Just Merit?
Authoritarian-Caring Parenting Style in China and the Challenge of Inequality and Hierarchy in Late Post-Revolutionary Societies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v8i2.140961Keywords:
parenting style, inequality, meritocracy, social hierarchy, elites, post-revolutionary societyAbstract
The radical transformation of Chinese society in the previous decades has greatly improved the material lives of most people, but has also led to skyrocketing levels of inequality, and has subjected Chinese youths to unprecedented levels of socio-economic competition. Helping them to succeed in this competitive world necessitates both care and control from their families. This is evident in their scholarly education, but also in the pressure they receive to marry early and well. Both the pressure on their education and on their path towards marriage is imposed on them in the name of support. While many analyses of this situation tie it predominantly to a Confucian ethos imbued into Chinese culture, this article suggests an alternative way to analyze this situation: The revolutionary opposition to inherited privilege paradoxically transformed higher education and marriage into ultra-competitive open markets. Rather than imputing a culturally bounded explanation for this phenomenon, I maintain that the authoritarian-caring parenting style observable in present-day China reflects a situation which finds parallels in other late post-revolutionary societies: the intensification of the educational pressure put on the haves in order to distinguish themselves from the have-nots.
References
Alpermann, B. (2011). Class, Citizenship and Individualization in China’s Modernization. ProtoSociology 28: 7-24. Buitron, N. and Steinmüller, H. (2020). The Ends of Egalitarianism. L’Homme 236: i-xxxvi. Bregnbæk, S. (2016). Fragile Elite. The Dilemmas of China’s Top University Students. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Fong, V. (2004). Only Hope. Coming of Age under China’s One-Child Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Fong, V. (2012). Gender Role Expectations and Chinese Mothers’ Aspirations for their Toddler Daughters’ Future Independence and Excellence. In A. Kipnis (ed.). Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche. Palgrave Macmillan. Hizi, G., R. LaFleur, Z. Shi and I.-M. Lu. (forthcoming). Disjuncture and Continuity in ‘Chinese Education’: The construction of “China” through the topic of "education” in the disciplines of anthropology and history. In C. Lammer, M. Lazzarotti, J.-B. Pettier, China Multiple (working title), forthcoming. Howlett, Z. (2021). Meritocracy and Its Discontents. Itacha, NY: Cornell University Press. Ji, Y. (2017). A Mosaic Temporality: New Dynamics of the Gender and Marriage System in Contemporary Urban China. Temporalités 26: 1-19. Kajanus, A. (2019). "Mutualistic vs. zero-sum modes of competition – a comparative study of children’ competitive motivations and behaviours in China." Social Anthropology 27(1): 67-83. Kipnis, A. (2006). "Suzhi: A Keyword Approach." The China Quaterly: 295-313. Kipnis, A. (2012a). Introduction: Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche. In A. Kipnis (ed.). Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche. Palgrave Macmillan. Kipnis, A. (2012b). Private Lessons and National Formations: National Hierarchy and the Individual Psyche in the Marketing of Chinese Educational Programs. In A. Kipnis (ed.). Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche. Palgrave Macmillan.
Liu, Y. 2013. “Meritocracy and the Gaokao: a survey study of higher education selection and socio-economic participation in East China.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 34(5-6): 868-887. Liu, Y-L. (2022). The Larger Meaning of China’s Crackdown on School Tutoring. The New Yorker (May 16th, 2022). Online: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/the-larger-meaning-of-chinas-crackdown-on-school-tutoring Markovits, D. (2019). The Meritocracy Trap. Penguin Books.
Pettier, J.-B. (2016). The Affective Scope: Entering China’s Urban Moral and Economic World through Its Emotional Disturbances. Anthropology of Consciousness 27(1): 75-96.
Pettier, J.-B. (2018). Morality and Desire. Sexuality, Gender and Inequality in Contemporary China. Autrepart 86: I-XVIII.
Pettier, J.-B. (2019). The reinvention of matchmakers. Ethnography of a Marriage Agency in Urban China. L’Homme 229: I–XXII.
Pettier, J.-B. (2020). Marrying the Perfect Child. Middle Class Norms and Intergenerational Arrangements in the Marriage Corners of Urban China. Ethnography 0(0): 1-22.
Pettier, J.-B. (2022a). ‘A Question of Bank Notes, Cars, and Houses!’ Matchmaking and the Moral Economy of Love in Urban China. Comparative Studies in Society and History 64(2): 510-536.
Pettier, J.-B. (2022b). The Paradoxical Agora. The Social and the Political in between the People in the Marriage Corners of China. Social Analysis 66(1): 21-43.
Pettier, J.-B. (2022c). ‘Feeling Under Pressure’: Realities of Sex, Love, and Dating in China,” “BEHIND THE SCENES.” Comparative Studies in Society and History website. Online: https://cssh.lsa.umich.edu/2022/05/26/feeling-under-pressure-realities-of-sex-love-and-dating-in-urban-china/ Sandel, M. (2021). The Tyranny of Merit. What’s Become of the Common Good? Penguin Books. Santos, G. and Harrell, S. (2017). Introduction. In G. Santos and S. Harrell (eds). Transforming patriarchy: Chinese families in the twenty-first century. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Schultz, R. and Stansbury, A. (2022). Socioeconomic Diversity of Economics PhDs. Peterson Institute for International Economics working paper 22 (4): 1-73. Shen 沈, Y. (2019). Shei zai ni jia: Zhongguo geti jiating de xuanze 谁在你家： 中国“个体家庭”的选择 (Who is your Family: The Choice of China’s “iFamilies”). Shanghai: Sanlian Bookstore Co. Slote, W. H. (1998). Walter H. Psychocultural Dynamics within the Confucian Family. In W. H. Slote and G. A. De Vos (eds.). Confucianism and the Family. New York: State University of New York Press. Su, Y. (2011). Collective Killings in Rural China during the Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 94-124. Taylor, R. (1989). Chinese Hierarchy in Comparative Perspective. The Journal of Asian Studies 48 (3): 490-511. Tu, W.-M. (1998). Confucius and Confucianism. In W. H. Slote and G. A. De Vos (eds.). Confucianism and the Family. New York: State University of New York Press. Wang, C., and S. Billioud. (2022). Reinventing Confucian Education in Contemporary China: New Ethnographic Explorations. China Perspectives 2022(2): 3-6. Wang, Q. and Ge, S. (2020). How One Obscure Word Captures Urban China’s Unhappiness. Anthropologist Xiang Biao explains why the academic concept of “involution” became a social media buzzword. Sixth Tone (Nov. 04, 2020). Online: https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1006391/how-one-obscure-word-captures-urban-chinas-unhappiness Xu, J. (2017). The Good Child. Moral Development in a Chinese Preschool. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Yan, Y. (2021). The Inverted Family. Post-Patriarchal Intergenerationality and Neo-Familism. In Y. Yan (ed), Chinese Families Upside Down. Intergenerational Dynamics and Neo-Familism in the Early 21st Century. Leiden, Biston: Brill.
Yang, K. (2018). How China’s Middle-Class Moms Became Their Kids’ ‘Agents’. Sixth Tone (Aug. 21, 2018). Online: https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1002799/how-chinas-middle-class-moms-became-their-kids-agents
You, Y. and Nussey, C. (2022). "The Resurgence of ignorance is women’ virtue
‘ women constructing ‘ of female education in China." Gender and Education: 1 16.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright belongs to the author and Qualitative Studies
