Jo større administrative byrder, desto mere bliver det, som myndighederne siger … Vi orker ikke andet. Eller?

Forfattere

  • Helle Ørsted Nielsen
  • Vibeke Lehmann Nielsen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i4.151662

Nøgleord:

administrative byrder, interaktion med offentlige myndigheder, borgeradfærd, social skævhed, flight, fight or befriend

Resumé

Artiklen undersøger sammenhængen mellem borgernes opfattelse af administrative byrder og deres adfærd i interaktioner med offentlige myndigheder. Traditionelt forventes stor byrdeopfattelse at føre til passiv adfærd (flight). Artiklen argumenterer dog for, at byrder også kan fremkalde følelsesbaserede reaktioner som fight eller befriend. Undersøgelsen viser, at større byrdeopfattelse fører til mere fight-reaktion og mindre passivitet. Det er kun for ressourcestærke borgere, at stor byrdeopfattelse fører til passivitet. Det er dog værd at bemærke, at flere ressourcer generelt medfører mindre byrdeopfattelse. Så udover at fight er en mere sandsynlig reaktion på store opfattede administrative byrder end flight, så peger resultaterne på en social skævhed i byrdeopfattelse og adfærd.

Referencer

Alford, John (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service delivery to co-production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Barnes, Carolyn Y. (2021). “It takes a while to get used to”: The costs of redeeming public benefits. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31(2): 295-310.

Bartlett, Susan, Nancy Burstein, William Hamilton, Ryan Kling og Margaret Andrews (2004). Food Stamp Program Access Study: Final Report. Report prepared by Abt Associates Inc. under a research contract from the Economic Research Service. Electronic Publications from the Food Assistance & Nutrition Research Program E-FAN-03-013-3.

Bashir, Mohsin og Muhammad Azfar Nisar (2020). Expectation vs reality: Political expediency and implementation of right to information laws. Public Administration Quarterly 44 (1): 3-30.

Becker, Gary S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Issues in The Economic Journal 75 (299): 493-517.

Bell, Elizabeth, Julian Christensen, Pamela Herd og Donald Moynihan (2023). Health in citizen-state interactions: How physical and mental health problems shape experiences of administrative burden and reduce take-up. Public Administration Review 83 (2): 385-400.

Bhargava, Saurabh og Dayanand Manoli (2015). Psychological frictions and the incomplete take‐up of social benefits: Evidence from an IRS field experiment. American Economic Review 105 (11): 1-41.

Bisgaard, Mette (2020). Who works the system? Investigating gender differences in client behavior in child visitation disputes. Aarhus: Forlaget Politica.

Bisgaard, Mette (2023). Dealing with bureaucracy: measuring citizens’ bureaucratic self-efficacy. International Review of Public Administration 28 (1): 45-63.

Braithwaite, Valerie (2003). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions”, pp. 15-39 i Valerie Braithwaite (red.), Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Braithwaite, Valerie (2009). Defiance in taxation and governance: Resisting and dismissing authority in a democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Brodkin, Evelyn Z. og Malay Majmundar (2010). Administrative exclusion: Organizations and the hidden costs of welfare claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 827-848.

Bruhn, Anders og Mats Ekström (2017). Towards a multi-level approach on frontline interactions in the public sector: Institutional transformations and the dynamics of real-time interactions. Social Policy & Administration 51: 195-215.

Bækgaard, Martin (2023). Borgernes oplevelse af administrative byrder i kontakten med det offentlige: Resultater og anbefalinger fra et forskningsprojekt. Administrativ Debat 2023 (2): 29-32.

Bækgaard, Martin og Jonas Krogh Madsen (2024). Anticipated administrative burdens: How proximity to upcoming compulsory meetings affect welfare recipients’ experiences of administrative burden. Public Administration 102 (2): 425-443.

Bækgaard, Martin og Tara Tankink (2022). Administrative burden: Untangling a bowl of conceptual spaghetti. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 5 (1): 16-21.

Christensen, Julian, Lene Aarøe, Martin Baekgaard, Pamela Herd og Donald P. Moynihan (2020). Human capital and administrative burden: The role of cognitive resources in citizen‐state interactions. Public Admin Review 80: 127-136.

Chudnovsky, Mariana og Rik Peeters (2021). The unequal distribution of administrative burden: A framework and an illustrative case study for understanding variation in people’s experience of burdens. Social Policy Administration 55 (4): 527-542.

Crosswell, Alexandra D. og Kimberly G. Lockwood (2020). Best practices for stress measurement: How to measure psychological stress in health research. Health Psychology Open 7 (2): 2055102920933072.

Deshpande, Manasi og Yue Li (2019). Who is screened out? Application costs and the targeting of disability programs. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11 (4): 213-248.

Döring, Matthias (2021). How-to bureaucracy: A concept of citizens’ administrative literacy. Administration & Society 53 (8): 1155-1177.

Ellis, Jane (2019). Corruption, social sciences and the law: Exploration across the discipline. New York: Routledge.

Etienne, Julien (2013). Ambiguity and relational signaling. Regulation & Governance 7: 30-47.

Goodsell, Charles T. (1981). The public encounter: Where state and citizen meet. Indiana University Press.

Goss, Kristin A., Carolyn Barnes og Deondra Rose (2019). Bringing organizations back in: Multilevel feedback effects on individual civic inclusion. Policy Stud Journal 47: 451-470.

Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan, Sebastian Jilke, Asmus L. Olsen og Lars Tummers (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review 77 (1): 45-56.

Halling, Aske og Martin Bækgaard (2024). Administrative burden in citizen-state interactions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 34 (2): 180-195.

Hansen, Kasper Møller (2012). Spørgeskemadesign, i Lotte Bøgh Andersen, Kasper Møller Hansen og Robert Klemmensen (red.), Metoder i statskundskab. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Hays, Ron D., Toshi Hayashi og Anita L. Stewart (1989). A five-item measure of socially desirable response set. Educational and Psychological Measurement 49: 629-636.

Herd, Pamela og Donald P. Moynihan (2019). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Hirschman, Albert O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Homonoff, Tatiana og Jason Somerville (2021). Program recertification costs: Evidence from SNAP. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 13 (4): 271-298.

Jakobsen, Morten og Rasmus Jensen (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal 18 (1): 3-30.

James, Oliver og Sebastian Jilke (2017). Citizen and users’ responses to public service failure: Experimentation about blame, exit, and voice, pp. 361-375 i Oliver James, Sebastian Jilke og Gregg G. Van Ryzin (red.), Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions. Cambridge Core.

Jilke, Sebastian og Lars Tummers (2018). Which clients are deserving of help? A theoretical model and experimental test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (2): 226-238.

Kagan, Robert A. og John T. Scholz (1984). The “criminology of the corporation” and regulatory enforcement strategies, i Keith Hawkins og John Thomas (red.), Enforcing regulation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Keiser, Lael R. og Susan Miller (2020). Does administrative burden influence public support for government programs? Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Admin Review 80: 137-150.

Kumlin, Staffan (2004). The personal and the political: How personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lipsky, Michael (2010). Street-level bureaucrats: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation

Lopoo, Leonard M., Colleen Heflin og Boskovski (2020). Testing behavioral interventions designed to improve on-time SNAP recertification. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration 3 (2).

Masood, Ayesha og Muhammad Azfar Nisar (2021). Administrative capital and citizens’ responses to administrative burden. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (1): 56-72.

Mettler, Suzanne og Joe Soss (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 55-73.

Mik-Meyer, Nanna (2017). The power of citizens and professionals in welfare encounters: The influence of bureaucracy, market and psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Moynihan, Donald P. og Joe Soss (2014). Policy feedback and the politics of administration. Public Administration Review 74 (3): 320-332.

Moynihan, Donald P., Pamela Herd og Hope Harvey (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 43-69.

Mullainathan, Sendhil og Eldar Shafir (2013). Scarcity: The true cost of not having enough. Penguin Books.

Murphy, Kristina, Lyn Hinds og Jenny Fleming (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society 18 (2): 136-155.

Nabatchi, Tina, Alessandro Sancino og Mariafrancesca Sicilia (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766-776.

Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann (2002). Dialogens pris. Uformelle spilleregler, ressourceasymmetri og forskelsbehandling i offentligt tilsyn. Aarhus: Forlaget Politica.

Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann (2005). Power in public implementation: A complex, but important part of power studies. Scandinavian Political Studies 28 (4): 349-375.

Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann (2007). Differential treatment and communicative interactions: Why the character of social interaction is important. Law & Policy 29 (2): 257-283.

Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann og Christine Parker (2009). Testing responsive regulation in regulatory enforcement. Regulation & Governance 3 (4): 376-399.

Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann og Helle Ørsted Nielsen (2018). At bygge en mur eller en bro: Borgernes adfærd i mødet med det offentlige. Politica 50 (3): 287-307.

Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, Helle Ørsted Nielsen og Mette Bisgaard (2021). Citizen reactions to bureaucratic encounters: Different ways of coping with public authorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (2): 381-398.

Nisar, Muhammad Azfar (2018) Overcoming resistance to resistance in public administration: Resistance strategies of marginalized publics in citizen-state interactions. Public Administration and Development 38 (1): 15-25.

Peeters, Rik (2020). The political economy of administrative burdens: A theoretical framework for analyzing the organizational origins of administrative burdens. Administration & Society 52 (4): 566-592.

Peeters, Rik, Anat Gofen og Oliver Meza (2020). Gaming the system: Responses to dissatisfaction with public services beyond exit and voice. Public Administration 98 (4): 824-839.

Sell, Aaron N. (2011). The recalibrational theory and violent anger. Aggression and Violent Behavior 16 (5): 381-389.

Shafir, Eldar (2014). Poverty and civil rights: A behavioral economics perspective. University of Illinois Law Review 205-230.

Soss, Joe (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review 93 (2): 363-380.

Soss, Joe og Sanford F. Schram (2007). A public transformed? Welfare reform and policy feedback. American Political Science Review 101 (1): 111-127.

Stax, Tobias Brøner (2005). Duetter fra anden sal på slottet: et interaktionelt perspektiv på samtaler mellem hjemløse og socialarbejdere. Ph.d.-afhandling, Sociologisk Institut, Københavns Universitet & Socialforskningsinstituttet.

Sunshine, Jason og Tom Tyler (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review 37 (3): 513-548.

Taylor, S.E., L.C. Klein, B.P. Lewis, T.L. Gruenewald, R.A.R. Gurung og J.A. Updegraff (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review 107 (3): 411-429.

Tummers, Lars, Victor Bekkers, Evelien Vink og Michael Musheno (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4): 1099-1126.

Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, George E. Marcus, Nicholas A. Valentino og Martial Foucault (2019), Fear, anger, and voting for the far right: Evidence from the November 13, 2015 Paris terror attacks. Political Psychology 40 (4): 679-704.

Yerramsetti, Srinivas, Suparna Soni og Nidhi Vij Mali (2022). Administrative burden as intermediate negative policy feedback: Explaining low-income migrant exodus amid the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Administrative Theory & Praxis 44 (4): 277-297.

Zeckhauser, Richard J. (2019). Strategic sorting: The role of ordeals in health care (June 28). HKS Working Paper No. RWP19-023.

Downloads

Publiceret

2024-11-29

Citation/Eksport

Nielsen, H. Ørsted, & Nielsen, V. L. (2024). Jo større administrative byrder, desto mere bliver det, som myndighederne siger … Vi orker ikke andet. Eller?. Politica, 56(4), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i4.151662