Expanded choreography and history writing in the flesh
Independent dance artists claiming their past
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nts.v33i1.131992Keywords:
Ephemerality and dance history writing, expanded choreography, dance theory, archival theory, participatory archivingAbstract
This paper looks at artist driven initiatives in Denmark since the 1980s that have aimed to document, collect, and archive the remains of an art form otherwise
deemed short-lived, ephemeral, and marginal to the history of the performing arts. Approached through recent dance history as well as dance and archival
theory, it unpacks how dance artists have taken on the task to create platforms to allow for insights from the past to inform the present as well as the future.
The discussion engages two examples, each of which belongs to a different archival paradigm, before investigating in more detail a still ongoing dance
archival/(hi)story project initiated in 2018 by a group of choreographers and dancers whose concept of their craft is informed by an expanded notion of
choreography. Facilitating platforms for transgenerational exchanges between dance artists, the project named Danish Dance Stories explores participatory
formats for the sharing of tangible remains, documents, stories about dance and the lives of dancers as well as the corporeal transmission of choreographic
material, training approaches, artistic philosophies, and proposals. It will be argued that in the project’s entanglement of the ephemeral with the remains,
the stories and the embodied traces, dance history writing becomes an artistic project in itself.
References
Allsopp, Ric and Lepecki, André. 2008. “On Choreography”. Performance Research 13:1. 1-6.
Banes, Sally. 1993. Democracy’s Body: Judson Dance Theatre, 1962-1964. Durham: Duke University Press.
Banes, Sally. 1998. Dancing Women: Female Bodies Onstage. New York: Routledge.
Barthes, Roland. 1968. ”The Death of the Author”. Aspen. The Magazine in a Box 5 + 6. Ubu Web Papers http://www.tbook.constantvzw.org/wp-content/death_authorbarthes.pdf
Bishop, Claire. 2004. “Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics”. October. No. 110. 51-79.
Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Paris: Les Presses du Réel.
Alice Chauchat and Mette Ingvartsen (Eds.). 2009. Everybodys Group Self Interviews. Everybody’s Publications.
Clarke, Paul, Jones, Simon, Kaye, Nick and Lindsley, Johanna (eds.). 2018. Artists in the Archive. Creative and Curatorial Engagements with Documents of Art and Performance. London: Routledge.
Cook, Terry. 2013. “Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms”. Archival Science (2013) 13: 95 – 120.
Derrida, Jacques. 1996. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, trans. Eric Prenowitz. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Eco, Umberto. 1962. The Open Work. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Featherstone, Mike. 2006. “Archive”. Theory, Culture and Society. 23:2-3.
Foster, Susan. 1986. Reading Dancing. Bodies and Subjects in Contemporary American Dance. Oakland. University of California Press.
Foster, Susan. 1996. Corporealities. Dancing Knowledge, Culture and Power. New York: Routledge.
Franko, Mark. 1993. Dance as Text. Ideologies of the Baroque Body. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Franko, Mark. 1995. Dancing Modernism / Performing Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Franko, Mark. 2019. “Introduction: The Power of Recall in a Post-Ephemeral Era”. Franko, Mark (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Dance and Reenactment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1-15.
Franko, Mark. 2019. Choreographing Discourses. A Mark Franko Reader. New York: Routledge.
Hallar, Marianne. 1989. “The Royal Theatre Libray and Archives”. Nordic Theatre Studies. Vol. 2/3. 188-193.
Hedstrom, Margaret. 2002. “Archives, Memory and Interfaces with the Past. Archival Science: 21-43, 2002.
Hildebrandt, Antje. 2016. “The End of Choreography”. Choreographic Practices. 7:1. 71-118.
Ingvartsen, Mette. 2016. Expanded Choreography: Shifting the agency of movement in The Artificial Nature Project and 69 Positions. Malmø: Lund University.
Inpex (ed.), Swedish Dance History, vol. 1-4. Stockholm: Inpex, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. https://theswedishdancehistory.wordpress.com/2012/10/
Johnston, Jill. 1998 (1968). Marmalade Me. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press
Jones, Amelia. 2013. ”Unpredictable Temporalities. The Body and Performance in (Art) History”. Borggreen, Gunhild and Gade, Rune (eds.). Performing Archives/ Archives of Performance. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. 53-72.
Jones, Amelia.2015. ”Material Traces: Performiativity, Artistic ”Work” and New Concepts of Agency”. TDR. 59:4. 18-35.
Jones, Sarah, Abbott, Daisy and Ross, Seamus. 2009. ”Redefining the performing arts archive”. Archival Science Vol. 9. 165-171.
Jowitt, Deborah. 1989. Time and the Dancing Image. Oakland: University of California Press.
Kaye, Nick. 2018. “Liveness and the Entanglement of Things”. In: Clarke, Paul, Jones, Simon, Kaye, Nick and Lindsley, Johanna (eds.). Artists in the Archive. Creative and Curatorial Engagements with Documents of Art and Performance. London: Routledge. 25-58.
Krauss, Rosalind. 1979. “Sculpture in the Expanded Field”. October. Vol 8. Summer, 1979. 33-40.
Lepecki, André. 2010. “The Body as Archive. Will to Re-enact and Afterlives of Dances”. Dance Research Journal. 42:2 (2010). 2848.
Manoff, Marlene. 2004. ”Theories of the Archive from Across the Disciplines”. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, vol. 4, No. 1 (2004): 9 – 25.
Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves. Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Martin, Randy. 2019. “Foreword”. Franko, Mark with Alessandra Nicifero. Choreographing Discourses. New York: Routledge. x -xiv
Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked. The Politics of Performance. Hove: Psychology Press.
Reading, A. 2011. “Memory and Digital Media: Six Dynamics of the Globital Memory Field.” In On Media Memory: Collective Memory in a New Media Age, edited by M. Neiger, O. Meyers, E. Zandberg, 241–252. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Reason, Matthew. 2003. “Archive or Memory. The Detritus of Live Performance.” NTQ. 19:1. 82-89.
Reason, Matthew. 2006. Documentation, Disappearance and the Representation of Live Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sabisch, Petra. 2013. ”For a Topology of Practices. A Study on the Situation of Contemporary and Experimental Dance, Choreography and Performance Art in Europe (1990-2013)”. Independent Theatre in Contemporary Europe, edited by Brauneck, Manfred and ITI Germany. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. 43-184.
Shilton, Katie and Srinivasan, Ranesh. 2007. “Counterpoint. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections”. Archivaria. 63. 87-101.
Vedel, Karen. 2000. Dokument om dans. Den første danseredegørelse. Gerlev: Bavnebanke
Vedel, Karen. 2005. En anden Dans. Moderne scenedans i Danmark 1900-1975. København: Multivers.
Vedel, Karen. 2011. “Strategically Nordic. Articulating the Internal Logic of the Field”. Karen Vedel (ed.). Dance and the Formation of Norden. Oslo: Tapir Akademisk Forlag. 105-131.
Vedel, Karen. 2014. “Strategic Mobility and Wayfinding Artists. Performing the Region”. Karen Vedel and Petri Hoppu (eds.). Nordic Dance Spaces. Imagining and Practicing a Region. Ashgate. 49-78.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright belongs to the authors and Nordic Theatre Studies. Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in the journal but only for non-commercial purposes. Users are allowed to link to the files, download the files, distribute the files on a local network (preferably by links), upload the files to local repositories if their institutions require them to do so, but not republish the files without proper agreements with the journal and the author.
