Ukraine og enden på den private sektors uskyld
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v55i1.135829Nøgleord:
privat sektor, sikkerhedspolitik, post-post kold krig, omdømmerisiko, UkraineResumé
Flere amerikanske tænketanke og aviser har beskrevet den nuværende sikkerhedspolitiske situation i Ukraine som en markering af en ny verdensorden – en post-post kold krig – hvor Rusland og Kina for alvor er trådt ind på scenen som stormagter, og hvor EU’s interne magtrelationer konsolideres og styrkes. Beskrivelsen af denne nye virkelighed af stormagtsrivalisering er dog kun en del af det billede, som tegner sig. For sagen er den, at vores idéer om, hvordan trusler skal bekæmpes, og hvem der har ansvaret for denne bekæmpelse, er fundamentalt forandret. Dagens geopolitik kæmpes nemlig ikke kun af stater, indenfor rammerne af diplomatiet og de militære institutioner, men også af private virksomheder. Denne artikel undersøger, hvad der kendetegner de danske virksomheders rolle i dansk og international sikkerhedspolitik og kommer med bud på, hvad denne udvikling betyder for vores forståelse af den kommende sikkerhedspolitiske æra.
Referencer
Angell, Norman (1911). The great illusion. Toronto: McClelland and Goodchild.
Babic, Milan, Jan Fichter og Eelke M. Heemskerk (2017). State versus corporations: Rethinking the power of business in international politics. The International Spectator 51 (4): 20-43.
Bartelson, Jens (2000). Three concepts of globalization. International Sociology 15 (2): 180-196.
Bauman, Zygmunt (1998). Globalisation: The human consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, Ulrich (1999). World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity.
Berling, Trine Villumsen og Karen Lund Petersen (2020). Designing resilience for security in the Nordic region: Implications for strategy, i Sebastian Larsson og Mark Rhinard (red.), Nordic societal security: Convergence and divergence. New York: Routledge.
Bremmer, Ian (2021). The technopolar moment: How big tech will shape the world order. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2021-10-19/ian-bremmer-big-tech-global-order
Cerny, Philip (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization 49 (4): 595-625.
Cerny, Philip (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition 32 (2): 251–74.
Cerny, Phillip G. og Alex Prichard (2017). The new anarchy: Globalisation and fragmentation in world politics. Journal of International Political Theory 13 (3): 378-394.
Deibert, Ronald J. og Louis W. Pauly (2019). Mutual entanglement and complex sovereignty in cyberspace, i Didier Bigo, Engin Isin og Evelyn Ruppert (red.), Data politics. London: Routledge.
Deloitte (2016). Reputation matters: Developing reputational resilience ahead of crisis. Deloitte Risk Advisory.
Gartzke, Eric (2007). The capitalist peace. American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 166-191.
Gilpin, Robert (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Haass, Richard N. (2022). Defining U.S. foreign policy in a post-post-cold war world. US Department of State, april. https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/p/rem/9632.htm
Hont, Istavan (2005). Jealousy of trade: International competition and the nation-state in historical perspective. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Kaldor, Mary (2005). Old wars, cold wars, new wars, and the war on terror. International Politics 42: 491-498.
Keohane, Robert (2009). The old IPE and the new. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1): 34-46.
Keohane, Robert og Joseph Nye (1977). Power and Interdependence. New York: Longman.
Pedersen, Ove Kaj (2011). Konkurrencestaten. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Petersen Karen Lund (2019). Three concepts of intelligence communication: Awareness, advice or co-production? Intelligence and National Security 34 (3): 317-328.
Politiken (2022). Ukraine søgte hjælp hos techgiganterne, da Vladimir Putin først gik til angreb. 3. juli.
Power, Michael, Tobias Scheytt, Kim Soin og Kerstin Sahlin (2009). Reputational risk as a logic of organizing in late modernity. Organization Studies 30 (2-3): 301-324.
Rice, Condoleezza og Amy Zegart (2018). 21st Century Risks. Harvard Business Review, May-June.
Sassen, Saskia (1996). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
Smith, Brad (2022). Defending Ukraine: Early lessons from the cyber war. Blog Post, https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2022/06/22/defending-ukraine-early-lessons-from-the-cyber-war/
Strange, Susan (1991) “Big Business and the State”, Millennium 20:2, pp. 245-50.
The Economist (2022). The war in Ukraine is going to change geopolitics profoundly. Briefing, March 5.
Vernon, Raymond. (1971) Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of US enterprises. London: Pinguin
Version2 (2018). Danske virksomheder griber hacker-angreb helt forkert an. 7. november.
World Economic Forum (2012). Global Risks 2012. WEF.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2023 PoliticaOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
