Who are they to say? Experiences and legal recognition of victimhood of enforced disappearance in Colombia and El Salvador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v31i2.125771Keywords:
victims, victimhood, recognitionAbstract
Enforced disappearance (ED) not only affects the persons who are deprived of their liberty, but also their next of kin who do not know what happened to their loved one. Their suffering of not knowing has been coined as “ambiguous loss” within psycho-social scholarship and is regarded in law as a form of inhumane treatment which violates the prohibition of torture. ED is attached to a complex experience of victimhood in victims they struggle for social and political recognition of the injustices they suffered. Using the social science notions of “victimhood” and “recognition” on one hand, and the legal perspectives on the other hand, we address the knowledge gap remaining regarding the interactions of the two viewpoints on the issue of ED. For this paper, we carried out a multidisciplinary analysis of the iterative relationship between both perspectives looking at the historical development of the legal landscape and interviewing victims and search actors in the cases of Colombia and El Salvador. We aim to understand the meanings of recognition and victimhood for victims in Colombia and El Salvador against the backdrop of the legal frameworks and state responses they are subjected to. This analysis offers us also valuable insight into victims’ agency and the meanings they afford to victimhood, as well as how political and social constructions of victimhood may facilitate or hinder victims’ struggles for truth and justice.
References
References
Adams, J. (2019). Enforced Disappearance: Family Members’ Experiences. Human Rights Review, 20(3), 335-360. doi: 10.1007/s12142-019-0546-6
Boss, P. (2004). Ambiguous loss research, theory, and practice: Reflections after 9/11. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 551-566. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00037.x
Bouris, E. (2007). Complex political victims. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press, Inc.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Dulitzky, A. E. (2019). The Latin-American Flavour of Enforced Disappearances. Chicago Journal of International Law, 19(2), 423-489. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol19/iss2/3
De Greiff, P. (2012). Theorizing Transitional Justice. American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, 51, 31-77.
Fulton, S. (2014). Redress for enforced disappearance. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 12(4), 769-786. Doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqu044
García-Godos J., & Lid K. (2010). Transitional Justice and Victims' Rights before the End of a Conflict: The Unusual Case of Colombia. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(3), 487-516. doi:10.1017/S0022216X10000891
Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2014). From Transitional to Transformative Justice: A New Agenda for Practice. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(3), 339–361. Doi: 10.1093/ijtj/iju013
Haldemann, F. (2008). Another King of Justice: Transitional Justice as Recognition. Cornell International Law Journal, 41(3), 675-737. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol41/iss3/3. Last accessed May 10th 2021.
Hearty, K. (2018). ‘Victims of’ human rights abuses in transitional justice: hierarchies, perpetrators and the struggle for peace. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(7), 888-909. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2018.1485656
Barton-Hronešová, J. (2018). The Struggle for Redress. Victim Capital in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Kovras, I. (2017). The Daughters of Antigone in Latin America: Argentinian Mothers. In I. Kovras (ed.), Grassroots Activism and the Evolution of Transitional Justice: The Families of the Disappeared (pp. 61-83). London: Cambridge University Press.
McCrory, S. (2007). The International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance. Human Rights Law Review, 7(3), 545–566. Doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngm021
McEvoy, K., & McConnachie, K. (2013). Victimology in transitional justice: Victimhood, innocence and hierarchy. European Journal of Criminology, 9(5), 527-538. DOI: 10.1177/1477370812454204
Naftali, P. (2016). Crafting a “Right to Truth” in International Law: Converging Mobilizations, Diverging Agendas? Champ pénal/Penal field, vol. XIII, janvier 2016. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/champpenal.9245. Last accessed on May 10th 2021.
Robins, S. (2013). An Empirical Approach to Post-conflict Legitimacy: Victims' Needs and the Everyday. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 7(1), 45-64. DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2012.655618
Rudling, A. (2019). "I'm Not that Chained-Up Little Person": Four Paragons of
Victimhood in Transitional Justice Discourse. Human Rights Quarterly, 41(2), 421-440. DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2019.0032
Salih M. and Samarasinghe G. (2107). Families of the missing in Sri Lanka: Psychosocial considerations in transitional justice mechanisms. International Review of the Red Cross, 99(2), 497–517. DOI: 10.1017/S1816383118000516
Vera Lugo, J. P. (2016). Transitional Justice, Memory and the Emergence of Legal Subjectivities in Columbia. In S. Brunnegger & K. A. Faulk (Eds.), A Sense of Justice: Legal Knowledge and Lived Experience in Latin America (pp. 25-49). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
De Waardt, M. (2016). Naming and shaming victims: The semantics of victimhood. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10, 432–450. DOI: 10.1093/ijtj/ijw011
Wilke, C. (2007). Recognizing Victimhood: Politics and Narratives of Rehabilitation in Germany. Journal of Human Rights, 6, 479–496. DOI: 10.1080/14754830701693045
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Torture Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We accept that some authors (e.g. government employees in some countries) are unable to transfer copyright. The Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) covers both the Torture Journal and the IRCT web site. The publisher will not put any limitation on the personal freedom of the author to use material contained in the paper in other works which may be published, provided that acknowledgement is made to the original place of publication.
