Terrorbekæmpelse i Europa: EU’s rolle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v47i3.131451Resumé
Den Europæiske Union (EU) begyndte i september 2001 udviklingen af en tværinstitutionel og multifacetteret tilgang til terrorbekæmpelse. Denne proces er forløbet parallelt med bestræbelserne på at opbygge en strategisk sikkerhedsidentitet for EU. EU’s terrorbekæmpelse omfatter forskellige typer instrumenter og involverer deltagelse af adskillige institutioner og organer, der således samler en bred vifte af forskellige politikområder. Med udviklingen det seneste årti er EU blevet en relevant aktør i terrorbekæmpelsen i Europa. EU’s indsats i forhold til terrorbekæmpelse har endvidere en retslig dimension, hvis betydning er blevet forstærket af EU-Domstolen og Europa-Parlamentets indsats. Denne artikel kombinerer sociologisk institutionel teori og konstitutionalisme i en vurdering af EU’s rolle som europæisk terrorbekæmpelsesaktør. Artiklen inddrager de seneste 14 års politiske og juridiske udvikling og hævder, at EU’s forfatningsmæssige grundlag har afgørende betydning for terrorbekæmpelsens karakter og virkemåde. I den forstand adskiller EU’s terrrorbekæmpelsesindsats sig væsentligt fra andre internationale aktører, og det bringer nye elementer i spil i forhold til vurderingen af EU’s rolle i et bredere sikkerhedsperspektiv.
Referencer
Argomaniz, Javier (2009a). Post 9/11 institutionalisation of European Union counter-terrorism: emergence, acceleration and inertia’. European Security 18 (2), 151-172.
Argomaniz, Javier (2009b). When the EU is the ”norm-taker”: The Passenger Name Records Agreement and the EU’s internalization of US border security norms’. Journal of European Integration 1: 119-136.
Bache Ian (1998). The Politics of EU Regional Policy; Multi-level Governance or Flexible Gatekeeping?. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Bache, Ian og Matthew Flinders (red.) (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barros-Garcia, Xiana (2012). The external dimension of EU counter-terrorism: the challenges of the European Parliament in front of the European Court of Justice. European Security 21 (4): 518-536.
Beyer, Cornelia (2008). The European Union as a security policy actor: the case of counterterrorism. European Foreign Affairs Review 13: 293-315.
Bigo, Didier, Laurent Bonelli, Dario Chi og Christian Olsson (2007). Mapping the Field of the EU Internal Security Agencies, pp. 30 i Didier Bigo (red.), The Field of the EU Internal Security Agencies. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Bogdandy, Armin v. (2010) Founding principles of EU law: a theoretical and doctrinal sketch. European Law Journal 16 (2): 95-111.
Brattberg, Erik og Mark Rhinard (2012). The EU as a global counter-terrorism actor in the making. European Security 21 (4): 557-577.
Bretherton, Charlotte og John Vogler (2006). The European Union as a Global Actor. Oxon og New York: Routledge.
Buhari-Gulmez, Didem (2010). Stanford School on sociological institutionalism: a global cultural approach. International Political Sociology 4 (3): 253-270.
Caporaso, James (2007). The Three worlds of regional integration theory, pp. i Paolo Graziano og Maarten P. Vink (red.), Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Council of the European Union (2001). The Hague Programme: Strengthening Freedom, Security and Justice in The European Union. Official Journal C 53/01 of 3.3.2005.
Council of the European Union (2003). European Security Strategy. 15895/03, 16 Dec. 10.
Council of the European Union (2005a). The EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy. 14469/4/05 REV 4, 30 Nov. 2005
Council of the European Union (2005b). The European Union Strategy for Combating Radicalisation and Recruitment to Terrorism. Ref. 14781/1/05 REV 1, 24 Nov. 2005.
Council of the European Union (2010a). The Stockholm Programme: An open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens, Official Journal C 115 of 4.5.2010.
Council of the European Union (2010B). Draft Internal Security Strategy for the European Union: ‘Towards a European Security Model, Ref. 5842/2/10 REV 2 JAI 90, 8 Mar. 2010.
De Goede, Marieke (2012). The SWIFT Affair and the Global Politics of European Security. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (2): 214-230.
DiMaggio, Paul og Walter W. Powell (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147-160.
Edwards, Geoffrey og Cristopher O. Meyer (2008). Introduction: charting a contested transformation. Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (1): 1-25.
Europol (2014) TE-SAT 2013: EU Terrorism situation and Trend Report, The Hague: Europol.
Ferreira-Pereira, Laura og Bruno Oliveira Martins (red.) (2014). The EU’s Fight against Terrorism: The CFSP and Beyond. Oxon og New York: Routledge.
Finnemore, Martha (1996). Norms, culture and world politics: insights from sociology’s institutionalism. International Organization 50 (2): 325-347.
Fossum, Jon Erik og Agustin José Menéndez (2011). The Constitution’s Gift: A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Hall, Peter A. og Rosemary Taylor (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (4): 936-957.
Hillebrand, Claudia (2012). Counter-terrorism Networks in the European Union: Maintaining Democratic Legitimacy after 9/11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hillebrand, Claudia (2011). Guarding EU-wide counter-terrorism policing: the struggle for sound parliamentary scrutiny of Europol. Journal of Contemporary European Research 7 (4): 500-519.
Hooghe, Liesbet og Gary Marks (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Hyde-Price, Adrien (2006). Normative power Europe: a realist critique. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 217-234.
Kaunert, Christian, Sarah Léonard og Alex Mackenzie (2012). The social construction of an EU interest in counter-terrorism: US influence and internal struggles in the cases of the PNR and SWIFT. European Security 21 (4): 474-496.
MacKenzie, Alex (2012). The European Union’s increasing role in foreign policy counter-terrorism. Journal of Contemporary European Research 6 (2): 147-163.
Manners, Ian (2002). Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235-258.
Manners, Ian (2006). Normative power Europe reconsidered: beyond the crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 182-199.
March, James G. og Johan P. Olsen (1984). The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78 (3): 734-749.
March, James G. og Johan P. Olsen (2009). The logic of appropriateness. ARENA Working Papers WP 04/09.
Meyer, John W. og Brian Rowan (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340-363.
Newman, Abraham (2011). Transatlantic flight fights: multi-level governance, actor entrepreneurship and international anti-terrorism cooperation. Review of International Political Economy 18 (4): 481-505.
O’Neill, Maria (2011). The Evolving EU Counter-Terrorism Legal Framework. London and New York: Routledge.
Olsen, Johan. P. (2002). The many faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies 40(5): 921-952.
Peters, B. Guy (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The “New Institutionalism”. London og New York: Continuum.
Ripoll Servent, Ariadna og Alex MacKenzie (2012). The European Parliament as a ”norm taker”? EU-US relations after the SWIFT Agreement. European Foreign Affairs Review 17: 71–86.
Ripoll Servent, Ariadna og Alex MacKenzie (2011). Is the EP still a data protection champion? The case of SWIFT. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 12 (4): 390-406.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
LicensOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
