Faut-il continuer à faire de l'analyse de discours?

Authors

  • Anne Reboul
  • Jacques Moeschler

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v9i16.25384

Keywords:

Discourse analysis, coherence, reductionism, contextualism, scientifically relevant natural categories, utterances, relevance, local intentionality, global intentionality, communicative intention, informative intention

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the legitimacy of discourse analysis. We intend to show here that discourse analysis rest on a highly debatable hypothesis and that the notion of coherence, which is closely associated with discourse analysis, is, at best, a pre-scientific notion. We will try to show that a reductionist approach to discourse would be both more scientifically sound and more efficient. We will, finally, outline an alternative view of discourse and coherence.

Published

2017-02-09

How to Cite

Reboul, A., & Moeschler, J. (2017). Faut-il continuer à faire de l’analyse de discours?. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 9(16), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v9i16.25384

Issue

Section

THEMATIC SECTION: Text Linguistics