<em>Hvis</em>, <em>da</em> og <em>fordi</em> ekstraktion fra adverbielle ledsætninger var mulig

Forfattere

  • Anne Mette Nyvad
  • Ken Ramshøj Christensen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nfg.v1i30.137960

Nøgleord:

syntaktiske øer, sætningsknuder, flytning, acceptabilitet, pragmatik

Referencer

Abeillé, A. m.fl. (2020): Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition 204, 104293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293.

Bondevik, I., D. Kush & T. Lohndal (2020): Variation in adjunct islands: The case of Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44, 1–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586520000207.

Christensen, K.R., J. Kizach & A.M. Nyvad (2013): Escape from the Island: Grammaticality and (Reduced) Acceptability of wh-island Violations in Danish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42, 51–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9210-x.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2014): On the nature of escapable relative islands. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37, 29–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586514000055.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2019): No escape from the island: On extraction from complement wh-clauses in English. The Sign of the V – Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner. K.R. Christensen, H. Jørgensen & J.L. Wood (red.). Aarhus: Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University. 95–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.348.91.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2022): The Island Is Still There: Experimental Evidence For The Inescapability Of Relative Clauses In English. Studia Linguistica 76, 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12192.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2023): Økuller? Det er ikke altid lige (u)acceptabelt at forlade en indlejring. MUDS 19. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.

Christianson, K. m.fl. (2001): Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger. Cognitive Psychology 42, 368–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0752.

Engdahl, E. (1986): Constituent questions: the syntax and semantics of questions with special reference to Swedish. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Erteschik-Shir, N. (1973): On the nature of island constraints. Ph.d.-afhandling. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Goldberg, A.E. (2005): Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001.

Hansen, A. (1967): Moderne Dansk. Bind I. København: Grafisk Forlag.

Hansen, E. & L. Heltoft (2011): Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. bind I-III. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.

Huang, C.-T.J. (1982): Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.d.-afhandling. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Jensen, A. (2002): Sætningsknuder i dansk. NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier 29, 105–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v29i29.13427.

Kush, D., T. Lohndal & J. Sprouse (2018): Investigating variation in island effects: A Case Study of Norwegian Wh-Extraction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36, 743–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z.

Kush, D., T. Lohndal & J. Sprouse (2019): On the island sensitivity of topicalization in Norwegian: An experimental investigation. Language 95, 393–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0051.

Mikkelsen, K. (1894): Dansk Sproglære, Med Sproghistoriske Tillæg: Haandbog For Lærere Og Viderekomne. København: Lehman & Stages Forlag.

Mikkelsen, L. (2015): VP anaphora and verb-second order in Danish. Journal of Linguistics 51, 595–643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226715000055.

Müller, C. (2017): Extraction from Adjunct Islands in Swedish. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 35, 67–85. http://ojs.novus.no/index.php/NLT/article/view/1399.

Müller, C. & C.U. Eggers (2022): Island Extractions in the Wild: A Corpus Study of Adjunct and Relative Clause Islands in Danish and English. Languages 7, 125. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020125.

Nyvad, A.M., J. Kizach & K.R. Christensen (2014): (Non-)Arguments in Long-Distance Extractions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9300-z.

Nyvad, A.M., C. Müller & K.R. Christensen (2022): Too True to Be Good? The Non-Uniformity of Extraction from Adjunct Clauses in English. Languages 7, 244. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040244.

Nyvad, A.M., C. Müller & K.R. Christensen (2023): Moving away from the island. Extraction from adjunct clauses in Danish. [Under udarbejdelse.]

Poulsen, M. (2008): Acceptability and processing of long-distance dependencies in Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 31, 73–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586508001832.

Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Ross, J.R. (1967): Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.d.-afhandling. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Sprouse, J. m.fl. (2016): Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34, 307–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8.

Stowell, T.A. (1981): Origins of phrase structure. Ph.d.-afhandling. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Szabolcsi, A. & T. Lohndal (2017): Strong vs. Weak Islands. The Companion to Syntax. M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (red.). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom008.

Downloads

Publiceret

2023-10-16

Citation/Eksport

Nyvad, A. M., & Ramshøj Christensen, K. (2023). <em>Hvis</em>, <em>da</em> og <em>fordi</em> ekstraktion fra adverbielle ledsætninger var mulig. Ny Forskning I Grammatik, 1(30), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.7146/nfg.v1i30.137960

Nummer

Sektion

Artikler