National understøttelse af offentligt-private partnerskaber (OPP): en komparativ analyse af 20 europæiske lande
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v47i4.131431Abstract
Artiklen præsenterer resultaterne af en komparativ analyse af den nationale understøttelse af offentlige-private partnerskaber (OPP) på tværs af 20 europæiske lande med varierende OPP-erfaring. Baseret på en gennemgang af litteraturen defineres tre elementer som centrale for national understøttelse af OPP: politisk opbakning, reguleringsmæssige rammer og institutionel understøttelse. I analysens første del gennemføres en sammenlignende analyse af den politiske, reguleringsmæssige og institutionelle understøttelse af OPP på tværs af de 20 lande. Det danner grundlag for at identificere ligheder og forskelle samt gruppere landene i forhold til national understøttelse af OPP. I analysens anden del gennemføres en eksplorativ analyse af sammenhængen mellem national understøttelse og den faktiske udbredelse af OPP opgjort som omfanget og størrelsen af OPP-projekter i landene.
References
Baldwin, Robert, Martin Cave og Martin Lodge (2011). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bonnet, Géraldine og Gilles Chomat (2013). France, pp. 42-54 i Koen Verhoest et al. (red.), Public Private Partnerships in Transport: Trends and Theory P3T3, 2013 Discussion Papers, Part I, Country Profiles. Brussels: COST.
Dewulf, Geert og Julieta Matos Castaño (2013). The Netherlands, pp. 55-68 i Koen Verhoest et al. (red.), Public Private Partnerships in Transport: Trends and Theory P3T3, 2013 Discussion Papers, Part I, Country Profiles. Brussels: COST.
European Investment Bank (2011). Study on PPP Legal & Financial Frameworks in the Mediterranean Partner Countries. Volume 3: Best Practices and Lessons Learned: Selected Experiences from Other Countries. Luxembourg: EIB.
European PPP Expertise Centre (2011, 2012, 2013). Market Update: Review of the European PPP Market. Luxembourg: EPEC.
Eurostat (2013). Government statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/government_finance_statistics/data/main_tables (september 2013).
Farrugia, Christine, Tim Reynolds og Ryan J. Orr (2008). Public-Private Partnership Agencies: A Global Perspective. Stanford, CA: Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects.
Flinders, Mathew (2005). The politics of public-private partnerships. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 7 (2): 215-239.
Greve, Carsten og Graeme A. Hodge (2007). Public-Private Partnerships: a comparative perspective on Victoria and Denmark, pp. 179-201 i Tom Christensen og Per Lægreid (red.), Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. Farnham: Ashgate.
Hammerschmid, Gerhard og Dieter J. Angerer (2005). Public private partnership between euphoria and disillusionment. Recent experiences from Austria and implications for countries in transformation. Romanian Journal of Political Sciences (01): 129-159.
Hodge, Graeme. A., Carsten Greve Anthony E. Boardman (red.). (2010). International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Jooste, Stephan F. og W. Richard Scott (2012). The public-private partnership enabling field: evidence from three cases. Administration and Society 44 (2): 149-182.
Klijn, Erik-Hans og Geert R. Teisman (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public-private partnership: an analysis of Dutch cases. Public money and Management 23 (3): 137-146.
Koch, Christian og Martine Buser (2006). Emerging metagovernance as an institutional framework for public private partnership networks in Denmark. International Journal of Project Management 24 (7): 548-556.
Leviakangas, Pekka (2013). Finland, pp. 218-231 i Koen Verhoest et al. (red.), Public Private Partnerships in Transport: Trends and Theory P3T3, 2013 Discussion Papers, Part I, Country Profiles. Brussels: COST.
Macario, Rosário, Rui Couchinho og Joana Ribeiro (2013). Portugal, pp. 142-162 i Koen Verhoest et al. (red.), Public Private Partnerships in Transport: Trends and Theory P3T3, 2013 Discussion Papers, Part I, Country Profiles. Brussels: COST.
Mahalingam, Ashwin og Venkata Santosh Kumar Delhi (2012). A contested organizational field perspective of the diffusion of public–private partnership regimes: evidence from India. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2 (3): 171-186.
Mahalingam, Ashwin, Ganesh A. Devkar og Satyanarayana N. Kalidindi (2011). A comparative analysis of public-private partnership (PPP) coordination agencies in India: What works and what doesn’t. Public Works Management and Policy 16 (4): 341-372.
Matos‐Castaño, Julieta, Ashwin Mahalingam og Geert Dewulf (2014). Unpacking the path-dependent process of institutional change for PPPs. Australian Journal of Public Administration 73 (1): 47-66.
McQuaid, Ronald W. og Walter Scherrer (2010). Changing reasons for public-private partnerships (PPPs). Public Money and Management 30 (1): 27-34.
Möpert, Fabian og Petr Witz (2013). Federal Republic of Germany, pp. 10-25 i Athena Roumboutsos, Sheila Farrell og Koen Verhoest (red.), Public Private Partnerships in Transport: Trends & Theory: 2014 Discussion Series: Country Profiles & Case Studies. Brussels: COST.
Mörth, Ulrika (2007). Public and private partnerships as dilemmas between efficiency and democratic accountability: the case of Galileo. Journal of European Integration 29 (5): 601-617.
OECD (2006). Review of the National Policy, Legislative and Institutional Environment Necessary for the Development of Municipal Public Private Partnership (PPPs) for Public Service Delivery and Local Development in the Europe and CIS Region. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2010). Dedicated Public Private Partnership Units: A survey of institutional and governance structure. Paris: OECD.
Petersen, Ole Helby (2007). Reguleringen af offentlig-private partnerskaber (OPP) i Danmark. Tidsskriftet Politik 10 (4): 39-51.
Petersen, Ole Helby (2010). Emerging meta-governance as a regulation framework for public-private partnerships: an examination of the European Union’s approach. International Public Management Review 11 (3): 1-23.
Petersen, Ole Helby (2011). Public-private partnerships as converging or diverging trends in public management? A comparative analysis of PPP policy and regulation in Denmark and Ireland. International Public Management Review 12 (2): 1-37.
Pollitt, Christoffer og Geert Bouckaert (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teisman, Geert R. og Erik‐Hans Klijn (2002). Partnership arrangements: governmental rhetoric or governance scheme? Public Administration Review 62 (2): 197-205.
Van den Hurk, Martin og Koen Verhoest (2013). Belgium, Flanders, pp. 18-41 i Koen Verhoest et al. (red.), Public Private Partnerships in Transport: Trends and Theory P3T3, 2013 Discussion Papers, Part I, Country Profiles. Brussels: COST.
Van den Hurk, Martin, Lena Brogaard, Veiko Lember, Ole Helby Petersen og Petr Witz (2015). National varieties of public-private partnerships (PPPs): a comparative analysis of PPP-supporting units in 19 European countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis (under udgivelse).
Verhoest, Koen, Petersen, Ole Helby, Walter Scherrer og Raden Murwantara Soecipto (2015). How do governments support the development of public private partnerships? Measuring and comparing PPP governmental support in 20 European countries. Transport Reviews 35 (2): 118-139.
VK-Regeringen (2004). Handlingsplan for Offentlig-Private Partnerskaber. Finansministeriet: København.
VK-regeringen (2011). Strategi til fremme af offentlig-privat samarbejde i Danmark. http://www.konkurrencestyrelsen.dk/fileadmin/webmasterfiles/udbud/Offentlig-privat_samarbejde__OPS_/Regeringens_OPS_strategi.pdf (18. marts 2013).
Weihe, Guri (2008). Ordering disorder – on the perplexities of the partnership literature. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67 (4): 430-442.
Witz, Petr (2013). Czech Republic, pp. 265-280 i Koen Verhoest et al. (red.), Public Private Partnerships in Transport: Trends and Theory P3T3, 2013 Discussion Papers, Part I, Country Profiles. Brussels: COST.
