Ikkeidealteori og kravet om effektive remedier
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v58i1-2.165062Nøgleord:
politisk teori, ikkeidealteori, idealteori, demokratiske rettigheder, borgerpligtResumé
Artiklen undersøger ikkeidealteori som et særligt perspektiv i politisk teori og diskuterer, om aktører har en pligt til at vælge effektive midler i forsvaret af centrale rettigheder under ikkeideele forhold. Med udgangspunkt i teorien om militant demokrati introduceres distinktionen mellem ideal- og ikkeidealteori og de normative udfordringer, der opstår, når idealer ikke efterleves. Fokus er på fremadrettede ikkeideale teorier og deres krav om effektivitet, men artiklen diskuterer også, hvordan bagudrettede, deontologiske hensyn kan begrunde handlinger, selv når disse ikke er effektive. Der argumenteres for et afbalanceret princip, hvor effektive løsninger bør forfølges, indtil det ikke længere er muligt, hvorefter andre hensyn kan få forrang. Artiklen bidrager til en mere nuanceret forståelse af moralsk ansvar, legitime reaktionsformer og den rolle, effektivitetskrav spiller i ikkeideal politisk teori.
Referencer
Albertsen, Andreas og Lasse Nielsen (2026). Normativ politisk teori: metode og praksis. Politica 58 (1-2): 6-28.
Alexander, Larry og Michael Moore (2024). Deontological ethics, pp. i Edward N. Zalta og Uri Nodelman (red.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University.
Bellamy, Alex J. (2010). The responsibility to protect five years on. Ethics & International Affairs 24 (2): 143-169.
Brandt, Ingrid Helene (2026). En måde at mærke os i verden: nymaterialisme som politisk teori. Politica 58 (1-2): 118-137.
Brettschneider, Corey (2009). Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-government. Princeton University Press.
Buchanan, Allen (2013). The ethics of revolution and its implications for the ethics of intervention. Philosophy & Public Affairs 41 (4): 291-323.
Chahboun, Naima (2024a). Beyond strict compliance?: Unpacking the notion of nonideal theory as partial compliance theory, pp. 54-66 i Hilkje C. Hänel og Johanna M. Müller (red.), The Routledge Handbook of Non-Ideal Theory. Routledge.
Chahboun, Naima (2024b). The limits of nonideal duties: A partial vindication of fair shares. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy: 1-22.
Chambers, Simone (2023). Contemporary Democratic Theory. John Wiley & Sons.
Chenoweth, Erica (2021). Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know®. Oxford University Press.
Collard-Wexler, Simon (2006). Integration under anarchy: Neorealism and the European Union. European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 397-432.
Coons, Christian og Michael Weber (2016). The Ethics of Self-Defense. Oxford University Press.
Delmas, Candice (2018). A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. Oxford University Press.
Downs, William M. (2012). Political Extremism in Democracies: Combating Intolerance. Springer.
Drezner, Daniel W. (2011). Sanctions sometimes smart: Targeted sanctions in theory and practice. International studies review 13 (1): 96-108.
Enoch, David (2018). Against utopianism: Noncompliance and multiple agents. Philosophers’ Imprint 18 (16): 1-20.
Finlay, Christopher J. (2015). Terrorism and the Right to Resist: A Theory of Just Revolutionary War. Cambridge University Press.
Flanigan, Edmund Tweedy (2025). Why riot? An expressive theory of the justification of rioting. Free & Equal: A Journal of Ethics and Public Affairs 1 (1).
Flohr, Mikkel (2026). Historie, kritik og politik: bidrag til konstruktionen af en historisk materialistisk tilgang til politisk teori og idéhistorie. Politica 58 (1-2): 76-98.
Frowe, Helen (2014). Defensive Killing. Oxford University Press.
Gilabert, Pablo og Holly Lawford-Smith (2012). Political feasibility: A conceptual exploration. Political Studies 60 (4): 809-825.
Hansen, Allan Dreyer (2026). Politisk teori som dekonstruktion og hegemoniteori – Derrida og Laclau og Mouffe. Politica 58 (1-2): 138-163.
Hvid, Rasmus Møller (2026). Politisk teori som kritisk praksis: Om rationel rekonstruktion og Frankfurterskolen. Politica 58 (1-2): 99-117.
Invernizzi Accetti, Carlo og Ian Zuckerman (2017). What’s wrong with militant democracy? Political Studies 65 (1_suppl): 182-199.
Kelsen, Hans (2006). Verteidigung der Demokratie: Abhandlungen zur Demokratietheorie. Mohr Siebeck.
Kirshner, Alexander S (2014). A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combatting Political Extremism. Yale University Press.
Kochenov, Dimitry (2015). Biting intergovernmentalism: The case for the reinvention of article 259 TFEU to make it a viable rule of law enforcement tool. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 7 (2): 153-174.
Kremers, Philipp (2025). Non-ideal theory as ideology. Inquiry: 1-23.
Kymlicka, Will (2002). Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Loewenstein, Karl (1937a). Militant democracy and fundamental rights, I. American Political Science Review 31 (3): 417-432.
Loewenstein, Karl (1937b). Militant democracy and fundamental rights, II. American Political Science Review 31 (4): 638-658.
Malkopoulou, Anthoula og Alexander S. Kirshner (2019). Militant Democracy and Its Critics: Populism, Parties, Extremism. Edinburgh University Press.
Malkopoulou, Anthoula og Ludvig Norman (2018). Three models of democratic self-defence: Militant democracy and its alternatives. Political Studies 66 (2): 442-458.
McMahan, Jeff (2002). The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford University Press.
Miller, David (2011). Taking up the slack responsibility and justice in situations of partial compliance, pp. 230-245 i Carl Knight og Zofia Stemplowska (red.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
Mills, Charles W. (2005). “Ideal theory” as ideology. Hypatia 20 (3): 165-184.
Mouritsen, Per (2015). En plads i verden: det moderne medborgerskab. Gyldendal A/S.
Murphy, Liam B. (1998). Institutions and the demands of justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27 (4): 251-291.
Murphy, Liam B. (2003). Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Müller, Jan-Werner (2016). Protecting popular self-government from the people? New normative perspectives on militant democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 19: 249-265.
Niesen, Peter (2002). Anti-extremism, negative republicanism, civic society: Three paradigms for banning political parties. German Law Journal 3 (7): E1.
Olsen, Tore Vincents (2022a). Citizens’ actions against non-liberal-democratic parties. European Constitutional Law Review 18 (3): 466-487.
Olsen, Tore Vincents (2022b). Defending democracy politically. Acta Politica 57 (4): 798-817.
Olsen, Tore Vincents (2023). Why and how should the European Union defend its values? Res Publica 29 (1): 69-88.
Pasternak, Avia (2025). No Justice, No Peace: The Ethics of Violent Protests. Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John (1999a). The Law of Peoples – with The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John (1999b). A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rummens, Stefan og Koen Abts (2010). Defending democracy: The concentric containment of political extremism. Political Studies 58 (4): 649-665.
Scheppele, Kim Lane (2016). Enforcing the basic principles of EU law through systemic infringement procedures, pp. 105-132 i Carlos Closa og Dimitry Kochenov (red.), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press.
Schock, Kurt (2021). Consequences of civil disobedience, pp. 407-428 i William E. Scheuerman (red.), The Cambridge Companion to Civil Disobedience. Cambridge University Press.
Sen, Amartya (2009). The Idea of Justice. Penguin.
Sen, Amartya (2017). What do we want from a theory of justice?, pp. 27-50 i Alejandra Mancilla, Tom Campbell (red.), Theories of Justice. Routledge.
Simmons, A. John (2010). Ideal and nonideal theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs 38 (1): 5-36.
Sommer, Simone (2026). X-phi og begrebsanalyse i politisk teori. Political 58 (1-2): 53-75.
Statman, Daniel (2008). On the success condition for legitimate self-defense. Ethics 118 (4): 659-686.
Taggart, Paul og Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2016). Dealing with populists in government: some comparative conclusions. Democratization 23 (2): 345-365.
Theuns, Tom (2022). The need for an EU expulsion mechanism: Democratic backsliding and the failure of Article 7. Res Publica 28 (4): 693-713.
Thiel, Markus (2016). The “Militant Democracy” Principle In Modern Democracies. Routledge.
Tyssedal, Jens Jørund (2026). Intuisjoner i politisk teori: problemer og alternativer. Politica 58 (1-2): 29-52.
Tyszka, Franciszek og Tore Olsen (under udgivelse). The effect of civil disobedience in Hungary. European Political Science.
Valentini, Laura (2012). Ideal vs. non‐ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass 7 (9): 654-664.
Valentini, Laura (2021). The natural duty of justice in non-ideal circumstances: On the moral demands of institution building and reform. European Journal of Political Theory 20 (1): 45-66.
Vasanthakumar, Ashwini (2020). Recent debates on victims’ duties to resist their oppression. Philosophy Compass 15 (2): e12648.
Von Bogdandy, Armin, Carlino Antpöhler og Michael Ioannidis (2017). Protecting EU values: Reverse Solange and the rule of law framework, kapitel 12 i András Jakab og Dimitry Kochenov (red.), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance. Oxford Academic.
Zeller, Michael C. (2025). Pragmatic rather than principled – organisational bans in democracies. European Journal of Political Research: 1-30.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2026 PoliticaOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
