Rethinking the Critical Impact of an Education of Performance Art in Denmark
As the Danish National School of Performing Arts merged nine schools into one institution, the momentum for establishing a national, state-funded education in performance art was missed and the continuation of “traditional” profiles within performing arts education was kept. As such, the future of performance art can be seen as a kind of “supplementary technique” to otherwise acting- and text-based theatre in Denmark.
This article argues, through examinations of three basic aspects of performance art, for the necessity of profiling performance art as a separate, own genre in a Danish educational context. The article does not engage in a mapping of the field of performing arts educations in Denmark or of the different approaches to an educational programme in performance art. Rather, it addresses some of the basic critical figures and approaches in performance art that would challenge the scope of conventional theatre education –
and could potentially be a game-changer within Danish performing arts.
Firstly, the performance artist as a figure questioning representation is traced through historical figures of the avant-garde. Secondly, the sociality of performance art is read as confronting and challenging the work ethos of a neo-liberal context, where creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship have become imperatives. And finally, the production of performance art is read as a mode of producing knowledge, which challenges the instrumentalization of art as well as a standardization of academic methods.
In conclusion, after the presentation of the three perspectives on performance art, the organization, scope, and potential impact of a Danish education in performance art is presented in a coda.
Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Boycott-Group, The. 2013. “DER AUFSTAND IST NICHT GESPIELT – THE OCCUPATION OF THE MAXIM GORKI THEATRE.” In Stefan Apostolou-Hölscher, Bojana Cvejić, Bojana Kunst, Franziska Aigner, Katja Čičigoj, Tom Engels, Marta Keil, Frank Max Müller (eds). The Public Commons and the Undercommons of Art, Education and Labor. The Reader. Frankfurt am Main: Justus Liebig University, Gießen, 22-34.
Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos. New York: Zone Books.
Carlson, Marvin. 1996. Performance: A Critical Introduction. Routledge.
Christensen, Anette Asp; Fentz, Christine; Lund, Jette. 2011. Overvejelser – om scenekunstuddannelser i Danmark. Foreningen Uafhængige Scenekunstnere.
Cull, Laura. 2009. ”Deleuze and differential presence in performance”, unpublished conference paper delivered at Performing Presence conference, University of Exeter, March 2009. https://www.academia.edu/368162/Deleuze_and_differential_presence_in_performance. Accessed 27 December 2018.
Dithmer, Monna; Holm, Staffan Valdemar; Seeberg, Lars. 2010. Veje til udvikling. Scenekunst i Danmark. Kulturministeriet.
Eikels, Kai van. 2013. Die Kunst des Kollektiven. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Fried, Michael. (1969) . ”Art and Objecthood.” In Gregory Battcock (ed.). Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology. London: Studio Vista.
Freytag-Loringhoven, Elsa von. 2011. Body Sweats: The Uncensored Writings of Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven. Irene Gammel and Suzanne Zelazo (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gammel, Irene. 2002: Baroness Elsa: Gender, Dada and Everyday Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hannula, Mika. 2009. ”Catch Me If You Can: Chances and Challenges of Artistic Research.” Art and Research. A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, Vol. 2, No. 2.
Johnson, Dominic. 2012. Glorious Catastrophe. Jack Smith, performance, and visual culture. Manchester U.P.
Jones, Amelia. 2005. Irrational Modernism: A Neurasthenic History of New York Dada. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kulturministeriet. 2013. Udredning om de videregående uddannelser på scenekunstområdet.
Kunst, Bojana. 2013. ”The Project Horizon: On the Temporality of Making.” Les Laboratoires d’Aubervilliers. http://www.leslaboratoires.org/en/article/project-horizon/suivre-capturer-le-temps-dans-la-performance-contemporaine. Accessed 27 December 2018.
Kunst, Bojana. 2015. Artist at Work. Proximity of Art and Capitalism. New York: Zero Books.
Maharaj, Sarat. 2009. ”Know-how and No-How: stopgap notes on “method” in visual art as knowledge production.” Art and Research. A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods. Vol. 2, No. 2. http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v2n2/maharaj.html. Accessed 27 December 2018.
McKenzie, Jon. 2001. Perform or Else. From Discipline to Performance. London & N.Y.: Routledge.
Rogoff, Irit. 2006a. “From Criticism to Critique to Criticality” at http://eipcp.net/ transversal/0806/rogoff1/en. Accessed 27 December 2018.
Rogoff, Irit. 2006b. “Smuggling” – An Embodied Criticality. eipcp.net/dlfiles/rogoff-smuggling. Accessed 27 December 2018.
Rogoff, Irit. 2008. “What is a Theorist.” In James Elkins (ed.). The State of Art Criticism. New York and London: Routledge, 97-109.
Schmidt, Cecilie Ullerup. 2018.”Infrastructural Performance: Reclaiming Social Relationality in Times of Structural Precarity” in Nordic Theatre Studies Journal Vol. 30 (no.1), 5-19.
Schultz, Laura Luise. 2012. “Døden og materien.” In Sara Dahlstrup Mogensen, Jan Høgh Stricker et al. (eds). Beyond Identity III. Das Beckwerk Museum and Strandberg Publishing.
Stimson, Blake & Gregory Sholette. 2007. Collectivism after Modernism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tranholm, Mette Risgård. 2017. Disincarnation: Jack Smith and the character as assemblage. PhD dissertation. University of Copenhagen.
Vedel, Karen; Rosendal Nielsen, Thomas, et al. 2015. Peripeti Vol. 23: Performanceuddannelse. Aarhus Universitet.
Verwoert. Jan. 2014. “Why Is Art Met With Disbelief? It’s Too Much Like Magic.” In Cookie! Berlin: Sternberg Press.
Wagner, Meike. 2016. “Expanding the Canon, Creating Alternative Knowledge, Marketing the Field? Performance Practices in Theatre Studies.” Nordic Theatre Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1.
Weeks, Kathi. 2018. ”Down with Love: Feminist Critique and the New Ideologies of Work.” https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3614-down-with-love-feministcritique- and-the-new-ideologies-of-work. Accessed 27 December 2018.
The copyright belongs to the authors and Nordic Theatre Studies. Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in the journal but only for non-commercial purposes. Users are allowed to link to the files, download the files, distribute the files on a local network (preferably by links), upload the files to local repositories if their institutions require them to do so, but not republish the files without proper agreements with the journal and the author.