Ill-treatment in the Chilean prison system – an analysis of reports presented by the National Institute of Human Rights (INDH) and their handling by the legal actors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v34i1.141671Keywords:
torture; ill-treatment in prison; Istanbul ProtocolAbstract
Prisons in Latin America are often described as violent and lawless places. In this context, we analyse the Chilean case. We want to find out how complaints of torture and ill-treatment are investigated if the victim is a person deprived of liberty? Our hypothesis is that the response to the phenomenon, both in the prosecution of the perpetrators and in the protection of its victims, does not take into consideration the guidelines established in international standards, especially those contained in the Istanbul Protocol.
To this end, we analyse a total of 124 complaints of torture or ill-treatment filed by the Chilean National Human Rights Institute (INDH). This information was then used to research the processing of these cases in the virtual portal of the Chilean Judiciary. In a next step we created a database that contains different information extracted from the electronic case files. This is the source for the quantitative analysis. For the qualitative part of our study, we describe the facts contained in the complaints and document the way they were handled.
The findings confirm our hypothesis. An excessive amount of time elapses between the alleged torture or mistreatment, the filing of complaints, the use of protective measures and the termination of the cases. There are serious deficiencies in the investigations carried out by the Public Prosecutor's Office. Therefore, most of the complaints are not clarified and end up being shelved sooner or later. We conclude that, both the actions of the judges and the prosecutors in the processing of the complaints, make it clear that when it comes to investigating acts of torture or ill-treatment inside Chilean prisons, the standards of the Istanbul Protocol are not met.
References
Albano, G. D., Guadagnino, D., Midiri, M., La spina, C., Tullio, V., Argo, A., & Zerbo, S. (2023). Torture and Maltreatment in Prison: A Medico-Legal Perspective. Healthcare, 11(4), 576. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040576
Barrios A., María C. (2023). La acción de querellante por parte del Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos en delitos cometidos al interior de las cárceles chilenas. In: Stippel, J., & González, P. M. (Eds.), La No Ciudadanía, Sobre la Exclusión Legal y Real de las Personas en el Sistema Carcelario (pp. 193 - 243). Santiago: Tirant lo Blanch.
Brasilia Rules on Access to Justice for Persons in Conditions of Vulnerability (2008). XIV Ibero-American Judicial Summit, 14, 53-75.
Castro M., A., Sanhueza, G. E., Purán, V., & Cortes, J. (2020). Fiscalía Judicial: posibilidades y limitaciones en su rol de inspector de prisiones. Política criminal, 15(30), 871-906.
Centro de Derechos Humanos UDP. (2014). El sistema penitenciario y su impacto en los derechos humanos de las personas privadas de libertad. En Informe sobre Derechos Humanos en Chile (pp. 245-290). Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales. https://derechoshumanos.udp.cl/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Informe_Anual_DDHH_2014_Completo.pdf
Correa Robles, C. (2020). Uso y abuso de la decisión de no perseverar en el procedimiento. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 47(1), 159-185. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34372020000100159
CPT Chile (2022). Diagnóstico de caracterización y vulneraciones a los derechos humanos en el área penitenciaria. https://mnpt.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Resumen-Ejecutivo-Area-Penitenciaria-1.pdf
CPT. (2021). A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention. En Council of Europe. Available in: https://rm.coe.int/1680a3e6a3
Espinoza, O., Martínez, F., & Sanhueza, G. (2014). El sistema penitenciario y su impacto en los derechos humanos de las personas privadas de libertad. In Informe sobre Derechos Humanos en Chile (pp. 245–290). Centro de Derechos Humanos. https://derechoshumanos.udp.cl/informe-anual/informe-anual-sobre-derechos-humanos-en-chile-2014/
Fiscalía. (2023). Boletín Estadístico Anual: Enero-Diciembre 2022. Ministerio Público de Chile.
García, M. y Quesada, L. (2014). Violación sexual e impunidad en el sistema carcelario en Costa Rica. Revista Humanitas, 11 (11), pp. 29-46.
Herceg, J. S. (2020). The silences of torture in Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 40(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2020000100115
INDH (2017). Study of prison conditions in Chile 2014-2015. Seguimiento de recomendaciones y cumplimiento de estándares internacionales sobre el derecho a la integridad personal, Santiago de Chile.
INDH (2018). Estudio de las condiciones carcelarias en Chile. Diagnosis of compliance with international human rights standards on the right to personal integrity, 2016-2017, Santiago de Chile.
Istanbul Protocol, (2022) Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Professional Training Series No. 8/Rev. 2. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Training8Rev2_sp.pdf.
Jenness, V., & Smyth, M. (2011). The passage and implementation of the prison rape elimination act: legal endogeneity and the uncertain road from symbolic law to instrumental effects. STAN. L. & POLICY REV. (Vol. 22:2), pp. 489- 528.
Murton, T. (1976). The dilemma of prison reform, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Nelson Mandela Rules, (2015). UN General Assembly, United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules): resolution / adopted by the General Assembly, 8 January 2016, A/RES/70/175, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5698a3a44.html [accessed 2 October 2023].
Pásara, L. (2015). La justicia en la región andina. Miradas de cerca a Bolivia, Colombia, Chile, Ecuador y Perú. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Pérez Cáceres, D., & Troncoso Zúñiga, C. (2020). Violencia político sexual desde octubre a diciembre de 2019 en chile: análisis de contexto y prácticas institucionales de agentes del estado. Estado, Gobierno Y Gestión Pública, 34, 139–171.
Pérez-Sales, P. (2022). El nuevo Protocolo de Estambul: Guía de uso y consulta para el trabajador apresurado. Torture Journal, 32(3), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v32i3.133932
Rodríguez-Pinzón, D. & Martin, C. (2006). The prohibition of torture and ill-treatment in the inter-American human rights system: A handbook for victims and their advocates. Boris Wijkstrom.
Rodríguez-Pinzón, D., & Martin, C. (2014). A handbook for victims and their advocates: The Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatment in the Inter-American Human Rights System (2.a ed., Vol. 2). OMCT SOS-Torture Network. https://www.omct.org/files/2014/11/22956/v2_web_guide_interamricain_en_omc14.pdf
Rosentreter Z., J. (2020). La práctica de la aplicación del protocolo de estambul en la investigación de la tortura en chile [Tesis para optar al grado de Magíster en Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos]. Universidad Diego Portales.
Sánchez, J. M. A. (2020). Los problemas de la rapidez o ultraceleridad de las audiencias en los procedimientos penales de “menor importancia” para el sistema de justicia penal. Revista de derecho, 27. https://doi.org/10.22199/issn.0718-9753-2020-0003
Sánchez, M., & Piñol, D. (2015). Condiciones de Vida en los centros de privación de libertad en Chile [Life Conditions in carceral centers in Chile]. Centro de Estudios en Seguridad Ciudadana, INAP, Universidad de Chile.
Stippel, J. & Vergara, L. (2023). Los errores de una política penitenciaria mal enfocada. In Fundación Chile21 (Ed.), Informe Mayo 2023 (pp. 10-17). Fundación Chile21.
Stippel, J. A., Pérez, P., & Barría, M. (2023). On "epistemic injustice" and victimization in prisons: an empiric exploration into Chilean reality. Revista Brasileira De Direito Processual Penal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.803
Stippel, J., & Medina, P. (2022a). Discrimination in criminal prosecution: About the differences between crimes committed inside prison and crimes committed outside prison. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.679
Stippel, J., & Medina, P. (2022b). Due diligence in prison crime investigations and access to criminal justice for persons deprived of liberty in Chile. In: Justicia Y Legitimidad En América. Judicial spaces for vulnerable groups of special protection; Bélanger, P. G., Argente Villarreal, A., & Sandoval Mesa J. A., (cords.); Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Estado de México; Mexico 2023. 79-115.
Tapia Silva, M. (2023). Manual Derecho Penitenciario Chileno, Editorial Tirant lo Blanch ISBN: 9788411309158. First edition, March 2023.
United Nations (2010). Handbook for Prison Leaders: A Basic Training Tool and Curriculum for Prison Managers Based on International Standards (Revised edition). United Nations.
United Nations (2023). Preliminary observations of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Dr. Alice Jill Edwards, at the conclusion of her visit to Chile. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/torture/sr/preliminary-observations-srt-mission-chile-25102023.pdf
United Nations. (2017). Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention pursuant to the optional reporting procedure.
Vío Vargas, J. (Ed.). (2023). Estudio sobre los fallecimientos en las cárceles chilenas desde enero del año 2019 hasta diciembre del año 2022. Panorama, diagnóstico y propuestas. Morir en prisión. Estudios sobre fallecimientos en cárceles, 1-97.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Torture Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We accept that some authors (e.g. government employees in some countries) are unable to transfer copyright. The Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) covers both the Torture Journal and the IRCT web site. The publisher will not put any limitation on the personal freedom of the author to use material contained in the paper in other works which may be published, provided that acknowledgement is made to the original place of publication.
