Misinformation, social status og latterliggørelse: en undersøgelse af danskeres spredning af og reaktioner på Covid-19 misinformation på Twitter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v54i2.132521Nøgleord:
Covid-19, humor, misinformation, social status, TwitterResumé
Hvordan interagerer danskere med misinformation på de sociale medier? Hvilke udsagn og argumenter anvender de til at sprede og imødegå misinformation? Vi undersøger digital misinformation under Covid-19-pandemien og analyserer, hvordan borgere henholdsvis spreder og afviser misinformation om mundbind på Twitter i Danmark. Vores undersøgelse viser, at omfanget af misinformation er begrænset, men at forkerte påstande i mindre grad imødegås gennem korrektion eller dialog. I stedet anvender brugere, der afviser misinformationen, ofte ironi og nedladende kommentarer til at distancere sig fra dem, der spreder misinformation, og hvis bekymringer således ikke bliver taget alvorligt. Resultaterne rejser spørgsmål om brugernes evner til at korrigere misinformation online og peger på vigtigheden af gruppetilhørsforhold og social status ikke blot i spredning, men også i afvisning af digital misinformation.
Referencer
Abidin, Crystal (2020). Meme factory cultures and content pivoting in Singapore and Malaysia during Covid-19. Misinformation Review 1 (3).
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (2014). Stigma management in international relations: Transgressive identities, norms, and order in international society. International Organization 68 (1): 143-176.
Allcott, Hunt og Matthew Gentzkow (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. The Journal of economic perspectives 31 (2): 211–235.
Altay, Sacha, Anne-Sophie Hacquin og Hugo Mercier (2020). Why do so few people share fake news? It hurts their reputation. New Media & Society.
BBC (2020). Coronavirus: “Murder threats” to telecoms engineers over 5G. 23. april. https: //www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-52395771 (26. august, 2020).
Berlingske (2020a). Sundhedsmyndighedernes vej fra afvisning af mundbind til krav om mundbind, 15. august. https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/sundhedsmyndighedernes-vej-fra-afvisning-af-mundbind-til-krav-om-mundbind (24. september, 2021).
Berlingske (2020b). Hvem bruger sociale medier? 4. februar. https://www.berlingske.dk/nyheder/hvem-bruger-sociale-medier (27. september 2021).
Bode, Leticia og Emily K. Vraga (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication 65 (4): 619–638.
Bode, Leticia og Emily K. Vraga (2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication 33 (9): 1131-1140.
Bode, Leticia, Emily K. Vraga og Melissa Tully (2020). Do the right thing: Tone may not affect correction of misinformation on social media. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review.
Borra, Erik og Bernhard Rieder (2014). Programmed method: Developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets. Aslib Journal of Information Management 66 (3): 262–278.
Caldarelli, Guido, Rocco de Nicola, Marinella Petrocchi, Manuel Pratelli og Fabio Saracco (2021). Flow of online misinformation during the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic in Italy. EPJ data science 10 (1): 34–34.
Cinelli, Matteo, Walter Quattrociocchi, Alessandro Galeazzi, Carlo Michele Valensise, Emanuele Brugnoli, Ana Lucia Schmidt, Paola Zola, Fabiana Zollo og Antonio Scala (2020). The Covid-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports 10 (1): 16598–16598.
Dharawat, Arkin, Ismini Lourentzou, Alex Morales og ChengXiang Zhai (2020). Drink bleach or do what now? Covid-HeRA: A dataset for risk-informed health decision making in the presence of COVID19 misinformation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08743 (24. september 2021).
Duarte, Natasha, Emma Llanso og Anna Loup (2017). Mixed messages? The limits of automated social media content analysis. 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. https://cdt.org/insights/mixed-messages-the-limits-of-automated-social-media-content-analysis/ (17. januar 2022).
Edgett, Sean (2017). Testimony of Sean J. Edgett, Acting General Counsel, Twitter, Inc. United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/10-31-17%20Edgett%20Testimony.pdf (17. januar 2022).
Epstein, Ziv, Adam J. Berinsky, Rocky Cole, Andrew Gully, Gordon Pennycook og David G. Rand (2021). Developing an accuracy-prompt toolkit to reduce Covid-19 misinformation online. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review.
Gallotti, Riccardo, Francesco Valle, Nicola Castaldo, Pierluigi Sacco og Manlio De Domenico (2020). Assessing the risks of ”infodemics” in response to Covid-19 epidemics. Nature Human Behaviour 4 (12): 1285–1293.
Gharpure, Radhika, Candis M. Hunter, Amy H. Schnall, Catherine E. Barrett, Amy E. Kirby, Jasen Kunz, Kirsten Berling, Jeffrey W. Mercante, Jennifer L. Murphy og Amanda G. Garcia‐Williams (2020). Knowledge and practices regarding safe household cleaning and disinfection for COVID‐19 prevention—United States, May 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6923e2-H.pdf (24. september 2021).
Goffman, Erving (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Grinberg, Nir, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, Briony Swire-Thompson og David Lazer (2019). Fake news on Twitter During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 363 (6425): 374–378.
Guess, Andrew, Jonathan Nagler og Joshua Tucker (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances 5 (1).
Guess, Andrew M., Brendan Nyhan og Jason Reifler (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US Election. Nature Human Behaviour 4 (5): 472–480.
Hannak, Aniko, Drew Margolin, Brian Keegan og Ingmar Weber (2014). Get back! You don’t know me like that: The social mediation of fact checking interventions in Twitter conversations. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014, 187–196.
Huang, Binxuan og Kathleen M. Carley (2020). Disinformation and misinformation on Twitter during the novel coronavirus outbreak. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04278 (24. september 2021).
Illumi (2021). 6 populære sociale medier. 30. juni. https://www.illumi.dk/viden/de-6-mest-populaere-sociale-medier/ (24. september 2021).
Jeong, Sarah (2016). The history of Twitter’s rules. Vice, 14. januar. https://www.vice.com/en/article/z43xw3/the-history-of-twitters-rules
Krippendorff, Klaus (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research 30 (3): 411–433.
Lison, Pierre og Jörg Tiedemann (2016). OpenSubtitles2016: Extracting large parallel corpora from movie and TV subtitles. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2016, 923–929.
Malhotra, Pranav (2020). A Relationship-Centered and Culturally Informed Approach to Studying Misinformation on Covid-19. Social Media+ Society 6 (3).
Margolin, Drew B., Aniko Hannak og Ingmar Weber (2018). Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? Political Communication 35 (2): 196–219.
Micallef, Nicholas, Bing He, Srijan Kumar, Mustaque Ahamad og Nasir Memon (2020). The role of the crowd in countering misinformation: A case study of the Covid-19 infodemic. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2020, 748–757.
Munger, Kevin (2017). Tweetment effects on the tweeted: Experimentally reducing racist harassment. Political Behavior 39 (3): 629–649.
Nyhan, Brendan og Jason Reifler (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 32 (2): 303-330.
OECD (2021). Trust in government (indicator). https://data.oecd.org/gga/trust-in-government.htm (24. september 2021)
Osmundsen, Mathias, Alexander Bor, Peter Bjerregaard Vahlstrup, Anja Bechmann og Michael Bang Petersen (2021). Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on twitter. The American Political Science Review 115 (3): 999–1015.
Persily, Nathaniel og Joshua A. Tucker (2021). Social media and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Petersen, Michael Bang, Mathias Osmundsen og Kevin Arceneaux (2020). The ”need for chaos” and motivations to share hostile political rumors. https://psyarxiv.com/6m4ts/ (17. januar 2022).
Pew Research Center (2018). Facts on news media & political polarization in Italy, Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/fact-sheet/news-media-and-political-attitudes-in-italy/ (24. september 2021).
Pulido, Christina M., Beatriz Villarejo-Carballido, Gisela Redondo-Sama og Aitor Gómez (2020). Covid-19 infodemic: More retweets for science-based information on coronavirus than for false information. International Sociology 35 (4): 377–392.
Shao, Chengcheng, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Onur Varol, Kai-Cheng Yang, Alessandro Flammini og Filippo Menczer (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications 9 (1): 4787–4879.
Sharma, Karishma, Sungyong Seo, Chuizheng Meng, Sirisha Rambhatla og Yan Liu (2020). Covid-19 on social media: Analyzing misinformation in Twitter conversations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12309 (24. september 2021).
Singh, Lisa, Shweta Bansal, Leticia Bode, Ceren Budak, Guangqing Chi, Kornraphop Kawintiranon, Colton Padden, Rebecca Vanarsdall, Emily Vraga og Yanchen Wang (2020). A first look at Covid-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter.https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13907 (24. september 2021).
Snowball (n.d.). String processing language for creating stemming algorithms. https://snowballstem.org/ (24. september 2021).
Statsministeriet (2020a). Pressemøde den 15. august 2020. https://www.stm.dk/presse/pressemoedearkiv/pressemoede-den-15-august-2020 (24. september 2021).
Statsministeriet (2020b). Pressemøde den 7. december 2020. https://www.stm.dk/presse/pressemoedearkiv/pressemoede-den-7-december-2020 (24. september 2021).
TjekDet (2022). Arbejdsproces og etisk regelsæt – sådan faktatjekker vi. https://www.tjekdet.dk/arbejdsproces-og-etisk-regelsaet#saadanfaktatjekkervi (18. januar 2022)
Tv2 (2020). Kvinde nægter at bære mundbind, og hun er langtfra den eneste. 8. oktober. https://nyheder.tv2.dk/lokalt/2020-10-08-kvinde-naegter-at-baere-mundbind-og-hun-er-langtfra-den-eneste (24. september 2021).
Tv2 Lorry (2021). Vi er vrede, og vi er trætte, og vi er ved at blive sindssyge. Hvor er den virus? 10. januar. https://www.tv2lorry.dk/tv2dk/vi-er-vrede-og-vi-er-traette-og-vi-er-ved-at-blive-sindssyge-hvor-er-den-virus (24. september 2021).
Twitter (2020). An update on our security incident. 28. juli. Twitter Blog https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/an-update-on-our-security-incident.html (24. september 2021)
van der Meer, Toni GLA og Yan Jin (2020). Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: The effects of corrective information type and source. Health Communication 35 (5): 560-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573295
Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy og Sinan Aral (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science (6380): 1146–1151.
Vraga, Emily K. og Leticia Bode (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication 39 (5): 621–645.
Vraga, Emily K., Sojung C. Kim og John Cook (2019). Testing logic-based and humor-based corrections for science, health, and political misinformation on social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 63 (3): 393-414.
Vraga, Emily K., Sojung C. Kim, John Cook og Leticia Bode (2020). Testing the effectiveness of correction placement and type on Instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics 25 (4): 632-652.
WHO (2020). Director-General’s remarks at the media briefing on 2019 novel coronavirus on 8th of February 2020. Geneve: World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/director-general-s-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-2019-novel-coronavirus---8-february-2020 (24. september 2021).
Wojcik, Stefan og Adam Hughes (2019). Sizing up Twitter users. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/ (24. september 2021).
Wood, Thomas og Ethan Porter (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior 41 (1): 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y
Downloads
Yderligere filer
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
LicensOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
