freedom of the author to use material contained in the paper in other works which may be published, provided that acknowledgement is made to the original place of publication.
