Spectatorship, Politics and the Rules of Participation
Re-discovering the Audience in Contemporary Lithuanian Theatre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nts.v30i2.112954Keywords:
Audience, Participatory turn, Performance, Politics, SpectatorshipAbstract
Contemporary theatre performances offer many examples of audience engagement - its forms range from physical interventions into public space to mental emancipation of the audience’s imagination. These practices put into question the effectiveness of the existing tools of audience research because, in some instances, theatre serves as a manipulation machine, “tricking” the public to perform specific social actions, while in other cases, it becomes a tool for the deconstruction of manipulation mechanisms at the same time serving as a platform for engaging entertainment. Audience research paradigms, based on dichotomies such as passive/active, inclusion/exclusion or incorporation/resistance are no longer able to address the complex concepts of spectatorship as performance, co-creation, or audience participation. Therefore, new practices of audience participation, conspicuously emerging in contemporary Lithuanian theatre, can only be adequately addressed by combining methodologies from different disciplines and critically evaluating historical and theoretical implications of these practices. In my article, I will focus on the historical implications of the term “audience participation” as a form of public engagement and issues of its application as experienced by theatre artists and audiences in Lithuania. The article will also examine the theoretical implications of the notion of participatory turn and its effect on theatre productions at the same time challenging the conceptual equations of “active spectatorship” in the aesthetic sphere to the emergence of “active participant” in the public sphere.
References
Bartusevičiūtė, Renata. 2016. “Instruktažas, kuriam pritrūko instrukcijų“, http://www.menufaktura.lt/?m=1025&s=61203 (September 05 2017).
Bishop, Claire. 2006. “Introduction” in Viewers as Producers. Participation. Ed. Claire Bishop. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and Politics of Spectatorship. London, New York: Verso.
Butsch, Richard. 2000. The Making of American Audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butsch, Richard. 2008. The Citizen Audience. Crowds, Publics, and Individuals. London: Routledge.
Eco, Umberto. 1989. The Open Work, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Foster, Hal. 1985. Recodings: Art, Spectacle, Cultural Politics. Washington: Bay Press.
Foster, Hal. 2006. “Chat Rooms” in Participation. Ed. Claire Bishop. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Glusker, Anne. 2006. “The Best Seats for this Play Are Moving Fast”, https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/17/theater/17glus.html (May 11 2018).
Harvie, Jen. 2013. Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rancière, Jacques. 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. London, New York: Verso.
Schäfer, Mirko Tobias. 2011. Bastard Culture!: How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
Staniškytė, Jurgita. 2006. “Rewriting the Canon: The Nature of Political in Contemporary Lithuanian Theatre” in Lituanus. Chicago: Lituanus Foundation.
The Participatory Cultures Handbook. 2013. Eds. Aaron Delwicke, Jennifer J. Henderson. New York: Routledge.
White, Gareth. 2013. Audience Participation in Theatre. Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright belongs to the authors and Nordic Theatre Studies. Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in the journal but only for non-commercial purposes. Users are allowed to link to the files, download the files, distribute the files on a local network (preferably by links), upload the files to local repositories if their institutions require them to do so, but not republish the files without proper agreements with the journal and the author.