The Pitch as Meaning-directing Activity: Implications for Students and Education When Fast Pace and a Striving for Novelty Set the Scene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v6i2.127311Keywords:
entrepreneurial education, pragmatism, meaning, communication, valuesAbstract
The elevator pitch is part of a global tendency toward homogenization of entrepreneurial content in educational programs (Fletcher, 2018), and this article shows how the pitch is naturalized as a new language because it must be decoded in order to pass an innovation course for health students at a Danish University College. A core communicative component of the pitch is speed. Using pragmatism, the article shows how the pitch guides the meaning making of students and how the compressed time element reduces the space for reflection. Thus, the educational rhythm is set by values from the pitch and innovation. Further, the article problematizes how the pitching situation separates the pitched end product both from reflections on possible consequences of new solutions and from the dynamic forces that actually created the pitch.
References
Berglund & K. Verduijn (2018). Revitalizing Entrepreneurship Education: Adopting a Critical Approach in the Classroom. New York: Routledge.
Biesta, G. (1994). Pragmatism as a pedagogy of communicative action. Studies in Philosophy and Education 13, 273-290.
Biesta, G. & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and Educational Research. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Biesta, G. (2006). Of all affairs, communication is the most wonderful - The Communicative Turn in Dewey’s Democracy and Education. In: Hansen, D. T (Ed.). John Dewey and Our Educational Prospect: A Critical Engagement with Dewey's Democracy and Education (pp. 23-37). State University of New York Press.
Biesta, G. (2013). The Beautiful Risk of Education. London and New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis.
Biesta, G. (2020). Educational Research: An Unorthodox Introduction. Bloomsbury Academic.
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University – What the Student Does. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Brinkmann, S. (2006). John Dewey: En introduktion. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Bröckling, U. (2016). The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. London: SAGE.
Dewey, J. (1929/2013). Experience and Nature. Facsimile ed.: Read Books Ltd.
Dewey, J. (1934/2005). Art as Experience. Perigee. The Penguin Group.
Dewey, J. (1938/2013). Social inquiry. In: J. Dewey, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (pp. 487- 512). Read Books Ltd.
Dewey, J. & Bentley, F. A. (1949). Knowing and the Known. Boston: The Beacon Press. Eberle, T. S. & Maeder, C. (2016). Organizational ethnography. In: D. Silverman (4th ed.), Qualitative Research (pp. 121-136). SAGE.
Elkjaer, B. (2009). Pragmatism: A learning theory for the future. In: K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists . . . In Their Own Words (pp. 74-89). London and New York: Routledge.
Fayolle, A., Landström, H., Gartner, W. B. & Berglund, K. (2016). The institutionalization of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(7-8), 477-486.
Fayolle, A. (2018). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. In: A. Fayolle (Ed.), A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship Education (pp. 127-138). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Fletcher, D. (2018). Prologue: looking to the future: How can we further develop critical pedagogies in entrepreneurship education? In: K. Berglund & K. Verduijn (Eds.), Revitalizing Entrepreneurship Education: Adopting a Critical Approach in the Classroom (pp. xvii-xxiv). New York: Routledge.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. US: Basic Books.
Gibson, J. J. (1979/1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hjort, D. (2012). Introduction: Entrepreneurship in organizational contexts. In: D. Hjort (Ed.), Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship (pp. 1-18). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hodges, B. H. & Baron R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances: Perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22, 263-294.
Hodges, B. H. (2007). Values define fields: The intentional dynamics of driving, carrying, leading, negotiating, and conversing. Ecological Psychology, 19, 153-178.
Hodges, B. H. (2009). Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity and caring. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 628-652.
Hodges, B. H. (2017). Carrying, caring, and conversing: Constraints on the emergence of cooperation, conformity, and language. Interaction Studies, 18(1), 26–54.
Hytti, U. (2018). Epiloque – Critical entrepreneurship education: a form of resistance to McEducation. In: K. Berglund & K. Verduijn (Eds.), Revitalizing Entrepreneurship Education: Adopting a Critical Approach in the Classroom (pp. 228-234). New York: Routledge.
James, W. (1907/1995). Pragmatism. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
Lackéus, M. (2017). Does entrepreneurial education trigger more or less neoliberalism in education? Education + Training, 59 (6), 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-09- 2016-0151
Landström, H. (2005). Pioneers in Entrepreneurship and Small Business Research. New York, USA: Springer.
Lindbergh, J. & Schwartz, B. (2018). Entrepreneurship in societal change: students as reflecting entrepreneurs? In: K. Berglund & K. Verduijn (Eds.), Revitalizing Entrepreneurship Education: Adopting a critical approach in the classroom (pp. 43-61). New York: Routledge.
Lofland, J. (1995). Analytic Ethnography: Features, Failings, and Futures. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(1), 30-67.
Lofland, J., Snow, D. A., Anderson, L. & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Mead, G. H. (1934/1967). Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Nybye, N. (2020). An ambiguous entrepreneurship concept in an educational context of welfare-professions: Between obvious and hidden making of meaning, PhD dissertation, monograph (org. in Danish, 266 pages, defended June 2020), University of Southern Denmark.
Pittaway, L. & Edwards, C. (2012). Assessment: Examining practice in entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 54(8/9), 778-800.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-263.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Entrepreneurship as innovation. Chapter in: Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press (2nd edition translated from the 1926 German edition. 1st ed. originates from 1911). Chapter reprinted in: Swedberg, R. (Ed.) (2000), Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View (pp. 51-75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A Classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23.
Stacey, R. D. (2003). Complexity and Group Processes: A Radically Social Understanding of Individuals. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Steyaert, C. & Hjorth, D. (2003). New Movements in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Thrane, C., Blenker, P., Korsgaard, S. & Neergaard, H (2016). The promise of entrepreneurship education: Reconceptualizing the individual-opportunity nexus as a conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education. International Small Business Journal, 34(7), 905-92.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright belongs to the author and Qualitative Studies
