Beyond the Roar
Unravelling Audience Influence on Football Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/sjsep.v8i.148746Keywords:
Social facilitation, Audience effects, Choking, Football, COVID-19Abstract
According to social facilitation theory the presence of others affects individuals’ sporting performance. Although based on extensive research, the theory has been scarcely tested in real sporting environments. However, audience restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic offered rare opportunities to examine effects of spectators’ presence and absence on football players’ performances. To exploit these opportunities, we collected data on individual players’ performances in the English Premier League (47,541 player performances in matches from the start of the 2017/18 season to 23rd January 2022) and Swedish Allsvenskan (25,249 performances in the 2018-2021 seasons). Results show that players’ performances were significantly better in the presence than in the absence of an audience (and the effect of audience presence was moderated by playing home or away) in the Premier League, but not Allsvenskan. Conversely, the effect of audience presence was moderated by average attendance and average stadium filling in and the relative skill of the opponent in Allsvenskan, but not the Premier League. The differences in results could be at least partly due to contextual differences between the two leagues, particularly in the average quality of players (which is higher in the Premier League). The study extends understanding of the complex nature of social facilitation in football, and highlights needs for further rigorous investigation of the mechanisms underlying the detected effects.
References
Aarts, E., Verhage, M., Veenvliet, J. V., Dolan, C. V., & Van Der Sluis, S. (2014). A solution to dependency: Using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data. Nature Neuroscience, 17(4), pp. 491-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3648
Cefis, M., & Carpita, M. (2021). Football analytics: a Higher-Order PLS-SEM approach to evaluate players’ performance. In Book of the Short Papers SIS 2021 (pp. 508-513).
Blomqvist Mickelsson, T., & Shaw, V. (2020). Performance increments without audience: Paired data from mixed martial arts fighters during COVID-19. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiaticas, 15(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.18002/rama.v15i2.6294
Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), pp. 265-292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265
Boudreaux, C. J., Sanders, S. D., & Walia, B. (2017). A natural experiment to determine the crowd effect upon home court advantage. Journal of Sports Economics, 18(7), pp. 737-749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002515595842
Brechot, M., & Flepp, R. (2020). Dealing with randomness in match outcomes: How to rethink performance evaluation in European club football using expected goals. Journal of Sports Economics, 21(4), pp. 335-362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002519897962
Butler, J. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The trouble with friendly faces: Skilled performance with a supportive audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), pp. 1213-1230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1213
Böheim, R., Grübl, D., & Lackner, M. (2019). Choking under pressure – Evidence of the causal effect of audience size on performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 168, pp. 76-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.10.001
Cross, J. M., & Uhrig, R. (2020). Do fans impact sports outcomes? A COVID-19 natural experiment. Journal of Sports Economics, 24, pp. 3 - 27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/152700252211002
Davison, A.C. and Hinkley, D.V. (1997) Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press.
Decroos, T., & Davis, J. (2020). Valuing on-the-ball actions in soccer: a critical comparison of XT and VAEP. In Proceedings of the AAAI-20 Workshop on Artifical Intelligence in Team Sports (pp. 1-8). AI in Team Sports Organising Committee.
Delbianco, F., Fioravanti, F., & Tohmé, F. (2023). Home advantage and crowd attendance: Evidence from rugby during the Covid 19 pandemic. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 19(1), pp. 15-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2021-0044
Dube, S. K., & Tatz, S. J. (1991). Audience effects in tennis performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73(3), pp. 844-846. doi: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1991.73.3.844
Eichstaedt, K. E., Kovatch, K., & Maroof, D. A. (2013). A less conservative method to adjust for familywise error rate in neuropsychological research: The Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure. NeuroRehabilitation, 32(3), pp. 693-696. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-130893
Fazackerley, L. A., Gorman, A. D., Minett, G. M., Caia, J., & Kelly, V. G. (2022). The influence of absent crowds on National Rugby League match player statistics and running metrics. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 60, p 102163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102163
Ferraresi, M., & Gucciardi, G. (2021). Who chokes on a penalty kick? Social environment and individual performance during Covid-19 times. Economics Letters, 203, p 109868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109868 Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176521001452.
Ferraresi, M., & Gucciardi, G. (2023). Team performance and the perception of being observed: Experimental evidence from top-level professional football. German Economic Review, 24(1), pp. 1-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-2021-0104
FiveThirtyEight. (2022). Retrieved data from https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/soccer-predictions/?ex_cid=rrpromo
Forgas, J. P., Brennan, G., Howe, S., Kane, J. F., & Sweet, S. (1980). Audience effects on squash players' performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 111(1), pp. 41-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1980.9924271
Graydon, J., & Murphy, T. (1995). The effect of personality on social facilitation whilst performing a sports related task. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(2), pp. 265-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00052-8
Greve, J., van Meurs, E., & Strauss, B. (2023). Elite darts performance and the social influence of real crowds and simulated crowd noise. Scientific Reports, 13(1), p 12346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39378-x
Gueorguieva, R., & Krystal, J. H. (2004). Move over ANOVA: Progress in analyzing repeated-measures data andits reflection in papers published in the archives of general psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(3), pp. 310-317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.310
Heinrich, A., Müller, F., Stoll, O., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2021). Selection bias in social facilitation theory? Audience effects on elite biathletes' performance are gender-specific. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 55, p 101943. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101943
Hill, Y., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2021). Losing the home field advantage when playing behind closed doors during COVID-19: Change or chance? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, p 658452. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658452
Hoteit, R., Bou-Hamad, I., Hijazi S, Ayna, D., Romani M., & El Morr, C. (2024) A cross-sectional study of university students’ mental health and lifestyle practices amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE 19(4). e0302265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302265
Inan, T. (2020). The effect of crowd support on home-field advantage: Evidence from European football. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 8(3), pp. 0-0. doi: https://doi.org/10.29252/aassjournal.806
Jane, W.-J. (2022). Choking or excelling under pressure: Evidence of the causal effect of audience size on performance. Bulletin of Economic Research, 74(1), pp. 329-357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12307
Jiménez Sánchez, Á., Lavín, J. M., & Endara, F. C. (2021). Repercusiones de jugar sin público en la ventaja local, las decisiones arbitrales y en los componentes del juego. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 21(2), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.444811
Karlsson, J. (2020). What's in the game?: An exploratory design study about football statistics: Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2021). Ecological validity and “ecological validity”. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), pp. 466-471. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966791
Leitner, M. C., Daumann, F., Follert, F., & Richlan, F. (2023). The cauldron has cooled down: A systematic literature review on home advantage in football during the COVID-19 pandemic from a socio-economic and psychological perspective. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), pp. 605-633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00254-5
Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), pp. 1494-1502. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y
Manstead, A. S. R., & Semin, G. R. (1980). Social facilitation effects: Mere enhancement of dominant responses? British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(2), pp. 119-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1980.tb00937.x
Murayama, H., Okubo, R., & Tabuchi, T. (2021). Increase in social isolation during the covid-19 pandemic and its association with mental health: findings from the jacsis 2020 study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8238. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168238
Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 14(134), p 20170213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
Nakisa, N., & Rahbardar, M. G. (2021). Evaluating the probable effects of the COVID-19 epidemic detraining on athletes’ physiological traits and performance. Apunts Sports Medicine, 56(211), 100359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apunsm.2021.100359
Park, J., Cardwell, R., & Yu, H.-T. (2020). Specifying the random effect structure in linear mixed effect models for analyzing psycholinguistic data. Methodology, 16(2), pp. 92-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.2809
Pulis, M. (2023). Deep reinforcement learning for football player decision analysis (Master's thesis, University of Malta).
Paulus, P. B., & Cornelius, W. L. (1974). An analysis of gymnastic performance under conditions of practice and spectator observation. Research Quarterly. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 45(1), pp. 56-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1974.10615240
Pollard, R., & Gómez, M. A. (2014). Components of home advantage in 157 national soccer leagues worldwide. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(3), pp. 218-233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2014.888245
Pustejovsky, J. E. & Tipton, E. (2018). Small sample methods for cluster-robust variance estimation and hypothesis testing in fixed effects models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 36(4), 672-683. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2016.1247004
Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 387-401. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.387
Rathke, A. (2017). An examination of expected goals and shot efficiency in soccer. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 12(2), pp. 514-529. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3630130
Reade, J., Schreyer, D., & Singleton, C. (2020). Echoes: What happens when football is played behind closed doors? Available at SSRN 3630130 doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3630130
Russell, G. W. (1983). Crowd size and density in relation to athletic aggression and performance. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 11(1), pp. 9-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1983.11.1.9
Schielzeth, H., Dingemanse, N. J., Nakagawa, S., Westneat, D. F., Allegue, H., Teplitsky, C., . . . Araya-Ajoy, Y. G. (2020). Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), pp. 1141-1152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13434
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Strauss, B. (2002). Social facilitation in motor tasks: A review of research and theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(3), pp. 237-256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00019-X
Sumpter, D. (2021). Explaining Expected Threat (xT) in Football Analytics Using Markov Models: Its History, Part I. Retrieved from https://soccermatics.medium.com/explaining-expected-threat-cbc775d97935
Transfermakt. (2022). Retrieved data Accessed, 2022 from https://www.transfermarkt.com/
Twelve Analytics. (2022). Retrieved data from https://analytics.twelve.football/analytics.
Ugrinowitsch, C., Fellingham, G. W., & Ricard, M. D. (2004). Limitations of ordinary least squares models in analyzing repeated measures data. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36(12), pp. 2144-2148. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000147580.40591.75
Uziel, L. (2007). Individual differences in the social facilitation effect: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), pp. 579-601. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.008
Wallace, H. M., Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2005). Audience support and choking under pressure: A home disadvantage? Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(4), pp. 429-438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021666
Wunderlich, F., Seck, A., & Memmert, D. (2021). The influence of randomness on goals in football decreases over time. An empirical analysis of randomness involved in goal scoring in the English Premier League. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(20): pp. 2322-2337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1930685
Yeo, I., & Johnson, R. (2000). A New Family of Power Transformations to Improve Normality or Symmetry. Biometrika, 87(4), 954-959. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/87.4.954
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social Facilitation. Science, 149(3681), pp. 269-274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269
