Digital storytelling as sociotechnical imaginary
The performative power of journalistic innovation discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.137370Keywords:
journalistic innovation, digital storytelling, sociotechnical imaginaries, technological drama, innovation discourseAbstract
This article zooms in on the sociotechnical imaginaries within the discourse on digital storytelling as journalistic innovation in the Netherlands. It analyzes how digital storytelling is discussed since 2015 on the online platforms of the Dutch Journalism Fund and the Dutch Association of Journalists, two central intermediary organizations within the Dutch journalistic landscape that play a vital role in the debate about journalistic innovation and journalism’s future. My analysis shows that this discourse provides a rather one-dimensional and uniform sociotechnical imaginary that presents the future as one in which digital-savvy news consumers can only be engaged through a more captivating way of reporting, allowing for more interactivity and forms of storytelling that draws them into the story on an experiential and emotional level. The techno-centric focus reinforces the already prevalent understanding of journalistic innovation as primarily a matter of mastering and exploiting the digital affordances of new technological tools and platforms without questioning or problematizing how this impacts journalism’s professional ethics and subsequently its cultural authority.
References
Ampuja, M. (2016). The new spirit of capitalism, innovation fetishism and new information and communication technologies. Javnost-The Public 23(1): 19-36.
Baym, G. (2017). Journalism and the hybrid condition: Long-form television drama at the intersections of news and narrative. Journalism 18(1): 11-26.
Bélair-Gagnon, V. & Steinke, A. (2021). Capturing digital news inno-vation research in organizations, 1990-2018. Journalism Studies 21(12): 1724-1743.
Bleyen, V., Lindmark, S., Ranaivosen, H. & Ballon, P. (2014). A Typolo-gy of Media Innovations: Insights from an Exploratory Study. The Journal of Media Innovations 1(1): 28-51.
Boesman, J. & Costera Meijer, I. (2018). Nothing but the facts? Explor-ing the discursive space for storytelling and truth-seeking in journalism. Journalism Practice 12(8): 997-1007.
Bossio, D. & Nelson, J. (2021). Reconsidering innovation: Situating and evaluation change in journalism. Journalism Studies 22(11): 1377-1381.
Broersma, Marcel. 2010. “Journalism as a Performative Discourse. The Importance of Form and Style in Journalism.” In: Rupar, V. (Ed.) Journalism and Meaning-making: reading the Newspaper. Cresskill: Hampton Press. 15-35.
Broersma, M. & Peters, C. (2016) “Introduction: Towards a functional perspective on journalism’s role and relevance.” In: Peters, C. & Broersma, M. (Eds.) Rethinking journalism again. Societal role and public relevance in a digital age. New York: Routledge. 1-17.
Carlson, M. (2015). The Robotic Reporter. Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. Digital Journalism 3(3): 416-431
Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic Discourse and the Meanings of Journalism: Definitional Control, Boundary Work, and Legitima-tion. Communication Theory 26(4): 349-368.
Carlson, M. & Usher, N. (2016). News startups as agents of innovation: For-profit digital news startups manifestos as metajournalistic discourse. Digital Journalism 4(5): 563-581.
Carlson, M. & Lewis, S. (2019). Temporal reflexivity in journalism studies: Making sense of change in a more timely fashion. Jour-nalism 20(5): 642-650.
Charmaz, K. (2014) Constructing grounded theory. Introducing quali-tative methods. London: SAGE.
Cools, H. (2020). Waarom bij immersieve journalistiek het verhaal centraal moet staan. svdj.nl 04-05-2020. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/waarom-bij-immersieve-journalistiek-het-verhaal-centraal-moet-staan/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Creech, B. & Nadler, A.M. (2018). Post-industrial fog: Reconsidering innovation in visions of journalism’s future. Journalism 19(2): 182-199.De Laet, (2019).
Eason, D. (1982). New Journalism, Metaphor and Culture. Journal of Popular Culture 15(4): 142-152.
Eason, D. (1986). On journalistic authority: the Janet Cooke scandal. Critical Studies in Media Communication 3(4): 429-447.
Ferucci, P. & Perreault, G. (2021). The Liability of Newness: Journal-ism, Innovation and the Issue of Core Competencies. Journalism Studies 22(11): 1436-1449.
Garcia-Aviles, J.A., Carvajal Prieto, M. & Arias Robles, F. (2018). Im-plementation of innovation in Spanish digital media: analysis of journalists’ perceptions. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 73: 369-384.
Garcia-Aviles, J.A. (2021). Journalism innovation research, a diverse and flourishing field (2000-2020). Profesional de la información 30(1): 1-33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.ene.10
Godin, B. (2015). Innovation contested: The idea of innovation over the centuries. New York: Routledge.
Harbers, F. (2014). Between personal experience and detached in-formation: The development of reporting and the reportage in Great Britain, the Netherlands and France, 1880-2005. Groning-en: s.n. [PhD Thesis].
Harbers, F. & Broersma, M. (2014). Between engagement and ironic ambiguity: Mediating subjectivity in narrative journalism. Jour-nalism 15(5): 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914523236
Harbers, F. & Van den Broek, I. (2016). Challenged boundaries: Jour-nalism and literature in the sixties. In: Harbers, F., Van den Broek, I. & Broersma, M. (eds.) Witnessing the Sixties: A Decade of Change in Journalism and Literature. Leuven: Peeters. ix-xxiv.
Harbers, F. (2016). Time to Engage. De Correspondent’s redefinition of journalistic quality. Digital Journalism 4(4): 494-511.
Harbers, F. (Forthcoming). Dangerous Narratives: How fake news and narrative journalism shed light on journalism’s epistemological foundations and self-understanding in the 21st century. In: Moenandar, S-J. & Van Heusden, B. (eds.) Narrative values, the value of narrative. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hartsock, J. (2001). A History of American Literary Journalism. The Emergence of a Modern Narrative Form. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Hellmueller, L. & Konow-Lund, M.T. (2019). Transnational journal-ism. In: Vos, T. & Hanusch, F. (Eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 1-7
Hendrickx, J. & Picone, I. (2020). Innovation Beyond the Buzzwords: The Rocky Road Towards a Digital First-based Newsroom. Jour-nalism Studies 21(14): 2025-2041.
Hepp, A. & Loosen, W. (2022). Beyond innovation: Pioneer journalism and the re-figuration of journalism. In: Ferucci, P. & Eldridge II, S. (Eds.). The Institutions Changing Journalism: Barbarians inside the gate. London: Routledge. 118-135
Holton, A. & Bélair-Gagnon, V. (2018). Strangers to the Game? Inter-lopers, Intralopers, and Shifting News Production. Media and Communication 6(4): 70-78.
Horizon Europe (2022). What is Horizon Europe? Horizon-eu.eu.[Last accessed: 26-9-2022].
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity. In: Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S. (Eds.). Dream-scapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. 1-33.
Katzenbauer, S. (2018). Waarom studenten journalistiek in Tilburg niet om de VR-cave heen kunnen. svdj.nl 24-09-2018. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/studenten-journalistiek-tilburg-vr-cave/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Kivits, N. (2018). Fontys Hogeschool Journalistiek bouwt ‘VR Cave’. Villamedia.nl 20-07-2018. Available at: https://www.villamedia.nl/artikel/fontys-hogeschool-journalistiek-bouwt-vr-cave [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Kivits, N. (2020). Probeersels van de publieke omroep leveren nog wat moois op ook. Villamedia.nl 08-04-2020. Available at: https://www.villamedia.nl/artikel/probeersels-van-de-publieke-omroep-leveren-nog-wat-moois-op-ook [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Kleis Nielsen, R. (2019). Vanguards and rearguards in the fight for the future of journalism. Rasmuskleisnielsen.net. 01-10-2019. [Last accessed on 26-09-2022].
Küng, L. (2013). Innovation, Technology and Organisational Change. Legacy Media’s Big Challenges. An Introduction. In: Storsul, T & Krumsvik, A. (Eds.) Media Innovations. A Multidisciplinary Study of Change. Göteborg: Nordicom. 9-12.
Lina, P. (2016). Community’s vanuit maatschappelijke documentaires. svdj.nl 18-08-2016 Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/the-case-bouwt-communitys-vanuit-maatschappelijke-documentaires/ [Last accessed on 5-5-2023]
Lowrey, W., Sherril, L. & Broussard, R. (2019). Field and ecology ap-proaches to journalism innovation: The role of ancillary organi-zations. Journalism Studies 20(15): 2131-2149.
Madou, S. (2021). Poen, pret en prestige: Arco Gnocchi (Dag en Nacht) over de toekomst van de podcast. svdj.nl 23-09-2021. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/poen-pret-en-prestige-arco-gnocchi-dag-en-nacht-over-de-toekomst-van-de-podcast/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Montgomery, T. (2016). Are Social Innovation Paradigms Incommen-surable? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27: 1979-2000.
Nab, L. (2019) Wie de trend volgt, experimenteert met vormen van immersive storytelling. Villamedia.nl 8-04-2019. Available at: https://www.villamedia.nl/artikel/wie-de-trend-volgt-experimenteert-met-vormen-van-immersive-storytelling [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Piels, A. (2017a). De beste tools (VIII): zelf aan de slag met audio. svdj.nl 02-07-2017. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/beste-tools-viii-zelf-aan-slag-audio/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Piels, A. (2017b). De beste tools (XI): experimenteren met virtual rea-lity en 360 graden. svdj.nl 29-08-2017. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/beste-tools-xi-experimenteren-virtual-reality-en-360-graden/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Posetti, J. (2018). Time to step away from the ‘bright, shiny things’? To-wards a sustainable model of journalism innovation in an era of perpetual change. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Jour-nalism.
Roiland, J. (2015). By Any Other Name: The Case for Literary Journal-ism. Literary Journalism Studies 7(2): 61- 89.
Ruotsalainen, J., Heinonen, S., Hujanen, S. & Villi, M. (2021). Pioneers as peers: How entrepreneurial journalists imagine the futures of journalism. Digital Journalism. 1-20 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1996252
Schiolin, K. (2020). Revolutionary dreams: Future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science 50(4): 542-566.
Schohaus, B. (2021). Olaf Koens: ‘Ik hoop dat journalisten in 2022 meer stelling gaan nemen’ svdj.nl 09-12-2021 Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/olaf-koens-ik-hoop-dat-journalisten-in-2022-meer-stelling-gaan-nemen/ [Last ac-cessed: 5-5-2023]
Steensen, S. (2009). What’s stopping them? Towards a grounded theo-ry of innovation in online journalism. Journalism Studies 10(6): 821-836.
Storsul, T. & Krumsvik, A. (2013). What is Media Innovation? In: Stor-sul, T & Krumsvik, A. (Eds.) Media Innovations. A Multidisciplinary Study of Change. Göteborg: Nordicom. 13-26.
Stimuleringsfond voor de Journalistiek (2019). Bij dataplatform Poin-ter vormen journalist, vormgever en developer een drie-eenheid. svdj.nl Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/bij-dataplatform-pointer-journalist-vormgever-developer-drie-eenheid/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Underwood, D. (2008). Journalism and the Novel. Truth and Fiction, 1700-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Beld, J. (2017). Zelf multimediale producties maken met Fairytale. svdj.nl 17-01-2017. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/zelf-multimediale-producties -maken-met-fairytale/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Van den Griendt, J. (2019). Met deze voice-toepassingen kun je nú aan de slag in de journalistiek. svdj.nl 11-07-2019. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/met-deze-voice-toepassingen-kun-je-nu-aan-de-slag-in-de-journalistiek/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Van der Meer, E. (2017). Studenten schudden de Limburgse journalis-tiek op. svdj.nl 30-03-2017. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/studenten-schudden-limburgse-journalistiek-op/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Van der Steen, S. (2016). Volkskrant kijkt verder: ‘De techniek is se-cundair’ svdj.nl 25-04-2016. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/volkskrant-kijk-verder-de-techniek-is-secundair/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Van Dijck, J.F.T.M. (2019). Guarding public values in a connective world: challenges for Europe. In: Boyd-Barret, O. & Mirrlees, T. (Eds.). Media imperialism: continuity and change. Lanham, Mary-land: Rowman & Littlefield. 175-185.
Van Krieken, K. & Sanders, J. (2017). Framing narrative journalism as a new genre: A case study of the Netherlands. Journalism 18(10): 1364-1380.
Van Krieken, K. & Sanders, J. (2021). What is narrative journalism? A systematic review and an empirical agenda. Journalism 22(6): 1393-1412.
Vázquez-Herrero, J., López-García, X. & Irigaray, F. (2020). The tech-nology-led narrative turn. In: Vázquez-Herrerro, J., Direito-Rebollal, S. Silva-Rodríguez, A. & López-García, X. (Eds.) Journalis-tic Metamorphosis. Cham: Springer. 29-40.
Visser, A. (2016). Meer, sneller, beter: technologische ontwikkelingen voor de journalistiek op EyeEm. svdj.nl 01-09-2016. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/meer-sneller-beter-technologische-ontwikkelingen-voor-de-journalistiek-op-eyeem/ [Last accessed on: 5-5-2023]
Ward, S.J. (2009). Journalism in the Entrepreneurial Age. Center for Journalism Ethics, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 15-09-2009. [Last accessed on 26-09-2022].
Willemsen, S., Witschge, T. & Sauer, S. (2021). Improvisation and En-trepreneurial Journalism: Reimagining Innovation. Journalism Studies 22(11): 1487-1503.
Wirmuth, M. (2017). AI is de trend, maar hoe gaat het eigenlijk met VR?. svdj.nl 070-04-2017. Available at: https://www.svdj.nl/nieuws/ai-is-de-trend-maar-hoe-gaat-het-eigenlijk-met-vi/ [Last accessed at: 5-5-2023]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Frank Harbers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).
