Stereotyper, sted og sprog
En tematisk analyse af danskeres beskrivelser af fynboer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ordogsag.v45.163165Nøgleord:
Dialekt, Fynsk, Tematisk analyse, Sociolingvistik, Indeksikalitet, Unges sprogbrugResumé
Denne artikel undersøger stereotype forestillinger om fynboer og fynsk dialekt blandt 282 danske respondenter. Gennem en tematisk analyse af kvalitative spørgeskemasvar identificerer vi mønstre i, hvordan fynboer og deres sprog opfattes. Analysen peger på fem fremtrædende stereotype forestillinger om fynboen: ’den humoristiske fynbo’, ’fynboen som svær at tage seriøst’, ’fynboen som knoldesparker’, ’fynboen der har det bedst hjemme’ samt en stereotyp inspireret af kendte og/eller fiktionelle fynboer (eksempelvis ’Polle fra Snave’). Analysen viser, at fynsk dialekt ofte beskrives som syngende og med lange vokaler. Derudover viser analysen, at der er nuancer i hvilke stereotyper der trives på og uden for Fyn; fynboerne peger ofte på fynboer som hyggelige og humoristiske, mens sjællandske og jyske respondenter bidrager til de mere negative stereotyper.
Referencer
Abbasian, F. & Sharifi, S. 2013. The relationship between culture shock and sociolinguistic shock: A case study of non-Persian speaking learners. Open Journal of Social Science Research 1(6): 154-59. DOI:10.12966/ojssr.09.07.2013.
Arboe, T. & Hansen, I. S. 2009. Århusiansk – byens sprog før og nu. Borchmann, S., Iversen, S., Kunøe, M. & Stounbjerg, P. (red.) Århushistorier, 71-86. Aarhus: Det Humanistiske Fakultet.
Boas, K. 2025. Funic: An enregistered language variety in the central part of Denmark. Scandinavian Studies in Language 16(1): 1-39. DOI:10.7146/sss.v16i1.161693 Braun, V. & Clarke, V. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77-101. DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. 2022. Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Bucholtz, M. 2004. Styles and stereotypes. The linguistic negotiation of identity among Laotian American youth. Pragmatics 14(2-3): 127-147. DOI: 10.1075/prag.14.2-3.02buc.
Bøegh, K. F., Schoonderbeek Hansen, I., & Svendsen, M.M.M. 2023. Perceptuel dialektologi og sproglig variation i Danmark: En århusiansk tegn-et-kort-undersøgelse. Nordlyd 47(2): 55-76. DOI: 10.7557/12.7083.
Carmichael, K. 2023. Locating place in variationist sociolinguistics: Making the case for ethnographically informed multidimensional place orientation metrics. Journal of Linguistic Geography 11(2): 65-77. DOI: 10.1017/jlg.2023.2. r.
D’Onofrio, A. 2021. Sociolinguistic signs as cognitive representations. I Hall-Lew, L., Moore, E. & Podesva, R. J. (red.): Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eckert, P. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87-100. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828
Gadanidis, T., Kiss, A., Konnelly, L., Pabst, K., Schlegl, L., Umbal, P. & Tagliamonte, S.A. 2023. Integrating qualitative and quantitative analyses of stance: A case study of English that/zero variation. Language in Society 52(1): 27-50. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404521000671.
Hay, J. & Drager, K. 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48(4): 865-892. DOI: 10.1515/ling.2010.027.
Hilton, J. L., & Hippel, W. V. 1996. Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology 47: 237-271. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237
Hurring, Gia, Hay, Jen, Drager, Katie, Podlubny, Ryan, Manhire, Laura & Ellis, Alix. 2022. Social Priming in Speech Perception: Revisiting Kangaroo/Kiwi Priming in New Zealand English. Brain Sciences 12(6):684. DOI:10.3390/brainsci12060684.
Johnstone, B. & Kiesling, S. F. 2008. Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1):5-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00351.x.
Kristiansen, T. 2009. The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Lingustica Hafniensia 41(1): 167-192. DOI: 10.1080/03740460903364219.
Køhler Mortensen, K. 2020. Northern Jutland: Local positioning and global orientation. I Maegaard, M., Monka, M. Køhler Mortensen, K. & Stæhr, A. C. (red.): Standardization as Sociolinguistic Change. A Transversal Study of Three Traditional Dialect Areas: 80-113. New York: Routledge.
Ladegaard, H. J. (2002). Sprog skaber folk: sprogholdninger og stereotyper i Danmark. Sprogforum. Tidsskrift for Sprog- og kulturpædagogik 8(22): 52-57. https://doi.org/10.7146/spr.v8i22.112404.
Levon E. 2014. Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 43(5): 539-566. DOI:10.1017/S0047404514000554.
Maegaard, M. 2010. Linguistic practice and stereotypes among Copenhagen adolescents. I P. Quist & B. A. Svendsen (red.) Multilingual urban Scandinavia: New linguistic practices: 189-206. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Montgomery, C., & Moore, E. 2018. Evaluating S(c)illy voices: The effects of salience, stereotypes, and co-present language variables on real-time reactions to regional speech. Language 94(3): 629-661. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0038
Niedzielski, N. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 62-85. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X99018001005.
Oakes, P.J. & Turner J, C. 1990. Is limited information processing capacity the cause of social stereotyping? I Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (red.): European Review of Social Psychology: 1112-1135. London: Wiley
Pabst, K. 2024. A County Boy you’ll quickly know’: On the intersection of local affiliation and gender presentation in Southern Aroostook County. Præsenteret ved ICLaVe12, University of Vienna.
Pharao, N., Maegaard, M., Møller, J.S. & Kristiansen, T. 2014. “Indexical meanings of [S+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts”. Language in Society 43 (1): 1.31. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404513000857.
Preston, D.R. 2004. Language with an attitude. I The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (red.): 39-66. DOI: 10.1002/9780470756591.ch2
Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialects of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication (23): 193-229.
Stæhr, A. C. & Larsen, A. 2020. Bornholm: The terminal stage of dedialectalization. I Maegaard, M., Monka, M. Køhler Mortensen, K. & Stæhr, A. C. (red.): Standardization as Sociolinguistic Change. A Transversal Study of Three Traditional Dialect Areas: 114-44. New York: Routledge.
Willig, C. 2017. Interpretation in qualitative research. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. C. Willig, C. & Stainton, C. R. (red.), 2. udgave: 276-90. London: SAGE.
Wittenbrink B. 1994. Stereotypes as social concepts in a knowledge-based approach to categorization. Ph.d-afhandling. University of Michigan.
Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2025 Kirstine Boas, Mathilde Mosdal Andreasen, Marie Elisabet Holm Harbsmeier, Ellen Marie Ulrik Hansen
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse (by).
Artikler i Ord & Sag nummer 1-42 må læses, downloades og linkes til.
I Ord & Sag nummer 43 og frem er artiklerne udgivet under en CC-BY-licens.
