Coaches’ perception of team cohesion in national teams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/sjsep.v8i.162423Keywords:
Coach-athlete Relationship, Coaching, Team Structure, Bonding, Communication, Elite Sport, National TeamAbstract
The main purpose of this study was to investigate how coaches experience and describe the phenomenon of team cohesion in national teams. Eight national team coaches from individual and team sports were interviewed. The interview guide was rooted in the theory of cohesion in sports groups and reflexive thematic analysis was utilized as our methodological approach. The results of the analysis identified four main themes related to cohesion: 1) Being part of a national team is attractive, 2) Quality relationships, 3) Formal and informal structure, and 4) Adaptive communication. The findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of cohesion in national teams through the coaches’ perspectives.
References
Alharahsheh, H. H., & Pius, A. (2020). A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2020.v02i03.001
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
Barsade, S. G., Coutifaris, C. G., & Pillemer, J. (2018). Emotional contagion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.005
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989-1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. SAGE.
Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1993). The influence of the group and its cohesiveness on perceptions of group goal-related variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.15.3.245
Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I. D., & Côté, J. (2014). Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.003
Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretation and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4(2),123-138. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.4.2.123
Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. I: J. L. Duda (Ed.). Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Fitness Information Technology.
Carron, A. V., Colman, M. M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 168-188. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.24.2.168
Carron, A. V. & Eys, M. A (2012). Group dynamics in sport. Fitness Information Technology.
Carron, A. V., Martin, L. J., & Loughead, T. M. (2012). Teamwork and Performance. In S. M. Murphy (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of sport and performance psychology, (pp. 309-327). Oxford University Press.
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(3), 244-266. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.7.3.244
Chelladurai, P. (2007). Leadership in sports. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.). Handbook of sport psychology, 3ed. (pp.111-135). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chowdhury, S. (2005). The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(3), 310-326. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604504
Costa, A. C. (2003). Understanding the nature and antecedents of trust within work teams. I: B. Nooteboom & F. Six (Eds.). The trust process in organizations: Empirical studies of the determinants and the process of trust development. (pp. 105-124). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative & mixed methods approaches (5 ed.). Sage.
Cunningham, I. J., & Eys, M. A. (2007). Role ambiguity and intra‐team communication in interdependent sport teams. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2220-2237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00256.x
De Bosscher, V., Bingham, J., Shibli, S., van Bottenburg, M. & De Knop, P. (2008). The global sporting arms race: An international comparative study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Meyer & Meyer Sport.
Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (2012). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 43(6), 690-701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222002
Eys, M., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2025). (Re) conceptualizing cohesion: A theoretical realignment and roadmap for future research. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 81, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102970
Eys, M. A., & Brawley, L. R. (2018). Reflections on cohesion research with sport and exercise groups. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12379
Eys, M., Evans, M. B., Martin, L. J., Ohlert, J., Wolf, S. A., Van Bussel, M., & Steins, C. (2015). Cohesion and performance for female and male sport teams. The Sport Psychologist, 29(2), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2014-0027
Eys, M. A., Hardy, J., Carron, A. V., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2003). The relationship between task cohesion and competitive state anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(1), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.1.66
Eys, M. A., Loughead, T. M., & Hardy, J. (2007). Athlete leadership dispersion and satisfaction in interactive sport teams. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(3), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.04.005
Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Human Kinetics.
Filho, E., Dobersek, U., Gershgoren, L., Becker, B., & Tenenbaum, G. (2014). The cohesion-performance relationship in sport: A 10-year retrospective meta-analysis. Sport Sciences for Health, 10(3), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-014-0188-7
Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group Dynamics 6.ed. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Forsyth, D. R. (2021). Recent advances in the study of group cohesion. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 25(3), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000163
Fransen, K., Vanbeselaere, N., De Cuyper, B., Vande Broek, G., & Boen, F. (2014). The myth of the team captain as principal leader: Extending the athlete leadership classification within sport teams. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(14), 1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.891291
Fransen, K., Vanbeselaere, N., Exadaktylos, V., Vande Broek, G., De Cuyper, B., Berckmans, D., Ceux, T. & Boen, F. (2012). “Yes, we can!”: Perceptions of collective efficacy sources in volleyball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(7), 641-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.653579
Furley, P., & Schweizer, G. (2020). Body language in sport. In G. Tenenbaum, R. C. Eklund, & N. Boiangin (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (Fourth Edition, Volume II). (pp. 1201-1219). John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Giske, R., Gjerde, J., Høigaard, R., & Johansen, B. T. (2022). Shared mental models: national representative coaches' thinking on importance, characteristics, and development. Journal of Expertise, 5(1), 2573-2773. https://www.journalofexpertise.org/articles/volume5_issue1/JoE_5_1_Giske_etal.html
Giske, R., Rodahl, S., Haugen, T., & Høigaard, R. (2017). Shared mental models, role ambiguity, team identification and social loafing in elite sports groups: a mediation analysis. Sport and Exercise Psychology Review,13 (2), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpssepr.2017.13.2.2
Giske, R., Rodahl, S. E., & Høigaard, R. (2015). Shared mental task models in elite ice hockey and handball teams: Does it exist and how does the coach intervene to make an impact? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 27(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2014.940431
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Haslam, S. A (2004). Psychology in organizations. Sage.
Haslam, S. A., Boen, F., & Fransen, K. (2020). The new psychology of sport and exercise: the social identity approach. Sage.
Haugen, T., Peters, D. M., Ommundsen, Y., Martin, L. J., Stenling, A., & Høigaard, R. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the Norwegian versions of the modified group environment questionnaire and the youth sport environment questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 25(4), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2021.1917414
Holt, N. L., & Sparkes, A. C. (2001). An ethnographic study of cohesiveness in a college soccer team over a season. The Sport Psychologist, 15(3), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.15.3.237
Horn, T. (2008). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. A. Horn (Ed.). Advances in Sport Psychology (pp. 239-267). Human Kinetics .
Høigaard, R. (2020). Gruppedynamikk og ledelse i idrett [Group Dynamik and Leadership in Sport]. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Høigaard, R., Boen, F., De Cuyper, B., & Peters, D. M. (2013). Team identification reduces social loafing and promotes social laboring in cycling. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 25, 1/30. https://doi.org/10.24985/ijass.2013.25.1.33
Høigaard, R., Säfvenbom, R., & Tønnessen, F. E. (2006). The relationship between group cohesion, group norms, and perceived social loafing in soccer teams. Small Group Research, 37(3), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406287311
Høigaard, R., Tofteland, I., & Ommundsen, Y. (2006). The effect of team cohesion on social loafing in relay teams. International Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 18(1), 59-73. http://www.communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8/10887248/the_effect_of_team_cohesion_on_social_loafing_in_relay_teams.pdf
Høigaard, R., Erikson, B. Hedegart, V. B, Sæther S. A. & Haugen, T. (2026). Kohesjon i landslag – fra et spillerperspektiv [Cohesion in the national team -from a player perspective]. In S. A. Sæther & R. Høigaard (Eds.). Toppidrett i Skandinavia. En samfunnsvitenskapelig forskningsantologi om utviklings og prestasjonsmiljø. (pp. 271-285). Cappelen Damm Akademisk
Kozub, S. A., & Button, C. J. (2000). The influence of a competitive outcome on perceptions of cohesion in rugby and swimming teams. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31(1), 82–95.
Kuettel, A., & Larsen, C. H. (2020). Risk and protective factors for mental health in elite athletes: a scoping review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1), 231–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2019.1689574
Larsen, M. L., Sæther S. A., Whitehead A. & Høigaard, R. (2026). Team trust in professional women’s cycling teams. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 1-11. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/17479541251413089
Lopez-Gajardo, M. A., Garcia-Calvo, T., Gonzalez-Ponce, I., Diaz-Garcia, J., & Leo, F. M. (2023). Cohesion and collective efficacy as antecedents and team performance as an outcome of team resilience in team sports. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 18(6), 2239-2250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954122112919
Małczyński, P. (2022). The national team – shaping the nation’s representation in football. Review of Nationalities 11(1), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.2478/pn-2021-0011
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6 ed.). SAGE.
Martin, L., Bruner, M., Eys, M., & Spink, K. (2014). The social environment in sport: selected topics. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7(1), 87-105 https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2014.885553
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
McEwan, D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2014). Teamwork in sport: A theoretical and integrative review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7(1), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2014.932423
Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1167-1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326
Muñoz, A. R., Vega-Díaz, M., & González-García, H. (2023). Team cohesion profiles: influence on the development of mental skills and stress management. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 22(4), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2023.637
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022885
Romagna, J. (2021). Ritual in Sports: Transition and Transformation. Character and Transitions, 7, 25-38.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
Peters, K. (2020). Communication. In S. A. Haslam, K. Fransen, & F. Boen (Eds.), The New Psychology of Sport & Exercise. The Social Identity Approach (pp. 59-73). Sage.
Schei, G. S. (2023). Communication in elite team sports. [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Agder.
Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2017) Organizational Culture and Leadership. 5th Edition, Wiley.
Schwellnus, M., Soligard, T., Alonso, J. M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., Gabbett, T. J., Gleeson, M., Hägglund, M., Hutchinson, M. R., Van Rensburg, C. J., Meeusen, R., Orchard, J. W., Pluim, B. M., Raftery, M., Budgett, R. & Engebretsen, L. (2016). How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(17), 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572
Severt, J. B. & Estrada, A. X. (2015). On the function and structure of group cohesion. In E. Salas, W. B. Vessey, & A. X. Estrada (Eds.). Team cohesion: Advances in psychological theory, methods and practice (pp. 3-24). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Smith, B. (2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(1), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221
Sullivan, P., & Feltz, D. L. (2003). The preliminary development of the scale for effective Communication in Team Sports (SECTS). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(8), 1693-1715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01970.x
Sullivan, P. J., & Short, S. (2011). Further operationalization of intra‐team communication in sports: An updated version of the scale of effective communication in team sports (SECTS‐2). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 471-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00722.x
Vanhove, A. J., & Herian, M. N. (2015). Team cohesion and individual well-being: A conceptual analysis and relational framework. In E. Salas, W. B. Vessey, & A. X. Estrada (Eds.). Team cohesion: Advances in psychological theory, methods and practice (pp. 53-82). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Widerberg, K. (2001). Historien om et kvalitativt forskningsprosjekt. [The story of a qualitative research project]. Universitetsforlaget.
Woods, S., Dunne, S., Gallagher, P., & McNicholl, A. (2025). A systematic review of the factors associated with athlete burnout in team sports. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 70-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2148225
Younas, A., Fàbregues, S., Durante, A., & Ali, P. (2022). Providing English and native language quotes in qualitative research: A call to action. Nursing Open, 9(1), 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1115
