Borgernes til- og fravalg af daginstitutioner – et conjoint eksperiment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i1.142994Keywords:
institutionsvalg, conjoint eksperiment, daginstitutioner, normeringerAbstract
Borgeres til- og fravalg i velfærdsstaten har store konsekvenser for kvaliteten og indretningen af den offentlige service. Derfor er det også vigtigt for politikere og beslutningstagere at vide, hvilke faktorer der har indflydelse på borgernes til- og fravalg, og hvordan borgerne afvejer dem mod hinanden. Vi undersøger disse spørgsmål i en repræsentativ spørgeskemaundersøgelse, hvor vi beder respondenterne tage stilling til daginstitutionsvalg i et conjoint eksperiment. Resultaterne viser, at de inkluderede faktorer alle har meningsfulde effekter på sandsynligheden for valget af en daginstitution. Dog ser information om, hvorvidt daginstitutionen er offentlig eller privat/selvejende, ikke ud til at have nogen indflydelse. Desuden ser vi på, om en højere andel af uddannede pædagoger kan dæmpe den negative effekt af lave normeringer – det viser sig ikke at være tilfældet.
References
Auerbach, Adam Michael og Tariq Thachil (2018). How clients select brokers: competition and choice in India’s slums. American Political Science Review 112 (4): 775-791.
Baker, Michael, Jonathan Gruber og Kevin Milligan (2019). The long-run impacts of a universal child care program. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11 (3): 1-26.
Bansak, Kirk, Jens Hainmueller, Daniel J. Hopkins og Teppei Yamamoto (2022). Using conjoint experiments to analyze election outcomes: The essential role of the average marginal component effect. Political Analysis 31 (4): 500-518.
Beuermann, Diether W., Kirabo Jackson, Laia Navarro-Sola og Francisco Pardo (2023). What is a good school, and can parents tell? Evidence on the multidimensionality of school output. The Review of Economic Studies 90 (1): 65-101.
Brogaard, Lene og Ole Helby Petersen (2022). Privatization of public services: A systematic review of quality differences between public and private daycare providers. International Journal of Public Administration 45 (10): 794-806.
Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet (2020). Aftale mellem regeringen og Radikale Venstre, Socialistisk Folkeparti, Enhedslisten og Alternativet om minimumsnormeringer.
Chingos, Matthew M., Michael Henderson og Martin R. West (2012). Citizen perceptions of government service quality: Evidence from public schools. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7 (4): 411-445.
Christoffersen, Mogens Nygaard, Anna-Katharina Højen-Sørensen og Laura Laugesen (2014). Daginstitutionens betydning for børns udvikling. En forskningsoversigt (14:23). København: SFI.
Coe, Charles K. og James R. Brunet (2006). Organizational report cards: Significant impact or much ado about nothing? Public Administration Review 66 (1): 90-100.
Dafoe, Allan, Baobao Zhang og Devin Caughey (2018). Information equivalence in survey experiments. Political Analysis 26 (4): 399-416.
Datta Gupta, Nabanita og Marianne Simonsen (2010). Non-cognitive child outcomes and universal high quality child care. Journal of Public Economics 94 (1): 30-43.
Davidson, Adrienne. M., Samantha Burns, Delaine Hampton, Linda White og Michal Perlman (2021). Policy frameworks and parental choice: Using conjoint analysis to understand parental decision making for child care. Journal of Family Issues 43 (5): 1335-1363.
DEA (2021). Børn der skifter daginstitution (pp. 1-41). Tænketanken DEA.
Dickinson, Helen, Gemma Carey, Elenor Malbon, David Gilchrist, Satish Chand, Anne Kavanagh og Damon Alexander (2021). Should we change the way we think about market performance when it comes to quasi-markets? A new framework for evaluating public service markets. Public Administration Review 82 (5): 897-901.
Dietrichson, Jens, Ida Lykke Kristiansen og Bjørn A. Viinholt (2020). Universal preschool programs and long-term child outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Economic Surveys 34 (5): 1007-1043.
Dowding, Keith M. og Peter John (2012). Exits, voices and social investment: Citizens’ reaction to public services. Cambridge University Press.
Erickson, H. Holmes (2017). How do parents choose schools, and what schools do they choose? A literature review of private school choice programs in the United States. Journal of School Choice 11 (4): 491-506.
EVA (2010). Se med forældrenes øjne – Introduktion (pp. 1–36). Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut.
Fischer, Jesper Brask og Jon Kvist (2023). Frihed, lighed og privat velfærd. På vej mod en ny samfundsmodel. København: Gyldendal.
Ganter, Flavian (2023). Identification of preferences in forced-choice conjoint experiments: Reassessing the quantity of interest. Political Analysis 31 (1): 98-112.
Gray-Lobe, Guthrie, Parag A. Pathak og Christopher R. Walters (2023). The long-term effects of universal preschool in Boston. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 138 (1): 363-411.
Guul, Torbjørn Sejr, Ulrik Hvidman og Hans-Henrik Sievertsen (2021). Quasi-market competition in public service provision: User sorting and cream-skimming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (4): 740-755.
Hainmueller, Jens, Dominik Hangartner og Teppei Yamamoto (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (8): 2395-2400.
Hainmueller, Jens., Daniel J. Hopkins og Teppei Yamamoto (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis 22 (1): 1-30.
Hastings, Justine S. og Jeffrey Weinstein (2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (4): 1373-1414.
Hastings, Justine S., Richard Van Weelden og Jeffrey Weinstein (2007). Preferences, information, and parental choice behavior in public school choice. Working Paper No. 12995. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hirschman, Albert O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
Hirschman, Albert O. (1982). Shifting involvements: Private interest and public action. Princeton University Press.
Hjelmar, Ulf, Ole Helby Petersen og Karsten Vrangbæk (2013). Udlicitering af offentlige opgaver i Danmark – en forskningsoversigt over de hidtil dokumenterede effekter. Politica 45 (1): 60-79.
Hjortskov, Morten (2018). Borgernes tilfredshed med offentlig service – et spørgsmål om kvalitet og forventninger? Politica 50 (3): 326-344.
Hjortskov, Morten (2019). Citizen expectations and satisfaction over time: Findings from a large sample panel survey of public school parents in Denmark. The American Review of Public Administration 49 (3): 353-371.
Hood, Christopher og Ruth Dixon (2010). The political payoff from performance target systems: No-brainer or no-gainer? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (suppl_2): 281-298.
Horiuchi, Yusaku, Zachary Markovich og Teppei Yamamoto (2021). Does conjoint analysis mitigate social desirability bias? Political Analysis 30 (4): 535-549.
Hvidman, Ulrik (2019). Citizens’ evaluations of the public sector: Evidence from two large-scale experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (2): 255-267.
Hvidman, Ulrik og Simon Calmar Andersen (2016). Perceptions of public and private performance: Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Administration Review 76 (1): 111-120.
James, Oliver og Alice Moseley (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration 92 (2): 493-511.
James, Oliver, Asmus Leth Olsen, Donald P. Moynihan og Gregg G. Van Ryzin (2020). Behavioral public performance: How people make sense of government metrics. Cambridge University Press.
Jilke, Sebastian, Gregg G. Van Ryzin og Steven Van de Walle (2016). Responses to decline in marketized public services: An experimental evaluation of choice overload. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (3): 421-432.
Jilke, Sebastian, Wouter Van Dooren og Sabine Rys (2018). Discrimination and administrative burden in public service markets: does a public-private difference exist? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (3): 423-439.
John, Peter (2017). Finding exits and voices: Albert Hirschman’s contribution to the study of public services. International Public Management Journal 20 (3): 512-529.
Le Grand, Julian (1991). Quasi-markets and social policy. The Economic Journal 101 (408): 1256-1267.
Le Grand, Julian (2003). Motivation, agency, and public policy: Of knights and knaves, pawns and queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Le Grand, Julian (2007). The politics of choice and competition in public services. The Political Quarterly 78 (2): 207-213.
Lindeberg, Nanna Høygaard, Anne Toft Hansen, Kathrine Vixø, Dina Celia Madsen, Line B. Bjerre, Astrid Lundby og Melanie Anfinsen Lautrup (2023). Kvalitet i dagtilbud – national undersøgelse af kvalitet i pædagogiske læringsmiljøer og rammer i kommunale daginstitutioner og dagplejen for 0-2-årige børn. VIVE og EVA.
Lindholst, Andrej Christian og Morten Balle Hansen (2015). Befolkningens holdninger til markedsgørelse af den offentlige sektor: Erkendelsesinteresser og forklaringsmodeller i politologien. Politik 18 (4): 47-59.
Liu, Guoer og Yoki Shiraito (2023). Multiple hypothesis testing in conjoint analysis. Political Analysis 31 (3): 380-395.
Lowery, David (1998). Consumer sovereignty and quasi-market failure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 137-172.
Malhotra, Neil og Yotam Margalit (2014). Expectation setting and retrospective voting. The Journal of Politics 76 (4): 1000-1016.
Marvel, John D. (2015). Public opinion and public sector performance: Are individuals’ beliefs about performance evidence-based or the product of anti–public sector bias? International Public Management Journal 18 (2): 209-227.
Meier, Kenneth J., Austin P. Johnson og Seung-Ho An (2019). Perceptual bias and public programs: The case of the United States and hospital care. Public Administration Review 79 (6): 820-828.
Næsby, Torben (2019). Forældrenes holdning til kvalitet i dagtilbud: Projekt: Europæiske pejlemærker for kvalitet i dagtilbud (1-5 År). Delrapport for Danmark. UCN.
Olsen, Asmus Leth (2015). The numerical psychology of performance information: Implications for citizens, managers, and policymakers. Public Performance and Management Review 39 (1): 100-115.
Petersen, Ole Helby og Ulf Hjelmar (2014). Marketization of welfare services in Scandinavia: A review of Swedish and Danish experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 17 (4): 3-20.
Petersen, Ole Helby, Ulf Hjelmar og Karsten Vrangbæk (2018). Is contracting out of public services still the great panacea? A systematic review of studies on economic and quality effects from 2000 to 2014. Social Policy & Administration 52 (1): 130-157.
Pollitt, Christopher og Geert Bouckaert (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – Into the age of austerity, 4. udg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ritzau (2019). Demonstrerer for flere pædagoger: “Det giver mig ondt i maven”. dr.dk, 6. april.
Shleifer, Andrei (1998). State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (4): 133-150.
Tiebout, Charles M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416-424.
Tybjerg, Jonathan (2019). Her er udfordringerne for regeringens plan om minimums-normeringer. Zetland, 21. oktober.
Warren, Mark E. (2011). Voting with your feet: Exit-based empowerment in democratic theory. American Political Science Review 105 (4): 683-701.
Wilson, James Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it, 2. udg. New York: Basic Books.
