Theatre, Science, and the Popular: Two Contemporary Examples From Scandinavia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nts.v29i2.104609Keywords:
Charlotte Engelkes, Peder Bjurman, Svarta hål, Hotel Pro Forma, Kosmos , Edmund Husserl, the theatrical event, science theatre, science-in-theatre, science history, popularisa¬tion, popular science, science communicationAbstract
This article explores relations between theatre, science, and the popular, which have largely been overlooked by Nordic theatre studies. The aim here is to introduce and understand the variety of ways theatre may communicate science to the public, the point of departure informed by the historical development of the relations between the three concepts and Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological critique of modern science. The two analytical examples are Swedish Charlotte Engelkes’ and Peder Bjurman’s Svarta hål – en kvantfysisk vaudeville (2014) and Danish Hotel Pro Forma’s adult performance for children Kosmos+ En Big Bang forestilling om universets vidundre (2014).
History of science reveals complex combinations of science and the popular in theatrical events that raises the question if the audience’s understanding of the scientific subject matter itself always was – or has to be – the purpose of the popular science performance, or if it rather was – and is – about spurring interest by inspiring sentiments of wonder and reflection on science’s impact on life and outlooks. Newer conceptual developments also suggest that it is not always the case that theatre is a tool for science popularisation, as a specific genre science theatre, but that scientific information and concepts are artistically interpreted by theatre, and not always in ways affirmative of the science. This later variant is called science-in-theatre. The two genres are demonstrated through the analyses of Svarta hål and Kosmos+, the claim being that the first was an ambiguous exposition of science, i.e. science-in-theatre, whereas the second established an artistically visionary affirmation, as regular science theatre.References
Ball, Philip. 2002. “Beyond Words: Science and visual theatre.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 27:3, 169-72. DOI: 10.1179/030801802225005617
Barthes, Roland. 1988. The Semiotic Challenge. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Bohr, Niels. 1928. “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory.” in Nature 121, 580-90.
Bonestell, Chesley. 1944. Saturn as seen from Mimas, http://bonestell.org/#prettyPhoto[bonestell]/2/ (1.7.2017).
Brier, Søren, Hjørland, Birger, and Ørom, Anders. 1997. Faglitteraturens doku-menttyper i kommunikations- og videnskabsteoretisk belysning. Copenhagen: Danmarks Biblioteksskole.
Brown, Mike. 2010. How I killed Pluto and Why It Had It Coming. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
Campos, Liliane. 2013. “Science in Contemporary British Theatre: A conceptual approach.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 38:4, 295-305. DOI: 10.1179/0308018813Z.00000000060
Chemi, Tatiana and Kastberg, Peter. 2015. “Education through Theater: Typologies of Science Theater.” Applied Theater Research 3:1, 53-65. DOI: 10.1386/atr.3.1.53_1
Dehlholm, Kirsten. 2014. Cosmos+. Concept, http://hotelproforma.dk/projekt/ cosmos/ (1.7.2017)
Dehlhom, Kirsten, Laura Mortensen, Anne Mette Fisker Langkjer, Magnus Pind Bjerre, Morten Søndergaard, Tomas Lagermand Lundme, and Mindaugas Nastaravicius. 2015. Cosmos+. Unpublished English version manuscript.
Djerassi, Carl. 2002. “Contemporary ‘Science-in-Theatre’: A rare genre.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 27:3. DOI: 10.1179/030801802225003268
Eriksson, Gunnar. 1994. “Populärvetenskap.” In Nationalencyklopedin 15. Höganäs: Bokförlaget bra böcker.
Guidice, Rick. s.a. View to the Future (II), https://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/settle 178.GIF (1.7.2017).
Hamish, Lindsay. 2001. Tracking Apollo to the Moon. London: Springer.
Hawking, Stephen. 1988. A Brief History of the Universe. New York: Bantam Dell Publishing Group.
Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Translated by Davis Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Innes, Christopher. 2011. “‘Et in Arcadia Ego’: The Relationship of Arcadia to Stoppard’s Work.” In Liliane Campos and Julie Vatain (eds.). Lectures de Tom Stoppard. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 15-21.
Innes, Christopher. 2002. “Science on the Stage.” In Bernhard Reiz (ed.). British Drama in the Nineties. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag, 95-106.
Kosmos+ En Big Bang forestilling om universets vidundre. Director: Kirsten Dehlholm. Performers: Frederic Linde-Fleron, Lau Emil Koeller, Frida Striim Therkel¬sen, Zoé Andrea Braum Polychronopoulos, Ellen Hillingsø, Niels Anders Thorn, Bende Harris, Preben Harris, Sofie Lebech, Lisbeth Sonne, Casper Sloth, and Stine Gyldenkerne. Concept: Kirsten Dehlholm, Anne Mette Fisker Langkjer, Jesper Grimstrup, Magnus Pind Bjerre. Music: Ernestas Kausylas/Brokenchord, Misa Skalskis/96wrld. Script: Kirsten Dehlholm, Laura Mortensen, Morten Søndergaard, Anne Mette Fisker Langkjer, Mindaugas Nastara¬vicius, Tomas Lagermand Lundme. Science research: Jesper Grim-strup, Anne Mette Fisker Langkjer, Laura Mortensen, Kirsten Dehlholm. Video design: Magnus Pind Bjerre, Birk Marcus Hansen. Set design: Anne Mette Fisker Langkjer, Jesper Kongshaug, Kirsten Dehlholm. Light design: Jesper Kongshaug. Sound design: Kristian Hverring. Costume design: Henrik Vibskov. Premiere: 4.2.2015. Den Grå Hal. Copenhagen.
Lightman, Bernard. 2007. Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lomborg, Jon. s.a. Milky Way Woman. https://www.jonlomberg.com/digital_ prints/dp_milky_way_woman.html (1.7.2017).
“Pluto fights back.” 2006. The Economist, 7.9.2006, http://www.economist.com/ node/7880067 (1.7.2017).
Priestley, Joseph. 1779-1786. Experiment and Observations Relating to Various Branches of Natural Philosophy 1. London.
“Pluto looses its status as a planet.” BBC News 24.8.2006, http://news.bbc. co.uk/2/hi/5282440.stm
Qvortrup, Lars. 2003. “Forplejningssted for formen.” In Per Theil, Kirsten Dehlholm, and Lars Qvortrup. Hotel Pro Forma. Den dobbelte iscenesættelse: Rum og performance. Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag, 173-93.
Riskin, Jessica. 2016. “Amusing Physics.” In Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent and Christine Blondel (eds.). Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment. London and New York: Routledge, 43-63.
Sauter, Willmar. 2008. Eventness. A concept of Theatrical Event. Stockholm: STUTS.
Shepard-Barr, Kirsten. 2006. Science on Stage: From Doctor Faustus to Copenhagen, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Skjoldager-Nielsen, Kim. 2015. “Scenisk rumkunst. Kosmos+.” In Erik Exe Christoffersen & Kathrine Winkelhorn (eds.). Skønhedens Hotel. Hotel Pro Forma: Et laboratorium for scenekunst. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 197-211.
Svarta Hål – en kvantfysisk vaudeville. Directors: Charlotte Engelkes & Peder Bjurmann. Performers: Charlotte Engelkes, Lindy Larsson, Leif Jordansson, Tomas Hallonsten, and Erik Nilsson. Text: Sofie Holgersson. Music: Leif Jordans¬son. Staging: Peder Bjurmann. Costumes: Anna Ardelius. Lights: Tobias Hallgren. Premiere: 23.9.2014. Södra Teatern. Stockholm.
Topham, Jonathan R. 2016. “Rethinking the History of Science Popularization/Popular Science.” In Faidra Papanelopoulou, Augustí Nieto-Galan and Enrique Perdiguero (eds.). Popularizing Science and Technology in the Euro-pean Periphery 1800-2000. London & N.Y.: Routledge, 1-20.
Theil, Per. 2003. “Sans og samling.” In Per Theil, Kirsten Dehlholm, and Lars Qvortrup. Hotel Pro Forma. Den dobbelte iscenesættelse: Rum og performance. Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag, 1-26.
Trujillo, Joshua. 2011. “Protest to reinstate Pluto as a planet.” Seattle’s Big Blog blog. http://blog.seattlepi.com/thebigblog/2011/03/12/protest-to-reinstate-pluto-as-a-planet/ (1.7.2017)
Vanhoutte, Kurt & Wynants, Nele. 2017. “On the Passage of a Man of the Theatre Through a Rather Brief Moment of Time: Henri Rubin, performing astronomy in nineteenth century Paris.” Early Visual Culture 15:2, 152-74. DOI: 10.1080/17460654.2017.1318520
Whitley, Richard. 1985. “Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers: Popularisation as a relation between scientific fields and their publics.” In Terry Shinn and Richard Whitley (eds.). Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularization. Sociology of the Sciences: A yearbook 9. Dordrecht: Reidel, 3-28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright belongs to the authors and Nordic Theatre Studies. Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in the journal but only for non-commercial purposes. Users are allowed to link to the files, download the files, distribute the files on a local network (preferably by links), upload the files to local repositories if their institutions require them to do so, but not republish the files without proper agreements with the journal and the author.