Comprehensible legal texts - utopia or a question of wording? On processing rephrased German court decisions

Authors

  • Sandra Hansen
  • Ralph Dirksen
  • Martin Küchler
  • Kerstin Kunz
  • Stella Neumann

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v19i36.25836

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the comprehensibility of rephrased syntactic structures in German court decisions. While there are a number of studies using psycholinguistic methods to investigate the comprehensibility of original legal texts, we are not aware of any study looking into the effect resolving complex structures has on the comprehensibility. Our study combines three methodological steps. First, we analyse an annotated corpus of court decisions, press releases and newspaper reports on these decisions in order to detect those complex structures in the decisions which distinguish them from the other text types. Secondly, these structures are rephrased into two increasingly simple versions. Finally, all versions are subjected to a self paced reading experiment. The findings suggest that rephrasing greatly enhances the comprehensibility for the lay reader.

Downloads

Published

2006-03-09

How to Cite

Hansen, S., Dirksen, R., Küchler, M., Kunz, K., & Neumann, S. (2006). Comprehensible legal texts - utopia or a question of wording? On processing rephrased German court decisions. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 19(36), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v19i36.25836

Issue

No. 36 (2006)

Section

THEMATIC SECTION: Linguistic monitoring of communication between legal experts and laymen

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).