Coping with external stressors in handball and football elite refereeing: The relationship with referee efficacy

Authors

  • Bjørn Tore Johansen University of Agder
  • Tommy Haugen University of Agder
  • Martin Kjeøen Erikstad University of Agder

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/sjsep.v4i1.129894

Keywords:

Referee Self-Efficacy Scale, Decision-Making, Social Pressure, Team Sport Referees

Abstract

This study investigated the association between referee efficacy and self-reported coping with external stressors among elite handball and football referees. The participants were 224 Norwegian elite referees of handball (n = 111, m age = 35.3 years, 13.5% females) and football (113, m age = 30.8 years, 8% females) who had been referees for an average of 14.4 years (sd = 7.77 years; min: 4, max: 37) and a referee at the present level for 6.8 years (sd = 6.20 years, min: 1, max: 32). Referee self-efficacy was measured using the Norwegian version of the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale. Self-reported coping with external stressors was measured using responses to statements related to the referee’s self-perceived decision-making process in the presence of several sources of external stressors. Referee self-efficacy was positively associated with coping with external stressors (b = .24 (se = .11), p = .021). Football referees reported higher levels of coping with external stressors (b = .28 (se = .08), p = .001) than handball referees, and the number of years of elite refereeing was positively related to coping with external stressors. The findings provide evidence of a positive relationship between referee efficacy and coping with external stressors when making decisions.

 

Keywords: Referee Self-Efficacy Scale, decision-making, social pressure, team sport referees

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Buraimo, B., & Maciaszczyk, M. (2012). Favoritism and referee bias in European soccer: evidence from the Spanish League and the UEFA Champions League. Contemporary Economic Policy, 30(3), 329–343. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00295.x

Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 245–265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16

Di Corrado, D., Pellarin, E., & Agostini, T. (2011). The phenomenon of social influence on the football pitch: Social pressure from the crowd on referees’ decisions. Annual Review of Psychology, 18, 33–36.

Diotaiuti, P., Falese, L., Mancone, S., & Purromuto, F. (2017). A structural model of self-efficacy in handball referees. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 811. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00811

Dohmen, T. J. (2008). The influence of social forces: evidence from the behavior of football referees. Economic Inquiry, 46, 411–424. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00112.x

Dohmen, T., & Sauermann, J. (2016). Referee bias. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(4), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12106

Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.

Erikstad, M. K., & Johansen, B. T. (2020). Referee bias in professional football: favoritism toward successful teams in potential penalty situations. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2, 19. doi:10.3389/fspor.2020.00019

Eskiyecek, C. G., Satici, O., Ozaltas, H. N., Savucu, Y., & Gul, M. (2019). An analysis on general self-efficacy beliefs of swimming referees in terms of demographic variables. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(5), 259–266. doi:10.5539/jel.v8n5p259

Goumas, C. (2014). Home advantage and referee bias in European football. European Journal of Sport Science, 14(sup1), S243–S249. doi:10.1080/17461391.2012.686062

Guillén, F., & Feltz, D. L. (2011). A conceptual model of referee efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 25. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00025

Guillén, F., Feltz, D., Gilson, T., & Dithurbide, L. (2018). Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale (REFS). Revista de Psicología del Deporte, ISSNe 1988-5636

Johansen, B. T., & Haugen, T. (2013). Anxiety level and decision-making among Norwegian top-class soccer referees. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(2), 215–226. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2013.773665

Johansen, B. T., Ommundsen, Y., & Haugen, T. (2018). Referee efficacy in the context of Norwegian soccer referees–a meaningful construct? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 38, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.013

Karaçam, A. & Pulur, A. (2017). Adaptation study of referee self-efficacy scale (REFS) to Turkish. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 11, 118–128. doi:10.13189/ujer.2017.050914

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

Labudek, S., Schweizer, G., Roth, A., Pizzera, A., Plessner, H., & Brand, R. (2019). REFSD: A German scale for assessing referee self-efficacy. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 26(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000256.

Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343

Lex, H., Pizzera, A., Kurtes, M., & Schack, T. (2014). Influence of players' vocalisations on football referees' decisions. European Journal of Sport Science, 15, 424 - 428. doi:10.1080/17461391.2014.962620

Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modelling. New York, Guilford Press.

MacMahon, C., Mascarenhas, D., Plessner, H., Pizzera, A., Oudejans, R., & Raab, M. (2015). Sports officials and officiating: Science and practice. New York, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Mascarenhas, D. R. D., Collins, D., & Mortimer, P. (2005), Elite refereeing performance: Developing a model for sport science support. The Sport Psychologist, 19, 364–379. doi:10.1123/tsp.19.4.364

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén

Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Guillén, F., & Dithurbide, L. (2012). Development of, and initial validity evidence for, the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale: A multi-study report. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34, 737–765. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.007

Norwegian Football Federation (2022). Norway. https://www.fotball.no

Plessner, H., Schweizer, G., Brand, R., & O’Hare, D. (2009). A multiple-cue learning approach as the basis for understanding and improving soccer referees’ decision making. Progress in Brain Research, 174, 151–158. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(09)01313-2

Samuel, R. D., Englert, C., Zhang, Q., & Basevitch, I. (2018). Hi ref, are you in control? Self-control, ego depletion, and performance in soccer referees. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 38, 167–175. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.009

Samuel, R. D., Tenenbaum, G., & Galily, Y. (2020). An integrated conceptual framework of decision-making in soccer refereeing. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(5), 738–760. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2020.1766539

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schweizer, G., Plessner, H., Kahlert, D., & Brand, R. (2011). A video-based training method for improving soccer referees’ intuitive decision-making skills. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 23(4), 429–442. doi:10.1080/10413200.2011.555346

Sors, F., Tomé Lourido, D., Parisi, V., Santoro, I., Galmonte, A., Agostini, T., & Murgia, M. (2019). Pressing crowd noise impairs the ability of anxious basketball referees to discriminate fouls. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2380. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02380

Sors, F., Grassi, M., Agostini, T., & Murgia, M. (2021). The sound of silence in association football: Home advantage and referee bias decrease in matches played without spectators. European Journal of Sport Science, 21(12), 1597–1605. doi:10.1080/17461391.2020.1845814

Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2004). Favoritism of agents—the case of referees' home bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(4), 461–469. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00013-8

Tenenbaum, G. (2003). Expert athletes: An integrated approach to decision making. In J.L. Starkes, K.A. Ericcson (Eds.), Expert performance in sport: Advances in research on sport expertise, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL (2003), 191-218.

Wang, L., Shi, Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Psychometric properties of the 10‐item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale in Chinese earthquake victims. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 64(5), 499-504. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02130.x

Wolfson, S., & Neave, N. (2007). Coping under pressure: Cognitive strategies for maintaining confidence among soccer referees. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 30, 232–247. ISSN 0162-7341

Downloads

Published

2022-09-27

How to Cite

Johansen, B. T., Haugen, T., & Kjeøen Erikstad, M. (2022). Coping with external stressors in handball and football elite refereeing: The relationship with referee efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.7146/sjsep.v4i1.129894

Issue

Section

Research section