Protocol on medico-legal documentation of threats

Authors

  • Pau Perez Sales SiR[a]
  • Marie Brasholt Dignity
  • Olena Podolian FORPOST
  • Yulia Honchar FORPOST
  • Ergün Cakal University of Oslo
  • Elna Søndergaard DIGNITY - Danish Institute against Torture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v33i1.134689

Keywords:

medico-legal, torture, documentation of torture, threats

Abstract

Introduction. The use of threats remains prevalent
in law enforcement practices in many
parts of the world. In studies with torture survivors,
credible and immediate threats have
been considered a distinctly harmful method
of torture. Notwithstanding this prevalence,
there is a considerable degree of difficulty in
legally substantiating and establishing harms
produced by threatening acts. It is also generally
difficult to clearly identify the harms
that go beyond the fear and stress inherent
(therefore not unlawful) in law enforcement
practices. We present a Protocol on Medico-
Legal Documentation of Threats. The aim
of the Protocol is to improve documentation
and assessment of harms so that stronger legal
claims can be submitted to local and international
complaints mechanisms.
Methods. The Protocol has been developed
based on a methodology initiated by the Public
Committee against Torture in Israel (PCATI),
REDRESS and the DIGNITY - Danish Institute
against Torture (DIGNITY) involving:
compilation and review of health and legal
knowledge on threats; initial drafting by the
lead author; discussion among the members of
the International Expert Group on Psychological
Torture; pilot-testing in Ukraine by local
NGO Forpost; adjustments were made according
to the results of the pilot study.
Results. We present the final Protocol and
a Quick Interviewing Guide. This Protocol is
cognisant of the significance of the specific
social, cultural, and political contexts in which
threats are made and might be subjected to adaptations
to specific contexts. We hope that it
will improve the documentation of threats as
a torture method or as part of a torturing environment,
as well as inform efforts on their
prevention more broadly.

Author Biographies

Pau Perez Sales, SiR[a]

Psychiatrist. Clinical Director

Marie Brasholt, Dignity

Medical Director

Olena Podolian, FORPOST

Psychologist

Yulia Honchar, FORPOST

Legal Advisor

Ergün Cakal, University of Oslo

Lawyer

References

Cakal, E. (2021). Perception, practice and proximity.

Qualifying threats as psychological torture in

international law. Torture Journal 31(1), 19-36.

Carleton, R. N. (2016). Fear of the unknown:

One fear to rule them all? Journal of Anxiety

Disorders, 41, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

janxdis.2016.03.011

ECHR. (1982). Campbell and Cosans v. United

Kingdom. 7511/76, 7743/76. ECHR. (1990).

Guzzardi v. Italy. 7367/76.

ECHR. (1997). Raninen v. Finland. 20972/92. ECHR.

(1999). Selmouni v. France. 25803/94. ECHR.

(2009). Bouyid v. Belgium. 23380/09 [GC].

ECHR. (2010). Gäfgen v. Germany. 22978/05.

ECHR. (2012). El Masri v. Macedonia. 39630/09.

ECHR. (2013). Strelets v. Russia. 28018/05.

ECHR. (2014). Husayn (Zubaydah) v. Poland.

/13. ECommHR. (1969). Greek Case. 12

ECHRYb.

Fava, G. A., Tomba, E., Brakemeier, E. L., Carrozzino,

D., Cosci, F., Eöry, A., Leonardi, T., Schamong,

I., & Guidi, J. (2019). Mental Pain as a

Transdiagnostic Patient- Reported Outcome

Measure. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 88(6),

–349. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504024

Feng, P., Becker, B., Zheng, Y., & Feng, T. (2018).

Sleep deprivation affects fear memory

consolidation: Bi-stable amygdala connectivity

with insula and ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(2),

–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx148

Glenn, D. E., Risbrough, V. B., Simmons, A.

N., Acheson, D. T., & Stout, D. M. (2017).

The Future of Contextual Fear Learning

for PTSD Research: A Methodological

Review of Neuroimaging Studies. In Brain

Imaging in Behavioral Neuroscience (Issue

November 2011, pp. 207–228). https://doi.

org/10.1007/7854_2017_30

Grenier, S., Barrette, A. M., & Ladouceur, R. (2005).

Intolerance of uncertainty and intolerance of

ambiguity: Similarities and differences. Personality

and Individual Differences, 39(3), 593–600. https://

doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.014

Gullone, E., King, N. J., & Ollendick, T. H. (2000).

The Development and Psychometric Evaluation

of the Fear Experiences Questionnaire: An

Attempt to Disentangle the Fear and Anxiety

Constructs. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,

(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/

(SICI)1099-0879(200002)7:1<61::AIDCPP227>

0.CO;2-P

IACtHR. (2006). Baldeón-García v. Peru. 06 April

Series C No. 147.

IACtHR. (2000). Case of Cantoral-Benavides.

Judgment of August 18, 2000. Series C No. 69.

IACtHR. (2003). Maritza Urrutia v. Guatemala. 27

November 2003. Series C No. 103. IACtHR.

(2004). Tibi v. Ecuador. Preliminary objections,

merits, reparations and costs,

IACHR Series C no 114, IHRL 1497, 7th September

LeDoux, J. E. (2020). How does the non-conscious

become conscious? Current Biology, 30(5), R196–

R199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.033

LeDoux, J. E. (2014). Coming to terms with fear.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of

the United States of America, 111(8), 2871–2878.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400335111

LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016). Using

neuroscience to help understand fear and

anxiety: A two-system framework. American

Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.

https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030353

Mertens, G., & Engelhard, I. M. (2020). A systematic

review and meta-analysis of the evidence for

unaware fear conditioning. Neuroscience and

Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 254–268. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.012

Milburn, T. W. (1977). The Nature of Threat. Journal

of Social Issues, 33(1), 126–139. https://doi.

org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01872.x

Pérez-Sales, P. (2017). Psychological Torture: Definition,

Evaluation and Measurement. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616940

Pérez-Sales, P., Søndergaard, E., Shir, E., Cakal, E.,

& Brasholt, M. (2019). Protocol on Medico-

Legal Documentation of Sleep Deprivation.

Torture Journal, 29(2), 28–55. https://doi.

org/10.7146/torture.v29i2.116320.

Pérez-Sales, P. (2021). Defining and documenting

threats in the context of ill-treatment and torture.

Torture Journal 31(1), 3-18.

Pryce, C. R., Azzinnari, D., Spinelli, S., Seifritz,

E., Tegethoff, M., & Meinlschmidt,

G. (2011). Helplessness: A systematic

translational review of theory and evidence

for its relevance to understanding and treating

depression. Pharmacology and Therapeutics,

(3), 242–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

pharmthera.2011.06.006

Søndergaard, E., Skilbeck, R., & Shir, E. (2019).

Development of interdisciplinary protocols on

medico-legal documentation of torture: Sleep

deprivation. Torture Journal, 29(2), 23–27.

Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening

events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American

Psychologist, 38, 1161–1171.

Tempesta, D., Salfi, F., De Gennaro, L., & Ferrara,

M. (2020). The impact of five nights of sleep

restriction on emotional reactivity. Journal of

Sleep Research, January, e13022. https://doi.

org/10.1111/jsr.13022

Published

2023-03-17

How to Cite

Pérez-Sales, P., Brasholt, M., Podolian, O., Honchar, Y., Cakal, E., & Søndergaard, E. (2023). Protocol on medico-legal documentation of threats. Torture Journal, 33(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v33i1.134689

Issue

Section

Special section: forensic documentation of psychological torture