Questioning the univocity ideal. The difference between socio-cognitive Terminology and traditional Terminology

Authors

  • Rita Temmerman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v10i18.25412

Abstract

In this article we are questioning the univocity ideal of traditional Terminology. We show how traditional Terminology in line with Saussurian structuralism ignores part of the interplay between the elements of the semantic triangle. Cognitive semantics and functional linguistics have offered an alternative for the Saussurian structuralist approach. Several of their findings can be of use for the development of socio-cognitive Terminology.
In the LSP of the life sciences, the structure of concepts reflects their episte-mological function. This could have consequences for the principles and methods of terminological description. While some concepts (like intron ) are clear-cut and can therefore be submitted to the principle of univocity, others (like blotting and biotech-nology) have prototype structure. For prototypically structured categories univocity can not be the aim as polysemy, synonymy and figurative language are part of their naming history.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-10

How to Cite

Temmerman, R. (2017). Questioning the univocity ideal. The difference between socio-cognitive Terminology and traditional Terminology. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 10(18), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v10i18.25412

Issue

No. 18 (1997)

Section

THEMATIC SECTION: Specialised Lexicography and Terminology

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).