Pragmatisme og "practice turn"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/sl.v0i64.104110Nøgleord:
Pragmatism, Dewey, Practice Turn, Experience, Technology, Anti-Representationalism, Anti-FoundationalismResumé
Practices are of central relevance both to philosophical pragmatism and to the recent ‘Practice Turn’ in social sciences and philosophy. However, what counts as practices and how practices and knowledge are combined or intertwine varies in the different approaches of pragmatism and those theories that are covered by the umbrella term ‘Practice Turn’. The paper tries to show that the pragmatism of John Dewey is able to offer both a more precise and a more radical understanding of practices than the recent ‘Practice Turn’ allows for. The paper on the one hand highlights what pragmatism has to offer to the practice turn in order to clarify the notion of practice. On the other hand the paper claims that a pragmatism inspired by Dewey actually interprets ‘practices’ more radically than most of the other approaches and furthermore promotes an understanding of science that combines nonrepresentationalism and anti-foundationalism with an involvement of the philosopher or the social scientist in the production of knowledge, things and technologies.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Ophavsretten til artiklerne i Slagmark deles mellem forfatter og Forlaget Slagmark.
Artikler og tekstmateriale publiceret i Slagmark må citeres, downloades og videresendes for ikke-kommerciel brug, under forudsætning af normal akademisk reference til forfatter(e) samt tidsskrift, årgang, nummer og sider.
Brug og distribution af tekstmateriale både i form af papirkopier og elektroniske kopier, til undervisningsbrug på uddannelsesinstitutioner og intern brug er tilladt efter aftale med Copydan Tekst & Node. Brugen skal ske inden for aftalens rammer.
Artikler og tekster må kun genudgives med eksplicit tilladelse fra forfatter(e) og tidsskriftet med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.